3400 research outputs found
Sort by
Unlicensed to Work: An Analysis of the United States\u27 Human Rights Violation Against Asylum Seekers Due to the Unreasonable Waiting Period for Work Authorization, and How the Nation Forfeits an Economic Opportunity in the Process
Full text linkEntertaining and Embracing Professional Identity Development in the 1L Legal Writing Curriculum
Full text link
Oklahoma Criminal Law and Procedure with Forms
No full textOklahoma Criminal Law and Procedure with Forms covers both the entire process of a criminal trial and the substantive criminal law in Oklahoma.
Each chapter combines authoritative legal analysis with an expert author’s practical insights, distilled from years of litigation practice. Additionally, Oklahoma Criminal Law and Procedure with Forms includes a multitude of sample forms to complement your practice.https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/books/1050/thumbnail.jp
Resilient Cities and the Housing Trust
No full textIn the 1970’s, cities across the United States faced new obstacles due to the deterioration of public infrastructure. Public housing projects that were built through federal housing initiatives were reaching the end of their lives after less than twenty years of being in service. Over the last forty years, cities in the United States have turned increasingly to housing trust funds to address the conjoined problems of the withdrawal of federal resources dedicated to affordable housing provision, and insufficient public housing infrastructure
Reassessing Administrative Finality: The Importance of New Evidence and Changed Circumstances
No full textAdministrative finality of agency action is generally thought of as a method of avoiding premature judicial review—a claim that the review is too early. But it is also used to prevent judicial review by claiming that the review has now come too late. There are two primary exceptions to this prohibition: new evidence and changed circumstances. However, courts and agencies are reluctant to permit challengers to use these exceptions as often as should be statutorily allowed, an area that scholarship has been neglected.
This Article fills the gap by exploring this aspect of administrative finality, looking at the important government interests the doctrine safeguards, as well as both the individual and government interests counseling against finality in these changed circumstances. It reaches the conclusion that the doctrine is being applied too strictly, examining recent cases involving both disability and immigration where it has prevented proper review of the agency decision at issue
