Miami University, Ohio
Not a member yet
805 research outputs found
Sort by
Self-report measures of individual differences in regulatory focus: a cautionary note
Regulatory focus theory distinguishes between two independent structures of strategic inclination,
promotion versus prevention. However, the theory implies two potentially independent definitions
of these inclinations, the self-guide versus the reference-point definitions. Two scales (the
Regulatory Focus Questionnaire [Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R. S., Harlow, R. E., Idson, L. C.,
Ayduk, O. N., & Taylor, A. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success:
Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 3–23] and
the General Regulatory Focus Measure [Lockwood, P., Jordan, C. H., & Kunda, Z. (2002). Motivation
by positive and negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 854–864]) have been widely used to measure dispositional
regulatory focus. We suggest that these two scales align respectively with the two definitions,
and find that the two scales are largely uncorrelated. Both conceptual and methodological implications
are discussed
Recruiting and retaining frontline workers in long-term care : usual organizational practices in Ohio
Protecting human participants in long-term care research : the role of state law and policy
This report examines the role of specific state legislative, administrative, and common law and public policy in protecting older long-term care consumers who are or may become participants in research studies