1412 research outputs found
Sort by
Thirty-Fourth Annual Hooding and Graduation Ceremony (2012)
https://scholarship.law.campbell.edu/commencement/1001/thumbnail.jp
Of Chew Toys and Designer Handbags: A Critical Analysis of the “Parody” Exception under the U.S. Trademark Dilution Revision Act
The Rise and Decline of the Intellectual Property Powers
Since its reopening to foreign trade in the late 1990s, China has been the poster child of intellectual property piracy and counterfeiting. Virtually every year, the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) lists China on its watch list or priority watch list. The country’s piracy and counterfeiting problems have also been frequently mentioned in connection with international intellectual property enforcement initiatives, such as the highly controversial Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) and the equally problematic domestic legislative proposals for heightened copyright enforcement. In a recent report, the International Trade Commission estimated that “firms in the U.S. [intellectual property]–intensive economy that conducted business in China in 2009 reported losses of approximately $48.2 billion in sales, royalties, or license fees due to [intellectual property rights] infringement in China.
Beyond the Crossroads: Shackled by Liberty, Tyrannized by Equality (Book Review: Slouching Towards Gomorrah)
Review of SLOUCHING TOWARDS GOMORRAH by Robert Bor
Domestic Relations - Separation Agreements: Effect of Resumed Marital Relations
Since 1890, the settled law of North Carolina has been that the resumption of marital relations will void a separation agreement to the extent that such an agreement remains executory. However, the definition of resumption of marital relations has remained uncertain. The North Carolina Supreme Court has held that a husband and wife resuming cohabitation and holding themselves out as living together as man and wife had resumed the marital relationship even without their engaging in sexual intercourse. The North Carolina Court of Appeals has held that resumption of sexual activity between estranged spouses does not void a separation agreement without a finding that both parties intended to resume marital relations. In Murphy v. Murphy the North Carolina Supreme Court rejected the court of appeals\u27 requirement of intent and held that sexual intercourse between a husband and wife after the execution of a separation agreement avoids the contract. \u27 This note will examine the rationale behind and implications of the Murphy decision