Joint Institute for Laboratory Astrophysics

Colorado Law
Not a member yet
    46622 research outputs found

    Twilight of the American State

    No full text

    Immigration Enforcement Preemption

    Get PDF
    The Supreme Court\u27s 2012 decision, Arizona v. United States, turned back the most robust and brazen state regulation of immigration in recent memory, striking down several provisions of Arizona\u27s omnibus enforcement law. Notably, the Court did not limit preemption inquiries to conflicts between the state law and congressional statutes. The Court also based its decision on the tension between the state law and Executive Branch enforcement policies. The landmark decision seemed to have settled the Court\u27s approach to immigration enforcement federalism. Yet, a scant eight years after Arizona, in Kansas v. Garcia, the Court upheld Kansas\u27s prosecutions of noncitizens who used stolen identities to procure employment in violation of federal immigration law. In so doing, the majority opinion took aim at Arizona\u27s central premise, rejecting the relevance of presidential enforcement in immigration preemption. This Article provides an urgently needed reappraisal of immigration preemption in the wake of Kansas. My primary claim is that immigration preemption requires a framework that accounts for the diminishing relevance of formal law, the discretionary enforcement options available to federal authorities, and the inherent liabilities associated with unauthorized status. I argue that presidential enforcement practices as a distillation of competing statutory values, congressional appropriations, executive policy preferences, and allocation of agency resources limn federal policy for immigration preemption purposes. In defending this claim, this Article recasts immigration preemption decisions from the past fifty years, revealing a long-standing judicial concern for federal enforcement practices. Second, this Article critiques Kansas for discounting federal enforcement practices, and defends a return to Arizona-like jurisprudence. Finally, it argues that this approach will not unduly aggrandize judicial or executive power, or imbalance federal-state authority over criminal enforcement

    Catch and Release Jurisdiction

    No full text

    Concerning The Creation Of The Emergency Rental Assistance Grant Program Withinthe Department Of Local Affairs For The Purpose Of Providing Emergency Rentalassistance During The State Fiscal Year

    No full text
    https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/session-laws-2001-2050/10513/thumbnail.jp

    Front Matter

    Get PDF

    Contents

    Get PDF

    Blockchain Wakes: Balancing the Light and Dark Sides of Blockchain Through Global Regulation

    Get PDF

    Senate Journal History

    Get PDF
    https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/colorado-house-and-senate-journals/1600/thumbnail.jp

    Subject Index

    Get PDF
    https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/colorado-house-and-senate-journals/1603/thumbnail.jp

    Triples and the Grammar of Control

    No full text

    43,658

    full texts

    46,622

    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    Colorado Law
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Open Research Online? Become a CORE Member to access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard! 👇