University of Baltimore

University of Baltimore School of Law
Not a member yet
    4328 research outputs found

    Progress or Profit: Reconsidering the Shortened Statutory Period Scheme

    Get PDF

    University of Baltimore Law Forum, Volume 49, Number 1 (Fall 2018)

    Get PDF

    Recent Developments: Johnson v. State

    Get PDF

    Recent Developments: SVF Riva Annapolis, LLC v. Gilroy

    Get PDF

    University of Baltimore Law Forum, Volume 48, Number 2 (Spring 2018)

    Get PDF

    Recent Developments: Green v. State

    Get PDF

    Recent Developments: Lamalfa v. Hearn

    Get PDF

    THE ABOLITIONIST MOVEMENT COMES OF AGE: FROM CAPITAL PUNISHMENT AS A LAWFUL SANCTION TO A PEREMPTORY, INTERNATIONAL LAW NORM BARRING EXECUTIONS

    Get PDF
    The anti-death penalty movement is rooted in the Enlightenment, dating back to the publication of the Italian philosopher Cesare Beccaria’s treatise, Dei delitti e delle pene (1764). That book, later translated into English as An Essay on Crimes and Punishments (1767), has inspired anti-death penalty advocacy for more than 250 years. This Article traces the development of the abolitionist movement since Beccaria’s time. In particular, it highlights how the debate over capital punishment has shifted from one focused primarily on the severity of monarchical punishments, to deterrence, to one framed by the concept of universal human rights, including the right to life, human dignity, and the right to be free from torture and cruel and inhuman punishments. The Article describes the humble origins of the anti-death penalty movement and it discusses how that movement, which has seen many successes and setbacks, is now an international campaign led by multiple NGOs and scores of antideath penalty activists. After looking at the history of the movement and where it has already been, the Article examines where the anti-death penalty movement is likely heading in the years to come. It concludes that, in light of the immutable characteristics of death sentences and executions, the death penalty should be classified under the rubric of torture. While capital punishment was once universally accepted as a lawful sanction, the majority of the world’s nations no longer permit executions. The Article explores the cruel, inhuman, and torturous characteristics of the death penalty, and it encourages 21st-century opponents of capital punishment to continue their struggle to abolish the punishment of death

    How Will Technology Change Cities?

    Get PDF

    University of Baltimore Law Review, Volume 48, Issue 1, Fall 2018

    Get PDF

    4,014

    full texts

    4,328

    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    University of Baltimore School of Law
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Open Research Online? Become a CORE Member to access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard! 👇