Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

Digitale Hochschulschriften der LMU
Not a member yet
    22455 research outputs found

    Strukturierte Befundung von CT-Untersuchungen des Thorax unter Verwendung der CO-RADS-Klassifikation

    Get PDF

    Essays in public economics and on equality of opportunity

    Get PDF
    The dissertation consists of four independent empirical essays. The first chapter analyzes to what extent firms adjust their investment plans to higher tax rates, based on municipality level variation in business tax rates in Germany. The further chapters deal with the measurement of equality of opportunity. Chapter 2 develops a new approach to measuring social mobility in Germany. Chapter 3 characterizes equality of opportunity in the joint distribution of income and wealth in the USA. The final chapter documents new relationships between socio-economic status, career preferences, and future income and labor market participation. The results suggest that such career preferences may play an important role in the intergenerational transmission of socio-economic status.Die Dissertation besteht aus vier eigenständigen empirischen Aufsätzen. Das erste Kapitel untersucht auf der Grundlage von Gewerbesteuererhöhungen auf Gemeindeebene in Deutschland, inwieweit Unternehmen ihre Investitionspläne an höhere Steuersätze anpassen. Die weiteren Kapitel befassen sich mit der Messung von Chancengerechtigkeit. Kapitel 2 entwickelt einen neuen Ansatz zur Messung von sozialer Mobilität in Deutschland. Kapitel 3 charakterisiert Chancengerechtigkeit in der gemeinsamen Verteilung von Einkommen und Vermögen in den USA. Das letzte Kapitel dokumentiert neue Zusammenhänge zwischen sozioökonomischem Status, Präferenzen bei der Berufswahl, und zukünftigen Einkommen und Arbeitsmarktbeteiligung. Die Ergebnisse deuten darauf hin, dass Berufswahlpräferenzen eine wichtige Rolle bei der generationsübergreifenden Weitergabe von sozioökonomischem Status spielen

    Firms and innovation

    Get PDF

    Smartphone-basiertes Screening von Vorhofflimmern (eBRAVE-AF Studie)

    Get PDF

    Die interventionelle Behandlung der hochgradigen Mitral- und Trikuspidalklappeninsuffizienz durch das Edge-to-Edge-Verfahren mit dem MitraClip XTR vs. NTR System

    Get PDF
    Diese Doktorarbeit beschäftigt sich in drei Publikationen mit der Durchführbarkeit, den Risiken und Chancen der Behandlung der hochgradigen Mitral- und Trikuspidalklappeninsuffizienz mit dem MitraClip XTR vs. NTR System

    Outcome of adult patients with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: a retrospective analysis

    Get PDF

    Assistive Technologien in der Interaktion mit unvertrauten Menschen mit schwerer und mehrfacher Behinderung

    Get PDF

    Systematischer Review und Metaanalyse der in der PEDro Datenbank gelisteten randomisierten, kontrollierten Studien zur Lasertherapie am Stütz- und Bewegungsapparat

    Get PDF
    1) Laser therapy has been established over the last 40 years as a safe and effective conservative treatment method for various diseases of the musculoskeletal system. This is evidenced by, among other things, almost 10,000 publications that are currently found under the keyword “low level laser therapy” in PubMed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). However, this wealth of information makes it almost impossible to obtain a comprehensive overview of the current state of research on laser therapy in evidence-based medicine. In this context, the freely available Physiotherapy Evidence Database ("PEDro database") (www.pedro.org.au) established and maintained by the Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, School of Public Health at the University of Sydney (Sydney, Australia) is a useful and attractive alternative (in Germany this database would rather be called the “database of evidence-based conservative orthopedics”). With over 60,000 randomized, controlled studies, systematic reviews and clinical guidelines, PEDro represents a unique source of information for clinical practice. A systematic analysis of all studies on laser therapy for various diseases of the musculoskeletal system listed in the PEDro database is currently not available in the literature. 2) The aim of the present work was to test the following hypothesis: based on a systematic review and a meta-analysis of all studies listed in the PEDro database on laser therapy for diseases of the musculoskeletal system, a concrete guideline for laser therapy for these diseases can be derived. 3) For this purpose, the PEDro database was searched on March 23, 2021 using the search term “laser”. Of the 768 studies found, 200 reviews and 365 studies that were not relevant to the topic were excluded in a multi-stage process. The remaining 203 studies were indication-specific (plantar fasciopathy, Achilles tendinopathy, knee osteoarthritis, osteoarthritis of the hand, carpal tunnel syndrome, tennis elbow, subacromial impingement, tendinopathy of the supraspinatus tendon, non-specific lumbar back pain, non-specific shoulder pain, non-specific neck pain, tension-type headache, myofascial pain syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis and fibromyalgia) divided into 5 categories (Category 1: better results with the laser therapy than with the sham treatment or the control therapy; Category 2a: good results with both the laser therapy and with the sham treatment; Category 2b: good results with both the laser therapy and with the Control therapy; Category 3: good results neither with the laser therapy nor with the sham treatment or the control therapy; Category 4: good results only with the sham treatment or the control therapy, but not with the laser therapy). In addition, a total of 17 different parameters were read from each study, which could fundamentally have influenced the study results. Finally, it was checked for each study whether it was suitable for an indication-specific meta-analysis and whether the corresponding indication had been examined in at least three studies (this criterion was met for the indications knee osteoarthritis, carpal tunnel syndrome, tennis elbow, subacromial impingement, non-specific lumbar back pain, non-specific shoulder pain, myofascial pain syndrome and rheumatoid arthritis). The entire analysis was carried out according to the so-called “PRISMA” criteria (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Metaanalyses). 4) The systematic review represented >40 years of clinical research on laser therapy and showed that the vast majority of the studies examined could be assigned to categories 1 and 2b, meaning that laser therapy achieved a significant reduction in pain. The indication-specific meta-analyses represented 35 years of clinical research on laser therapy and showed a statistically significantly better effect of laser therapy than sham or non-treatment for all indications examined. However, a direct dependence of the 17 parameters examined on the results of the studies could not be proven for any of the indications examined. Therefore, the hypothesis formulated at the beginning had to be rejected. 5) In summary, the field of laser therapy is characterized by a seemingly absurd heterogeneity of the 17 parameters examined in the present study. It could not be conclusively assessed whether this extreme heterogeneity is due to the fact that 97 different laser therapy devices were used in the 203 studies examined. However, the fact that in over 30 of the studies examined not even the name and manufacturer of the laser therapy device used was mentioned (which de facto makes the corresponding studies not reproducible) indicates that there is a lot of catching up to do in this area. 6) Overall, it would be a great pity if based on the published studies laser therapy for various diseases of the musculoskeletal system were to fall into disrepute as a "trial and error" method, especially in the academic world, and not find the place in modern conservative orthopedics based on their potential demonstrated both in basic research and in many clinical studies

    22,444

    full texts

    22,455

    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    Digitale Hochschulschriften der LMU
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Open Research Online? Become a CORE Member to access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard! 👇