9571 research outputs found
Sort by
The Mark of Policing: Race and Criminal Records
This Essay argues that racial reckoning in policing should include a racial reckoning in the use of criminal records. Arrests alone—regardless of whether they result in convictions—create criminal records. Yet because the literature on criminal records most often focuses on prisoner reentry and on the consequences of criminal conviction, it is easy to overlook the connections between policing decisions and collateral consequences. This Essay employs the sociological framework of marking to show how criminal records entrench racial inequality stemming from policing. The marking framework recognizes that the government creates a negative credential every time it creates a record of arrest as well as conviction. Such records, in turn, trigger cascading consequences for employment, housing, immigration, and a host of other areas. The credentialing process matters because it enables and conceals race-based discrimination, and because a focus on the formal sentence often renders this discrimination invisible. This Essay considers how adopting a credentialing framework offers a way to surface, and ultimately to address, how race-based policing leaves lasting marks on over-policed communities
The Final Act -- Deportation by ICE Air
Deportation is a legal concept about which much has been written. But it is more complicated. For noncitizens, forced expulsion is a lived experience occurring in time and space — an act against the body, mostly black and brown bodies. In this Article, we part ways with the well-established narratives of deportation and the punishment/non-punishment paradigm to conceive of deportation not only as a legal concept, but as a physical act — the final act — that is, the culmination of the immigration enforcement dragnet. The physical removal of persons from the United States requires a complex system comprised of aviation networks and their various components, airports and airplanes, hangars and flight crews, and an array of physical restraints to intimidate, punish, or subdue deportees. We examine this infrastructure to illuminate the circumstances of expulsion and the egregious rights violations often suffered by deportees — violations that are almost always hidden from public view
Reading Magna Carta: Textualist or Originalist?
Debates concerning the proper method for reading legal texts did not begin in the modern era. In fact, they have been going on in our legal tradition for hundreds of years. One of the oldest, and most consequential, debates concerns the meaning of Magna Carta, the “big charter,” reluctantly granted by King John in 1215 in response to the demands of his rebellious barons. Many of its provisions, called chapters, resolved disputes that quickly became dated – very dated.
Although Magna Carta has by now receded too far into the past for us to be confident of its exact meaning, it can hardly be doubted that an originalist reading would establish (or re-establish) it as a thoroughly medieval document. But the American Revolutionaries did not read it that way. By the eighteenth century Magna Carta had acquired a meaning based on its text as read by Coke and his followers, not on its historical context