Agricultural Research Service - Southeast Area

USDA - ARS - NWISRL
Not a member yet
    1816 research outputs found

    Variation in ruminant preference for alfalfa hays cut at sunup and sundown

    Get PDF
    Diurnal variation in the concentration of total nonstructural carbohydrates (TNC) occurs in plants as a result of photosynthesis. Ruminants have been shown to prefer tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreber) hays cut in the afternoon but the effect of morning vs. evening cutting had not been tested in legumes. To test for diurnal variation in preference for alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), we harvested six times in the midbud stage. Harvests were paired so that each time a cutting of alfalfa was made at sundown (PM) another was made the next morning at sunup (AM). We harvested in this manner three times resulting in six hays. The hays were field dried, baled, and chopped prior to their use 3 to 6 mo after harvest. Three experiments were conducted [Exp. 1, sheep (Ovis aries); Exp. 2, goats (Capra hircus hircus); and Exp. 3, cattle (Bos taunts)] utilizing six animals in each case. During an adaptation phase, hays were offered alone as meals. In the experimental phase, every possible pair of hays (15 pairs) was presented for a meal. Data were analyzed by multidimensional scaling as well as by traditional analyses. Multidimensional scaling indicated that the animals were basing selection on at least two criteria. Variables associated with preference through multiple regression varied across experiments but significant coefficients were found between preference and nitrate, protein, carbohydrate fractions, lignin, and cellulose. Coefficients varied depending on which other variables were in the model; however, carbohydrates were associated with positive coefficients. Shifting hay mowing from early in the day to late in the day was effective in increasing forage preference as expressed by short-term dry matter intake

    Influence of adverse soil conditions on the formation and function of Arbuscular mycorrhizas

    Get PDF
    The majority of plants have mycorrhizal fungi associated with them. Mycorrhizal fungi are ecologically significant because they form relationships in and on the roots of a host plant in a symbiotic association. The host plant provides the fungus with soluble carbon sources, and the fungus provides the host plant with an increased capacity to absorb water and nutrients from the soil. Adverse conditions are a pervasive feature in both natural and agronomic soils. The soil environment is constantly changing with regard to moisture, temperature and nutrient availability. In addition, soil properties are often manipulated to improve crop yields. In many cases, soils may be contaminated through disposal of chemicals that are toxic to plants and microorganisms. The formation and function of mycorrhizal relationships are affected by edaphic conditions such as soil composition, moisture, temperature, pH, cation exchange capacity, and also by anthropogenic stressors including soil compaction, metals and pesticides. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi are of interest for their reported roles in alleviation of diverse soil-associated plant stressors, including those induced by metals and polychlorinated aliphatic and phenolic pollutants. Much mycorrhizal research has investigated the impact of extremes in water, temperature, pH and inorganic nutrient availability on mycorrhizal formation and nutrient acquisition. Evaluation of the efficacy of plant–mycorrhizal associations to remediate soils contaminated with toxic materials deserves increased attention. Before the full potential benefits of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to reclaim contaminated soils can be realized, research advances are needed to improve our understanding of the physiology of mycorrhizae subjected to adverse physical and chemical conditions. This paper will review literature and discuss the implications of soil contamination on formation and function of arbuscular mycorrhizal associations

    Irrigation: An historical perspective

    Get PDF
    Irrigation can be broadly defined as the practice of applying additional water (beyond what is available from rainfall) to soil to enable or enhance plant growth and yield, and, in some cases, the quality of foliage or harvested plant parts. The water source could be groundwater pumped to the surface, or surface water diverted from one position on the landscape to another. Development of irrigation water often entails development of large-scale, geographically significant dams and water impoundments and/or diversions that can provide additional functions apart from crop growth enhancement, e.g., flood control, recreation, or generation of electricity. In many cases sustainable irrigation development requires concomitant development of surface and/or subsurface drainage

    Aeration measurement

    Get PDF
    Soil oxygen enables aerobic respiration of plant roots and soil micro- and meso-flora and fauna. Its availability can be limited by soil wetness, compaction, discontinuous pores, or high respiration in moist soil due to elevated soil temperature or incorporation of fresh organic substrate. With oxygen depletion, soil redox potential shifts from oxidative to reducing conditions, hampering plant growth because of less efficient metabolic pathways and release into soil of toxic by-products of reduction chemistry or anaerobic respiration. Several texts are excellent sources for fundamental soil aeration concepts (1-3). Measurements of soil aeration fall into three categories: "capacity," volume of gas-filled void space; "Intensity," partial pressure or concentration of oxygen (or other gases) in the voids; and "transport rate," the rapidity at which oxygen can be supplied to a point in the soil. Measurement difficulty increases in the order capacity < intensity < rate, as do the value and insight of the measurements

    Evaluating WEPP predicted on-field furrow irrigation erosion

    Get PDF
    The Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) model has the ability to predict erosion from furrow-irrigated fields. A previous evaluation showed that WEPP-predicted infiltration and soil loss correlated poorly with field measurements. Our objective was to further evaluate the WEPP model for furrow irrigation by comparing on-field distribution of measured and predicted infiltration, runoff and soil loss. We used data from three fields with Portneuf silt loam (coarse-silty, mixed, superactive, mesic Durinodic Xeric Haplocalcids) near Kimberly, ID. Single-event WEPP simulations were used so predicted erosion could be evaluated without the effects of daily model adjustments to effective hydraulic conductivity, critical shear and rill erodibility. Single-event simulations showed that the model could only adequately predict infiltration and runoff within a field when effective hydraulic conductivity was calibrated for each irrigation. However even with accurate furrow flows, the WEPP model could not adequately predict sediment detachment, transport, and deposition within a field. Comparing measured and predicted on-field distribution of soil loss indicated that transport capacity was over-predicted by the model because deposition was only predicted when detachment was greatly over-predicted. More thorough investigation of the WEPP model programming and more detailed furrow erosion field data are needed to develop an accurate simulation model for furrow irrigation erosion

    Seasonal phosphate activity in three characteristic soils of the English uplands polluted by long-term atmospheric nitrogen deposition

    Get PDF
    Phosphomonoesterase activities were determined monthly during a seasonal cycle in three characteristic soil types of the English uplands that have been subject to long-term atmospheric nitrogen deposition. Activities (moll para-nitrophenol ri soil dry wt. h-1) ranged between 83.9 and 307 in a blanket peat (total carbon 318 mg g-1, pH 3.9), 45.2-86.4 in an acid organic grassland soil (total carbon 354 mg g-1, pH 3.7) and 10.4-21.1 in a calcareous grassland soil (total carbon 140 mg g-1, pH 7.3). These are amongst the highest reported soil phosphomonoesterase activities and confirm the strong biological phosphorus limitation in this environmen

    Biotransfer possibilities of selenium from plants used in phytoremediation

    Get PDF
    We are investigating the biotransfer of accumulated Se by the plant in several phytoremediation systems. In study I, we evaluated the biotransfer of Se from Indian mustard, a Brassica species, to the insect-cabbage looper (Trichoplusia ni); mortality, deterrence, and biomagnification of Se were examined. We determined that feeding behavior of food chain consumers was affected not only by the plant concentration of Se, but also by the mobility of the insects and choice of feed available. In study II, we examined the survival and development of beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua) fed Se-enriched plant tissues from different lines of saltbush (Atriplex spp.) After feeding on lines of saltbush that produced high biomass and accumulated high concentrations of Se, insect growth and survival was reduced. In studies III, IV, and V, lambs, dairy cows, and rabbits were fed Se-enriched Brassica and Medicago (alfalfa) plants as part of their feed ration. None of the tested animals exhibited any Se toxicity symptoms, but they had increased levels of Se in most tissues sampled (e.g., organs, blood, urine, feces), excluding milk. In study VI, we evaluated biotransfer of Se from broccoli to rats to determine efficacy of Se for reducing colon cancer. We found that Se-enriched plant material was more effective than inorganic sources of Se for preventing precancerous colon lesions. Results from all studies clearly show that Se absorbed by plants can be transferred biologically in an intentional or unintentional manner to insects and animals

    Management of irrigated agriculture to increase organic carbon storage in soils

    Get PDF
    Increasing the amount of C in soils may be one method to reduce the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere. We measured organic C stored in southern Idaho soils having long term cropping histories that supported native sagebrush vegetation (NSB), irrigated moldboard plowed crops (IMP), irrigated conservation-chisel-tilled crops (ICT), and irrigated pasture systems (IP). The CO2 emitted as a result of fertilizer production, farm operations, and CO 2 lost via dissolved carbonate in irrigation water, over a 30-yr period, was included. Net organic C in ecosystems decreased in the order IP > ICT > NSB > IMP. In this study, if NSB were converted to IMP, 0.15 g C m- 2 would be emitted to the atmosphere, but if converted to IP 3.56 g C m 2 could be sequestered. If IMP land were converted to ICT, 0.95 g C m 2 could be sequestered in soil and if converted to IP 3.71 g C m 2 could be sequestered. There are 2.6 x 108 ha of land worldwide presently irrigated. If irrigated agriculture were expanded 10% and the same amount of rainfed land were converted back to native grassland, an increase of 3.4 x 109 Mg C (5.9% of the total C emitted in the next 30 yr) could potentially be sequestered. The total projected release of CO2 is 5.7 X 10'" Mg C worldwide during the next 30 yr. Converting rainfed agriculture back to native vegetation while modestly increasing areas in irrigated agriculture could have a significant impact on CO2 atmospheric concentrations while maintaining or increasing food production

    Nutrient losses in surface irrigation runoff

    Get PDF
    Runoff from surface-irrigated fields is typically managed to improve infiltration uniformity by reducing differences in infiltration opportunity times between the upper and lower ends of fields. Runoff water not used on other fields within an irrigation tract is discharged to streams or rivers, along with sediment and nutrients. Return flow nutrient and sediment concentrations may be greater than in the diverted water, but the total sediment and nutrient mass returned may be less if most of the diverted water infiltrates within the irrigation tract. Controlling erosion reduces total phosphorus loss, because total phosphorus concentration relates directly to sediment concentration. On-farm management practices, such as polyacrylamide (PAM) application and conservation tillage, reduce erosion from fields, while sediment ponds in the field or on return-flow streams trap suspended sediment that is not controlled by on-farm practices. Surface irrigation return-flow water quality can be improved with an organized effort using a combination of practices

    Erosion, controlling irrigation-induced

    Get PDF
    Erosion is the greatest threat to agricultural sustainability. Most irrigation is on fragile arid soils that have enormous crop yield potential when irrigated. However, that yield potential is easily lost if the thin veneer of "topsoil" is eroded (1). Erosion prevention on irrigated land is, arguably, more important than on rainfed land. Yields from irrigated land are more than double those from non-irrigated land, with nearly triple the crop value per hectare (2). In addition, runoff and irrigation return flows (necessary in many surface irrigation schemes) deliver sediment; human, animal and plant pathogens; nutrients and pesticides to downstream fields and riparian waters. These pollutants accumulate in runoff primarily as a result of erosion

    1,724

    full texts

    1,816

    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    USDA - ARS - NWISRL
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Open Research Online? Become a CORE Member to access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard! 👇