Mississippi College School of Law
Not a member yet
1198 research outputs found
Sort by
Reforming the Mississippi Criminal Code Part III: Person-Endangering Crimes Against Habitation and Property: Arson, Burglary, Robbery, and Related Crimes
Get PDFA Taste of Justice: 1st Amend. (4) Unprotected-Speech Advocates Illegal Action (Modern-Brandenburg)
No full textThis presentation continues the discussion of an Unprotected Category of Speech: Speech that Advocates Illegal Action. Remember, generally, government may not regulate the Content of Pure Speech UNLESS government meets the most exacting level of scrutiny or strict scrutiny. However, government may (if it chooses to) regulate the Content of Pure Speech if the speech is in an UNPROTECTED category. If the speech is in an unprotected category, government may regulate it more freely and generally with a low level rational basis. This presentation continues the coverage of the unprotected category of Speech that Advocates Illegal Action. The prior video discussed the historical tests/cases. This presentation will discuss the MODERN DAY TEST-THE BRANDENBURG CASE. Then the next presentation will discuss a post 9/11 case discussing foreign terrorism. This YouTube Channel is designed to provide my students supplemental instruction, as I teach them remotely. I want them to take a soak in the law and not a quick shower. This Channel is also designed to provide learning to the broader community. Learning can lead to enlightenment, and enlightenment to justice...or, at least, to a taste of justice
A Taste of Justice: 1st Amend. (22) Students’ Position Statements-Current 1st Amend Conflicts SOON!
No full textThis series has been tracking my First Amendment Law course. An upcoming assignment for the class is the preparation of the Student Position Statements on Current First Amendment Conflicts. This presentation briefly describes the educational and professional purposes of the assignment. See also Student Position Statements on Current Constitutional Conflicts: Teaching Con Law Applications, while Remote, and Encouraging Respectful Engagement, Institute for Law Teaching and Learning, Law Teaching Blog (Oct. 29, 2020), http://lawteaching.org/2020/10/29/student-position-statements/ This YouTube Channel is designed to provide my students supplemental instruction, as I teach them remotely. I want them to take a soak in the law and not a quick shower. This Channel is also designed to provide learning to the broader community. Learning can lead to enlightenment, and enlightenment to justice...or, at least, to a taste of justice
A Taste of Justice: 1st Amend. (5) Unprotected-Speech Advocates Illegal Action-Post 9/11 Brandenburg
No full textThis presentation continues the discussion of an Unprotected Category of Speech: Speech that Advocates Illegal Action. Remember, generally, government may not regulate the Content of Pure Speech UNLESS government meets the most exacting level of scrutiny or strict scrutiny. However, government may (if it chooses to) more freely regulate the Content of Pure Speech if the speech is in an UNPROTECTED category. If the speech is in an unprotected category, government may regulate it generally with a low level rational basis. This presentation continues the coverage of the unprotected category of Speech that Advocates Illegal Action. The prior video presentations discussed the historical tests/cases and, then, the modern day test-Brandenburg case. This presentation will discuss a post 9/11 case about speech regarding a government designated foreign terrorism group; and, this presentation will question the possible implications of this case for domestic terrorism. This YouTube Channel is designed to provide my students supplemental instruction, as I teach them remotely. I want them to take a soak in the law and not a quick shower. This Channel is also designed to provide learning to the broader community. Learning can lead to enlightenment, and enlightenment to justice...or, at least, to a taste of justice
A Taste of Justice: 1st Amend. (6) Invalid, Vague, Overbroad, State Action, Selective Inc., Chilling
No full textThis presentation explains a number of terms that will be important as we continue the discussion of unprotected categories of speech. Remember, generally, government may not regulate the Content of Pure Speech UNLESS...and there are several unless-es. Generally, government may not regulate the Content of Pure Speech UNLESS government meets the most exacting level of scrutiny. However, government may regulate the Content of Pure Speech if the speech is in an UNPROTECTED category (which government generally may regulate with a low level rational basis). The first category of unprotected speech discussed was Speech that Advocates Illegal Action. This presentation will explain several terms including:Invalid on its Face, Invalid as Applied, Vagueness Doctrine, Overbreadth Doctrine, State Action, Selective Incorporation, and what it means to Chill Speech. The presentation will close with an introduction to the next category of unprotected speech we will discuss: Defamation. This YouTube Channel is designed to provide my students supplemental instruction, as I teach them remotely. I want them to take a soak in the law and not a quick shower. This Channel is also designed to provide learning to the broader community. Learning can lead to enlightenment, and enlightenment to justice...or, at least, to a taste of justice
A Taste of Justice: 1st Amend. (19) Government speech-in general and in public schools
No full textWe have considered the speech rights of individuals, associations, the press, and corporations. This presentation shifts to consider Government Speech in general and specifically as related to public schools where government messages and student speech may conflict. This YouTube Channel is designed to provide my students supplemental instruction, as I teach them remotely. I want them to take a soak in the law and not a quick shower. This Channel is also designed to provide learning to the broader community. Learning can lead to enlightenment, and enlightenment to justice...or, at least, to a taste of justice
A Taste of Justice: 1st Amend. (18) Access to Trials and the First Amendment, with Prof. Kupenda
No full textOrdinarily when we think about courtroom trials in law school, we think about courses like Civil Procedure, Criminal Procedure, Pre-Trial Practice, and Trial Practice. This presentation discusses the relevance of the First Amendment to trials, especially as to access to trials. Presumptively open trials serve many purposes according to the First Amendment as will be explained in this presentation. This YouTube Channel is designed to provide my students supplemental instruction, as I teach them remotely. I want them to take a soak in the law and not a quick shower. This Channel is also designed to provide learning to the broader community. Learning can lead to enlightenment, and enlightenment to justice...or, at least, to a taste of justice
