Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University
Florida Agricultural & Mechanical University College of LawNot a member yet
884 research outputs found
Sort by
Stop WOKE Acts: How the Legislative Attack on CRT Harms Equality in Employment
Full text linkIn recent years, a growing media movement has publicized the concept of “wokeness” in America. Stopping wokeness is now a lightning rod for the political right and the political left, with the issue exploding from the traditional political arena to social circles, families, businesses, and even workplaces. The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines “woke” as being aware of and actively attentive to issues of racial and social justice. Prejudice and discrimination are not new concepts – they are the ancient obstacles in the path of society’s march towards equality. America’s journey on this path began with passing anti-discrimination legislation through the Civil War Era Constitutional Amendments, aimed at ensuring equality for African Americans, and the Civil Rights Act of 1866. Its successor, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which expanded protection against discrimination to include religious belief, sex, national origin, and familial status, represented the next mile marker on this journey. In the minds of many, its passing rectified the issue of discrimination entirely. In 2022, more than a dozen bills were proposed or enacted related to social and other issues, including “divisive concepts” like critical race theory. These anti-woke laws, aimed at individuals, education, and corporations, are used as political tools as America has become more politically polarized over issues from racial justice and LGBTQ rights to the environment and COVID-19 vaccines, and most recently abortion. This article examines how these anti-woke acts harm equality in America by examining the specifics of one of the first bills to pass into law. Florida’s recently enacted law dubbed the “Stop WOKE Act” prohibits an employer from conducting, as a condition of employment, training that it specifies as divisive, however, the actual intended effect of this training is to stop tackling issues of implicit bias and discrimination. This article explains the heart of the conflict between the Act and federal law, reasons for supporting anti-discrimination training, and the positive effects of preventative discrimination training in the workplace
Let the Sun Shine: Methods for Expansion of Small-Scale Solar Electricity to Reduce Fossil Fuel Dependence, Ease Financial Energy Burdens, and Enhance Community Resiliency
Full text linkWith so many benefits to solar electricity generation, it behooves state and local governments across America to explore laws and policies which encourage small-scale solar deployment. To help guide development of such laws and policies, Part I of this Article will explain the mechanics and the financing involved with the installation, operation, and maintenance of an on-site solar system. Part II explores the unique benefits and challenges of small-scale solar usage in low-income and weather vulnerable communities. Part III explains the legal and financial governance of American electric companies and how existing frameworks may lead utilities to erect hurdles to prevent on-site solar electricity generation. Part IV explores strategies, specifically laws and financing tools, used successfully by Hawaii, California, and Illinois to encourage widespread investment in on-site solar systems. Finally, Part V presents recommendations on how best to incorporate legal and political tools in jurisdictions seeking to expand use of small-scale solar, with an emphasis on benefiting low-income and weather vulnerable communities
Leandro v. State: The Challenges of Litigating School Funding Equity in Hyper-Partisan Times
Full text linkThe Leandro case serves as a critical case study highlighting the limitations of litigation in addressing educational inequities, particularly in states committed to undermining public education. Despite the judiciary\u27s constitutional role as an independent check on legislative actions, the politicization of state supreme courts has transformed them into partisan entities. This shift erodes public trust in the legal process and disproportionately harms marginalized groups, many of whom have historically relied on the courts to safeguard their constitutional rights, including equitable access to public education. The Leandro case underscores the challenges of achieving meaningful educational reform through litigation in a highly politicized environment
Big Brands Stay in Your Lane, Small Designers Made It First : An Examination of the Harmful Effects the Lack of Copyright Protection has on Small Apparel Designers
Full text linkThis paper aims to emphasize the importance of expanding current United States (“U.S.”) copyright law (“law”) to include protection for apparel designs, as the lack of such protection has a multitude of adverse consequences for small individual apparel designers (“small designer”)
Exceedingly Unpersuasive” - Discrimination, Transgender Students, and School Bathrooms
Full text linkThis Article is organized chronologically, in an effort to more effectively reflect the nearly identical fact patterns, timelines, and intersecting opinions of these cases. Part I provides the factual background of both cases. Part II summarizes the substantial preliminary litigation in Grimm; Part III examines the district court ruling in Adams; Part IV analyzes the summary judgment ruling in Grimm. Part V covers Adams’ first appellate ruling; Part VI discusses the Fourth Circuit’s ruling in Grimm three weeks later, and Part VII considers the aftermath of that decision. Parts VIII and IX explore the second panel ruling in Adams and the majority and dissenting en banc opinions, respectively. Part X considers the significant lessons from all these opinions and analyzes the relative strengths and weaknesses of the arguments for expanding or restricting the LGBTQ rights