2622 research outputs found
Sort by
PREVIEW; United States v. Campbell: \u3cem\u3e Rocky Mountain High – The Ninth Circuit’s Chance to Concentrate on the Definition of Marijuana \u3c/em\u3e
Full text linkPanel No. 3 – Reframing Regulation and Enforcement in the Consumer Space
No full textPanel No. 3 – Reframing Regulation and Enforcement in the Consumer Space
Moderated by Jim Molloy
Jacob Rooksby & Kathryn Handick – COVID-19 and Corporate Social Responsibility
Amy Widman – Protecting Consumer Protection: Filling the Federal Enforcement Gap
Diane Thompson – Pay Attention! Regulatory Advocacy, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and Marginalized Communitie
County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund
Full text linkThe Supreme Court of the United States was recently asked to decide whether the Clean Water Act requires a permit for the discharge of pollutants that originate from a point source but are conveyed to navigable waters by a nonpoint source. Vacating the Ninth Circuit’s “fairly traceable” test, the Court held the Clean Water Act requires a permit when there is a direct discharge of pollutants from a point source into navigable waters or when there is the “functional equivalent of a direct discharge.
