573882 research outputs found
Sort by
Is mandatory retirement morally defensible? ::ethics, economics, and law in ageing societies /
No full text"The topic of banning mandatory retirement has sparked debate as ageing populations transform societies. Comparing ageism to sexism and racism, this book addresses the philosophical concerns of age discrimination, as well as the ethical and social considerations of personal dignity, economic efficiency, and employment insecurity. This edited volume fosters theoretical discourse by drawing on interdisciplinary conceptual frameworks from philosophy, ethics, economics, social work, and law. Distinguished contributors-including philosophers, bioethicists, social scientists, and legal experts-critically examine Lazear's influential theory of mandatory retirement. They also develop compelling comparisons between mandatory retirement policies and the Victorian Factory Acts and analyze how prohibiting mandatory retirement could substantially benefit workers in mainland China and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR). This title is essential reading for scholars and students of practical ethics, bioethics, public policy, labour and public economics, social work, and employment law"-- Provided by publisher
Epistolae (manuscript). Series of 217 manuscript letters written by Cardinal Domenico Riviera (1671-1752), between 1711-1716, while he was Secretary for the Consistorial Congregation of the College of Cardinals and the Congregation of the Sacred See, under the Pontificate of Clement XI.
No full textSite Fidelity and Legal Harm: How Wildlands v. Scott Timber Reaffirms Protections for Marbled Murrelets Under the ESA
No full text
Empowering energy consumers in the EU : legal pathways for promoting renewable electricity through demand-side management.
No full text
In the Supreme Court of the United States, Michael J. Bost, et al., petitioners, v. Illinois State Board of Elections and Bernadette Matthews, in her official capacity as the executive director of the Illinois State Board of Elections, respondents ::on petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit : petitioners' reply brief /
No full textThe question presented is, do federal candidates have Article III standing to challenge state laws that allow mail-in ballots to be received and counted for two weeks after Election Day based on claims that such laws dilute their votes and force them to incur additional campaign expenses for extended ballot monitoring
