43674 research outputs found
Sort by
Jodi Howick Appellant v. Salt Lake City Corporation, Appellee
Get PDFAppeal from the third District court, Salt Lake County, State of Utah The Honorable Richard D. McKelvi
State of Utah, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Robert Peter Mendez, Defendant/Appellant
Get PDFAppeal from a judgement entered in the Fifth Judicial district Court of Utah, Washington County, Honorable G. Michael Westfal
Unpatriotic Profit: How For-Profit Colleges Target Veterans and What the Government Must Do to Stop Them
Get PDF
Law Library / JRCB from the northwest (2017)
No full textA photograph of the west wall of the law building, taken from the Heritage Drive fountain.https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/main_slideshow/1011/thumbnail.jp
Comments on James C. Phillips & Jesse Egbert, Advancing Law and Corpus Linguistics: Importing Principles and Practices from Survey and Content-Analysis Methodologies to Improve Corpus Design and Analysis
Get PDFCYBER!
Get PDFThis Article challenges the basic assumptions of the emerging legal area of “cyber” or “cybersecurity.” It argues that the two dominant “cybersecurity” paradigms—information sharing and deterrence—fail to recognize that corporate information security and national “cybersecurity” concerns are inextricable. This problem of “reciprocal security vulnerability” means that in practice our current legal paradigms channel us in suboptimal directions. Drawing insights from the work of philosopher of science Michael Polanyi, this Article identifies three flaws that pervade the academic and policy analysis of security, exacerbating the problem of reciprocal security vulnerability—privacy conflation, incommensurability, and internet exceptionalism. It then offers a new paradigm—reciprocal security. Reciprocal security reframes information security law and policy as part of broader security policy, focusing on two key elements: security vigilance infrastructure and defense primacy. The Article concludes by briefly introducing five sets of concrete legal and policy proposals embodying the new reciprocal security paradigm
Deceptive Patents: Deconstructing Juicy Whip
Get PDFMoral utility largely prevents the granting of a patent if the patent would be injurious to the well-being of society. The moral utility doctrine has prevailed through much of American patent history and still endures in many parts of the world. In Juicy Whip I, the Federal Circuit chose to abandon the doctrine, but the court’s rationale in support of the decision was ill-suited. The court’s holding sanctioned deceptive patent applications but, intentionally or unintentionally, neglected applicable unfair competition, free speech, and consumer deception doctrines. In light of the Intellectual Property Clause of the U.S. Constitution, deceptive patents should be barred, because they convey no inherently useful qualities beyond deceiving consumers
State of Utah, Plain Tiff/Petitioner, v. James Christopher McCallie, Defendant/Respondent.
Get PDFOn Writ of Certiorari to the Utah Court of Appeal