University of Baltimore

University of Baltimore School of Law
Not a member yet
    4328 research outputs found

    Discharged and Discarded: The Collateral Consequences of a Less-Than-Honorable Discharge

    Get PDF
    Between 2011 and 2015, 57,141 soldiers, sailors, and airmen were separated from service with less-than-honorable (LTH) discharges for mi­nor misconduct related to mental health problems. These discharges dis­proportionately affected servicemembers of color. These veterans and others like them face daunting reintegration challenges when they return to civilian society, as federal agencies and state governments deny them the benefits that usually facilitate a veteran’s smooth transition to civilian society. This Essay adds to the scholarly discourse on military discharges by comparing these veterans’ plight to that of persons arrested or convicted of criminal offenses, who also suffer from collateral consequences related to their criminal records long after their involvement with the criminal legal system. Military review boards, the Department of Defense (DOD) agencies charged with reviewing and correcting veterans’ discharges after service, were never intended to address the collateral consequences of mil­itary discharges, and the laws governing discharge review do not provide the boards with the authority to do so; however, DOD may finally be poised to institute reforms. This Essay responds to DOD’s recent call for the mil­itary service branches to consider the collateral consequences of military discharges in reviewing veterans’ petitions for discharge upgrades. This Essay examines why current laws and regulations are inadequate to im­plement DOD’s call and asserts that reform efforts aimed at addressing the collateral consequences of arrests and convictions in the criminal le­gal system must be replicated in the military. This Essay concludes that, without reform, a permanent class of dishonored veterans will never suc­cessfully reintegrate into society

    Recent Developments: Rochkind v. Stevenson

    Get PDF

    Mainstreaming Restorative Justice and Therapeutic Jurisprudence Through Higher Education

    Get PDF

    Making Maryland a Sanctuary State – The Battle of Immigration Enforcement Throughout Maryland

    Get PDF

    Recent Developments: Plank v. Cherneski

    Get PDF

    It’s time to give marked-to-market taxation a try

    Get PDF

    Lifting The Veil by Covering It: European Prohibitions on the Practice of Veiling Constitute the Forced Covering of Muslim Women

    Get PDF

    Recent Developments: State v. Elzey

    Get PDF

    Rape Goes Cyber: Online Violations of Sexual Autonomy

    Get PDF

    A More Just, Inclusive Future for Sports

    Get PDF
    This issue of the Journal of Legal Aspects of Sport (JLAS) was dedicated to women in sports law, with a specific emphasis on inclusiveness and new ideas. For decades, the central focus of the law and policy directed to women and sports was Title IX enforcement and securing opportunities for participation. As we approach Title IX’s 50th anniversary, it is clear that the law has greatly expanded participation opportunities for women and powerfully altered the norms around women and sports. Nevertheless, much work remains. Women and girls still do not enjoy the full measure of equality that Title IX guarantees, and women’s sport at all levels still does not get the attention, resources, and respect that it should. The COVID-19 pandemic has only exacerbated this issue

    4,014

    full texts

    4,328

    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    University of Baltimore School of Law
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Open Research Online? Become a CORE Member to access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard! 👇