Mitchell Hamline School of Law
Not a member yet
    3445 research outputs found

    School Finance Litigation and the Separation of Powers

    Get PDF

    WOTUS: The Water Definition Battle that Defines the Nation

    Get PDF

    Animal Rights: Time to Start Unpacking What Rights and for Whom

    Get PDF

    Social Media and Censorship: Rethinking State Action Once Again

    Get PDF

    Mentally Ill, or Mentally Ill and Dangerous?: Rethinking Civil Commitments in Minnesota

    Get PDF

    Cybaris® Introduction - In Memoriam

    No full text

    Convicting Juveniles to Life Without Parole

    Get PDF
    When does a juvenile legally become an adult? This is literally a life-or-death question because the United States Supreme Court held that the Constitution prohibits the imposition of capital punishment on a juvenile. Despite the enormous consequences, the Supreme Court has spent little time defining what it means to be a juvenile. Instead, the Court has simply accepted the relatively recently adopted conventional wisdom that a person is considered an adult on his or her eighteenth birthday. But there is no rational or scientific basis for drawing the line between being an adult and being a juvenile at age eighteen. Indeed, recent scientific research—the same brain research the United States Supreme Court has used to adopt legal principles that both protect and harm adolescents—proves that brain maturation actually occurs from ages ten to twenty-seven. This article will explore whether the line between a juvenile and an adult should remain at eighteen. It begins by exploring the history of distinguishing childhood from adulthood. Next, this article details the legal system’s differing treatment of certain ages. Then, it details the criminal justice system’s treatment of persons below the age of eighteen. Next, this article discusses the science behind cognitive development. Then, it discusses Supreme Court decisions that affect rights of individuals based on age. Finally, the article concludes that drawing the line of adulthood at age eighteen without consideration of an individual’s characteristics is arbitrary under the Constitution

    Limited Liability Limited

    Get PDF
    Limited liability companies went mainstream in 1988, began to capture the market for closely held businesses in 1997, and now have the lion’s share of that market. Since the advent of limited liability companies, a corporate-like liability shield, in addition to pass-through status under federal income tax law, has been one of two hallmarks of a limited liability company. Indeed, for many years courts have described the limited liability company as “a hybrid business entity [that] provides members with limited liability to the same extent enjoyed by corporate shareholders.” The LLC shield should therefore be easy to understand: a limited liability company shields its members in essentially the same way as a corporation shields its shareholders. Yet courts and practitioners still occasionally misunderstand the intended purpose and proper effect of the LLC shield. This article seeks “to make clear beyond peradventure” the proper purpose and intended effect of the LLC shield

    Partisan Gerrymandering: Blurring The Line Between Law And Politics

    Get PDF

    3,295

    full texts

    3,445

    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    Mitchell Hamline School of Law
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Open Research Online? Become a CORE Member to access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard! 👇