International Computer Science Institute

Berkeley Law
Not a member yet
    573882 research outputs found

    Wie wissenschaftlich ist die Rechtswissenschaft? ::Tagung des Jungen Forums Rechtsphilosophie (JFR) im September 2024 in Bayreuth /

    No full text
    "In vier thematisch gegliederten Abschnitten widmen sich Nachwuchswissenschaftler:innen zentralen Aspekten juristischer Wissenschaftlichkeit: der Struktur rechtswissenschaftlicher Theoriebildung, dem Verhältnis von Normativität und Empirie, den Grenzen klassischer Methodik sowie den Herausforderungen durch KI und Sprache im Recht. Die Beiträge greifen auf rechtsphilosophische, wissenschaftstheoretische, linguistische und argumentationstheoretische Zugänge zurück. Dabei zeigt sich: Die Rechtswissenschaft ist kein abgeschlossenes System, sondern ein offenes, sich wandelndes Erkenntnisfeld. Ihre Wissenschaftlichkeit ist keine Selbstverständlichkeit - sie muss stets neu begründet, diskutiert und weiterentwickelt werden. Ein Band für alle, die das juristische Denken hinterfragen, vertiefen und in seinen methodischen Grundlagen verstehen wollen."-

    Tosanpŏp =:Insolvency law /

    No full text

    Ch'injok sangsokpŏp kangŭi /

    No full text

    New commentaries on the laws of England ::partly founded on Blackstone /

    No full text

    Los americanos en Cuba /

    No full text

    Fundamental rights violations by private actors and the procedure before the European Court of Human Rights ::a study of verticalised cases /

    No full text
    Article 34 of the European Convention on Human Rights prescribes that individual applications must be directed against one of the Convention States. Consequently, private actors involved in proceedings against other private actors before domestic courts must complain about State (in)action in their application to the European Court of Human Rights. In other words, originally 'horizontal' conflicts must be 'verticalised' in order to be admissible. Although such verticalised cases make up a large portion of the Court's case law, the particular nature of these cases, as well as procedural issues that may arise in them, has not received much attention. To fill this gap, this book offers a detailed examination of verticalised cases coming before the Court. The characteristics of and the Court's approach to verticalised cases are explored by means of an in-depth analysis of four types of verticalised cases (cases related to one's surroundings; cases involving a conflict between the right to reputation and private life and the right to freedom of expression; family life cases; and employer-employee cases). On the basis of this analysis, it is argued that the Court's current approach to verticalised cases poses problems for private actors, Convention States and the Court itself. In presenting recommendations for the resolution of these problems, the book concludes with a proposal for a new approach to verticalised cases, consisting of a redesigned third-party intervention procedure

    14,333

    full texts

    573,882

    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    Berkeley Law is based in United States
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Open Research Online? Become a CORE Member to access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard! 👇