Southern Methodist University

Southern Methodist University
Not a member yet
    18736 research outputs found

    On Snow\u27s Intellectual Property and Immorality

    Get PDF
    In this Essay, I consider the “why” and “how” of Professor Snow’s controversial, countercultural, important, and relevant position that immorality may result in the denial of intellectual property protection. First, I highlight how surprising it is that Professor Snow’s argument springs from the theories underlying intellectual property protection, rather than the theories underlying the morality and ethics he believes ought to be considered in determining intellectual property protection. No one (that I know, at least) goes to the Environmental Protection Agency seeking better regulations to protect the environment and uses the labor desert theory of property rights as an argument. I would expect to see arguments against protective regulations to be based on Lockean theories about ownership of the fruit of labor. But, upon reflection, Professor Snow’s argument is not just surprising, it is persuasive. Second, I consider Professor Snow’s proposal for how morality and ethics might be injected into intellectual property enforcement. Professor Snow and I seem to agree that judicial discretion is not the best way to incorporate morality into the determination of what creative works deserve intellectual property protection. But we part ways with respect to his position that it is prudent for judges to consider morality in intellectual property cases based on the Constitution’s Intellectual Property Clause. In the end, I conclude that Congress and the President should enact legislation— or to be more precise amend the patent statute—when necessary to address moral aspects of inventions with clarity and precision

    Cross-Border Real Estate

    Get PDF

    International Art and Cultural Heritage Law

    Get PDF

    International Section Ethics Committee

    Get PDF

    National Security Law

    Get PDF

    Enhancing Animal Shelter Operations with Time Series and Machine Learning

    Get PDF
    Enhancing animal shelter operations through machine learning involves employing a variety of advanced techniques aimed at increasing efficiency, promoting animal welfare, and optimizing resource allocation. This paper explores predictive analytics for adoption rates using regression models to estimate the likelihood of adoption based on historical data, encompassing variables such as breed, health status, and previous adoption trends. Additionally, classification algorithms are utilized to categorize animals by adoption probability, facilitating better resources and marketing prioritization. Clustering algorithms are employed to group animals according to behavior patterns and/or physical health, enabling tailored medical care and enrichment activities that improve their mental and physical well-being. Time series (ARIMA) forecasting is applied to predict future animal intake capacity influencing inventory management and room allocation. Random forest and neural networks (LSTM) are integrated as supplemental predictive models, offering deep learning capabilities for more complex data patterns and serve as an additional tool in shelter decision-making processes. A key goal of this research is to reduce overcrowding/euthanasia rates, increase adoption rates, and increase Return to Owner (RTO) rates at the Dallas Animal Shelter by forecasting animal intake and predicting length of stay. The integration of these machine learning methodologies demonstrates enhancements in the operational effectiveness of animal shelters, ensuring that both animal care and resource utilization are maintained athigh standards. The findings highlight the potential of these techniques to enhance shelter management, promote more successful adoption outcomes, and reduce overcrowding/euthanasia rates

    Procedural Generated World With History Simulation and 3D Map

    No full text
    The procedurally generated world with history simulation tool dynamically generates customizable, seed-driven virtual worlds through algorithmic processes. Using Voronoi diagrams (constructed via Fortune’s algorithm) for spatial partitioning, it creates diverse geographic features such as lands, oceans, and heights. Climate systems, hydrology (rivers, precipitation), and temperature data are procedurally derived from the terrain data. The tool further simulates sociopolitical dynamics, including population distribution, cultural evolution, religious spread, and diplomatic interactions between procedurally generated nations. Cities, towns, roads, and products emerge organically based on province data. Users can interactively modify generated worlds—adjusting province geographic data, reshaping cultural or religious distribution, or changing province owner—before exporting structured data (saved as XML) for compatibility with external applications

    Felon-in-Possession Laws After \u3cem\u3eBruen\u3c/em\u3e and the War on Drugs

    No full text
    The legal landscape surrounding firearm possession is evolving rapidly. In 2022, the Supreme Court accelerated its expansion of the individual right to bear arms under the Second Amendment in New York Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen. Since Bruen, courts around the country have struck down nearly all types of firearm regulations, with a notable exception: felon-in-possession laws. This Article examines the implications of a legal landscape where those who have prior felony convictions, and especially prior drug convictions, are punished harshly for the same behavior—possession of a firearm—that is constitutionally protected for nearly everyone else. I argue that as the Second Amendment expands to protect more and more firearm possession, a dichotomy has arisen in which those who live in the communities most heavily targeted by the War on Drugs of the 1980s and 1990s are increasingly becoming virtually the only Americans for whom firearm possession is illegal. I examine the history and development of felon-in-possession statutes to show that they were not enacted with a clear purpose and are not narrowly tailored to criminalize the most dangerous behavior. Further, I show how existing federal enforcement priorities and the structure of the United States Sentencing Guidelines compound the harms of the War on Drugs by punishing individuals with prior drug offenses most harshly, even when there is limited evidence to suggest that they pose the greatest danger from firearm possession. The Supreme Court recently confirmed that the Second Amendment permits individuals who pose a danger to the community to be disarmed in United States v. Rahimi. The question of how to determine who poses such a danger will be the next threshold of Second Amendment jurisprudence. I argue that as our understanding of the Second Amendment evolves, prosecutors and legislators must be cognizant of the lasting effects of the War on Drugs and question the assumption that any prior felony conviction is an accurate proxy for dangerousness

    Dismantling the \u27Master’s House\u27: Building a \u27World House\u27 Curriculum for Twenty-First-Century U.S. Protestant Theological Education

    No full text
    Audre Lorde proclaimed four decades ago, “For the master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house.” As a self-identified “Black, lesbian, feminist, socialist, poet, and mother,” Lorde fearlessly resisted White, heteronormative, patriarchal, hegemonic, and “pseudo-master” frameworks that were institutionally and structurally embedded within society. Lorde’s timeless, provocative, and even prophetic utterances continue to echo today and hold relevance within the theological academy. This dissertation builds upon Lorde’s powerful metaphor by arguing that twenty-first-century Protestant theological education in the United States is the “master’s house.” The master’s house must be dismantled because its core commitments—definitional, pedagogical, institutional, and curricular—are one-dimensionally oriented and Eurocentrically expressed. Specifically, this dissertation employs Critical Race Theory as a justice-oriented, methodological prism to expose various problems within the architectural and infrastructural frameworks of the master’s house. These issues include systemic racism, the prioritization of theory (science) over practice, the erasures or silencing of certain people, cultures, and histories, the presence of masculine civilizing ideals, language laced with ethnocentric, androcentric, and Eurocentric biases found in Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher’s nineteenth-century Brief Outline, “master scripts,” “racial paterfamilias spirits,” and “white ghosts of theological oppression,” as well as other persistent harms embedded in its curriculum that continue to influence theological education. Nevertheless, other problems persist. Studies from The Association of Theological Schools, the accrediting agency for theological schools in the United States and Canada, reveal that people of color will constitute the majority of students in theological education by 2040. Despite evidence of these demographic shifts, the ATS’s curriculum and other structural components of theological institutions lag behind this changing landscape, leaving them unprepared to engage with a multiracial society or confront the global issues it faces. Therefore, this dissertation’s thesis posits that the one-dimensionally oriented and Eurocentrically expressed curriculum governing the “master’s house” of twenty-first-century U.S. Protestant theological education must undergo a “curricular transformation” by adopting a model inspired by the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s vision for a “great world house,” focusing on the hopes and “pains in society” as the foundation for the “formal” curriculum, welcoming “an array of epistemologies and histories,” and embracing the D-E-I (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) in the Imago Dei while exploring how theological education can actively participate in genuinely shaping and improving the world

    17,139

    full texts

    18,736

    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    Southern Methodist University
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Open Research Online? Become a CORE Member to access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard! 👇