Humane Society Institute for Science and Policy
Not a member yet
    6329 research outputs found

    Kona-Boun_Jeab-Jacques

    No full text
    https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/animsent_gallery/1572/thumbnail.jp

    FawcettAnne&Yuuki

    No full text
    https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/animsent_gallery/1557/thumbnail.jp

    Schuck-PalmCynthia

    No full text
    https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/animsent_gallery/1556/thumbnail.jp

    HarleyHeidi

    No full text
    https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/animsent_gallery/1545/thumbnail.jp

    Sevillano

    No full text

    Mallatt

    No full text
    https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/animsent_gallery/1155/thumbnail.jp

    Institutional animal care and use committees and the challenges of evaluating animal research proposals

    No full text
    In the U.S. and many other countries, oversight committee approval is a common requirement for conducting research and publishing its findings. However, in evaluating whether research aims could have been achieved by methods other than the use of animals, these committees face a challenging task. In the U.S., there is no requirement that committee members have expertise in the research areas under review or in methods that could replace animal use, nor could expertise in such vast technical areas be expected. Consideration of alternatives to painful procedures is not required at all for experiments on animals not covered by the Animal Welfare Act. Funding institutions and scientific journals should not use institutional committee approval of submissions as evidence of adherence to ethical guidelines beyond those legally required. Suggestions for more robust consideration of nonanimal methods and improvements in the review process are provided

    From Performative to Transformative: Navigating Equity & Inclusion Across a Diverse Animal Advocacy Movement

    No full text
    The purpose of this study is to understand how animal advocates and non-advocates who are Black, Indigenous, or People of Color (BIPOC), along with leaders of U.S. farmed animal advocacy organizations, perceive inclusion in the U.S. farmed animal protection movement. Based on interviews with BIPOC and non-BIPOC participants, we aim to identify potential opportunities and barriers for the creation of a more inclusive farmed animal protection movement

    Exploring The Impacts Of Food System Education: A Case Study

    No full text
    This case study, involving qualitative and quantitative methods, explores the long-term impacts of an education program that trains students in effective communication, advocacy, and leadership skills to combat factory farming. The results from this study will shed light on the effectiveness and value of educational programs for the animal protection movement and for the students who partake in them

    How AZA zoos and aquariums are helping to fill the gap

    No full text
    Oldfield & Bonano (2024) identify significant gaps in scientific knowledge about certain animal taxa, such as reptiles, amphibians, invertebrates, and fish. Despite some efforts, published literature remains limited, forcing decision-makers to rely more on experiential knowledge than scientific evidence. AZA-accredited zoos and aquariums are uniquely positioned to bridge these gaps and advance animal welfare science by fostering collaboration, building partnerships, and promoting multi-disciplinary approaches to welfare assessments

    0

    full texts

    6,329

    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    Humane Society Institute for Science and Policy
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Open Research Online? Become a CORE Member to access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard! 👇