1412 research outputs found
Sort by
The Evolving Role of the Corporate Counsel: How Information Technology is Reinventing Legal Practice
Featured Speaker Presentation: Examining Hurdles and Execution Difficulties for Implementation of Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Restorative Justice in America
North Carolina\u27s Wary Reception of Drug Treatment Court: The Myth of Inherent Ethics Violations Within Its Structure
Evidence - Admissibility of Expert Opinion
The North Carolina Supreme Court made significant progress toward resolving the uncertainty in the law on the admissibility of medical expert opinion evidence in State v. Wade. Since State v. David, the rule in North Carolina was that an expert must base his opinion testimony on either (1) personal knowledge or observation or (2) a hypothetical question addressed to him, in which the pertinent facts are assumed to be true, or rather, assumed to be so found by the jury. After David several cases were decided which liberalized the rule considerably while others held fast to David. Without having overruled or reconciled any of these cases, the Court appeared to have a convenient precedent for the next decision, whatever its tenor may be. The next decision, which fell in line with and clarified the line of cases which more liberally allowed admission of expert opinion evidence, was Wade. The Court held that a medical expert may testify to the information on which he based his opinion, even though obtained from the patient himself, provided the information is inherently reliable
Workers\u27 Compensation - You Take (45% of) My Breath Away
This comment will examine the standards the North Carolina appellate courts have developed to determine whether a workers\u27 compensation claimant is entitled to relief for an occupational disease under subsection thirteen, as well as the rules governing apportionment of liability in claims arising under the Act. Finally, the Morrison decision will be considered in light of previous decisional law and standards adopted in the majority of jurisdictions