Marquette University

Marquette University Law School
Not a member yet
    7078 research outputs found

    Table of Contents

    Get PDF

    It’s Time to Put Character Back into the Character-Evidence Rule

    Get PDF
    Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b), which governs the admissibility of other-acts evidence, is a mess, and recently-promulgated amendments will not fix it. The amendments fail to address the two major problems underlying Rule 404(b). First, the rule is based on a categorical judgment about the relative probative value and unfair prejudice of other-acts evidence when offered as character evidence; that is, to prove the defendant acted in accordance with his or her character. In numerous cases, however, other-acts evidence is highly probative and the rule’s categorical judgment is decidedly wrong. Not surprisingly, courts often admit such evidence, typically by erroneously denying that the evidence is being offered to prove the defendant acted in accordance with his or her character. The second problem exacerbates the first. Although the rule prohibits only character evidence, no one knows what character means. Neither the case law nor the rules define character in any meaningful way. Consequently, we have a body of case law that authorizes the admission of not only high-probative-value other-acts evidence but also precisely the type of low-probative-value other-acts evidence that Rule 404(b) was designed to exclude

    Compassion: a Critical Skill for Law Students

    Get PDF

    RICO had a Birthday! A Fifty-Year Retrospective of Questions Answered and Open

    Get PDF
    The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) came into the world in 1970, a time of great social upheaval that was accompanied by shifting attitudes towards both crime and civil litigation. From the outset, the statute’s complexity, ambiguity, and uncertain purpose have confounded courts and commentators. At least some doubts as to the statute’s meaning and application arise because it has criminal and civil components that subject it to the twin—yet antithetical—social impulses to be “tough on crime” while containing a perceived “litigation explosion.” In this Article, I situate RICO in this larger context and offer that context as a partial explanation of how RICO’s “meaning” has been shaped. Along the way, I synthesize many years of my own legal scholarship and litigation experience into a retrospective of where RICO interpretation and application have been—and where they still must go

    Brain Chips and Whole Brain Emulation Could Ensure Football\u27s Survival: Is It Worthwhile?

    Get PDF

    Should Your Wearables Be Shareable? The Ethics of Wearable Technology in Collegiate Athletics

    Get PDF

    Orange is the News Blackout: The First Amendment and Media Access to Jails

    Get PDF
    None

    This Toothless Court: Judicial Review in Wisconsin Post-Mayo

    Get PDF
    None

    0

    full texts

    0

    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    Marquette University Law School
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Open Research Online? Become a CORE Member to access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard! 👇