University of Baltimore

University of Baltimore School of Law
Not a member yet
    4328 research outputs found

    Recent Developments: State v. Miller

    Get PDF

    Constitutionality of Baltimore City\u27s Local Hiring Ordinance

    Get PDF

    University of Baltimore Law Review, Volume 52, Issue 1, Fall 2022

    Get PDF

    The Effect of Defendant Gender on Jurors’ Decision-Making

    Get PDF

    Finality, Fairness, and the Problem of Innocence in Maryland

    Get PDF

    Recent Developments: Att\u27y Grievance Comm\u27n of Md. v. Jackson

    Get PDF

    Recent Developments: In re D.D.

    Get PDF

    Recent Developments: Pabst Breweing Co. v. Frederick P. Winner, Ltd.

    Get PDF

    Beyond Window Dressing: Public Participation for Marginalized Communities in the Datafied Society

    Get PDF
    We live in a datafied society in which our personal data is being constantly harvested, analyzed, and sold by public and private entities, and yet we have little control over our data and little voice in how it is used. In light of the impacts of algorithmic decision-making systems—including those that run on machine learning and artificial intelligence—there are increasing calls to integrate public participation into the adoption, design, and oversight of these tech tools. Stakeholder input is particularly crucial for members of marginalized groups, who bear the disproportionate harms of data-centric technologies. Yet, recent calls for public participation have been mostly hortatory and without specific strategies or realistic recommendations. As this Article explains, policy makers need not operate from a blank slate. For decades, a variety of American statutory regimes have mandated public participation, such as in the areas of environmental law, land use law, and anti-poverty programs. Such mandates have had outsized effects on communities suffering from economic disadvantage and racial and ethnic discrimination. This Article contends that we should examine these regulatory mandates in thinking about how to include the perspectives of marginalized stakeholders in the datafied society. The core takeaway is that meaningful public participation is extremely challenging and does not happen without intentional and inclusive design. At its best, public input can improve outputs and empower stakeholders. At its worst, it operates as a form of “window dressing,” in which marginalized communities have no real power to effect outcomes, thus generating distrust and alienation. Case studies show that meaningful public participation is most likely to result when there are hard-law requirements for public participation and when decision-makers operate transparently and recognize the value of the public’s expertise. In addition, impacted communities must be provided with capacity-building tools and resources to support their engagement. As legislative proposals to enhance tech accountability—through algorithmic impact assessments, audits, and other tools—gain steam, we must heed these lessons

    Addressing Parental Denial of Gender Dysphoria Treatment Under Maryland\u27s Child Abuse and Neglect Laws

    Get PDF

    4,014

    full texts

    4,328

    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    University of Baltimore School of Law
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Open Research Online? Become a CORE Member to access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard! 👇