9571 research outputs found
Sort by
Pregnancy Advance Directives
Get PDFPart I of this Article provides a general introduction to the various types of advance directives available in the United States, including their goals and limitations. Part II provides a detailed overview of pregnancy restrictions, including comparisons of the substantive restrictions, procedural issues, and rationales for restricting the application of advance directives during pregnancy. Part III offers a critical analysis of both the scholarship addressing pregnancy restrictions and the litigation seeking to challenge the restrictions, demonstrating that the existing legal framework has not been satisfactory in resolving the issues—a situation that will only be exacerbated by the Supreme Court’s recent decision to overrule Roe v. Wade.
Part IV offers an alternative. Taking a cue from those who advocate for the creation of special advance directives for early-stage Alzheimer’s patients, it is time to consider the creation of a Pregnancy Advance Directive: a targeted medical form addressing a patient’s wishes in the case of decisional incapacity during pregnancy, which could be completed only after the patient has become pregnant. Although it would not answer those critics who prioritize the interests of the fetus above all, it would address the concerns of those who fear prior directives may no longer reflect the new circumstances of pregnancy. It would also have the salutary effect of encouraging physicians to discuss these issues with their pregnant patients, leading to deeper consideration of the concerns and establishing a more detailed record in the event such a difficult decision must be made
The Fraternity of Legal Style
Get PDFThis article reports the findings of an empirical study of writing experts mentioned in popular legal style books. The study shows that these experts are overwhelmingly men. This study complements the many other studies showing that gender and racial bias exists throughout the legal profession, but it focuses on one area that has not yet been examined: bias in books that give writing advice to lawyers. I call these books “legal style books.” The area of legal writing advice books is admittedly niche. However, it is worth studying because writing is central to lawyering
Donating to the District Attorney
No full textThe United States is the only country that elects its local prosecutors. In theory, these local elections could facilitate local control of criminal justice policy. But the academic literature assumes that, in practice, prosecutor elections fail to live up to that promise. This Article complicates that conventional wisdom with a new, national study of campaign contributions in prosecutor elections. The study offers a more complete empirical account of prosecutor accountability by analyzing contributions to local candidates as well as their election results. It details the amount of money in local prosecutor elections, including from interest groups, and the relationship between candidate fundraising and success. The stark differences across the country underscore that the more than two thousand local prosecutors are not a monolith; some offices are best understood as political, with contested elections and significant amounts of campaigning, while most appear more bureaucratic, with neither. Recognizing this distinction suggests that accountability efforts require a multifaceted approach. If some prosecutors are more akin to bureaucrats, reformers should not limit themselves to recruiting electoral challengers; they should also consider layering bureaucratic accountability on top of political accountability. Further, at least for now, money in prosecutor politics has served as a moderating, rather than punitive, force
Psychedelic Capitalism and the Perceptual Threshold
No full textThis invited response to Mason Marks et al., Microdosing Psychedelics Under Local, State, and Federal Law examines how evolving psychedelic regulation may ultimately favor below‑perceptual‑threshold approaches—such as microdosing and nonsubjective psychoplastogens—over the traditional, above‑threshold psychedelic experience.
Because such developments risk marginalizing the culturally, spiritually, and cognitively significant psychedelic experience, the author contends that access to above‑threshold psychedelic states requires justification beyond clinical utility. Invoking principles of cognitive liberty, neurodiversity, and equitable access, the article recommends that decriminalization and supported adult‑use models accompany therapeutic frameworks to preserve the legal viability of non‑ordinary states of consciousness, even if below‑threshold medicines come to dominate future clinical practice
