Agricultural Research Service - Southeast Area

USDA - ARS - NWISRL
Not a member yet
    1816 research outputs found

    Water treatment residuals and biosolids long-term co-applications effects to semi-arid grassland soils and vegetation

    Get PDF
    Water treatment residuals (WTRs) and biosolids are byproducts from municipal water treatment processes. Both byproducts have been studied separately for land application benefits. There are possible environmental benefits of WTRs and biosolids co-application but these studies are limited. Our objectives were to determine relative long-term (13–15 yr) effects of a single and short-term (2–4 yr) effects of repeated WTR-biosolids co-applications on soil chemistry, microbiology, and plant community structure in a Colorado semiarid grassland. Only relative changes associated between co-applications were studied, as we assumed WTR application would only occur if used as a management practice. Three WTR rates (5, 10, and 21 Mg ha–1) were surface co-applied (no incorporation) with a single biosolids rate (10 Mg ha–1) once in 1991 (long-term plots) and again in 2002 (short-term plots). Soil 0- to 8-, 8- to 15-, and 15- to 30-cm depth pH, electrical conductivity (EC), NO3–N, NH4–N, total C, and total N were not aff ected by WTR application in 2004, 2005, or 2006. Ammonium-bicarbonate diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (AB-DTPA)- extractable soil Al was unaffected by WTR application, but extractable P and Mo decreased with increasing WTR rate because of WTR adsorption. Plant tissue P and Mo content decreased with specific plant species and years due to adsorption to WTR; no deficiency symptoms were observed. Plant community composition and cover were largely unaffected by WTR application. Soil microbial community structure was unaffected by WTR co-application rate (total ester-linked fatty acid methyl ester [EL-FAME] concentrations ranged from 33.4 to 54.8 nmol g–1 soil), although time since biosolids-WTR application affected a subset of microbial community fatty acids including markers for Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Overall, WTR-biosolids co-applications did not adversely affect semiarid grassland ecosystem dynamics

    Reducing sucrose loss in sugarbeet storage

    Get PDF
    Controlling sucrose loss in sugarbeet storage has been an industry goal since the 1950s. Sugarbeet roots utilize sucrose for energy to maintain themselves. Dessication from wind and sun or too much rain and microbial activity can negatively influence stored roots, increasing respiration and the buildup of impurities. Factors such as scalping, impacts and wounding during harvest and transport, mud and weeds in piles, and unusually high and low temperature can also lead to sucrose loss. Disease and drought stress during production can also predispose roots to sucrose loss in storage. In particular, rhizomania caused by Beet necrotic yellow vein virus has been shown to compromise the storability of roots allowing for significant sucrose losses in storage by early December. Sucrose losses over 90 percent have been documented in long-term storage (142 days) with cultivars that lack storability. Thus, developing a cultivar selection program for storage could be of considerable benefit to the sugarbeet industry

    Case Study: On-Farm Evaluation of Liquid Dairy Manure Application Methods to Reduce Ammonia Losses

    Get PDF
    The volatilization of NH3 from landapplied manure is not only a loss of valuable N, but also an air quality concern because NH3 plays a role in the formation of airborne particulate matter, which can be a health hazard. The relative differences in potential NH3 losses from land application of liquid dairy manure were determined via 3 methods: surface application, Aerway incorporation (shallow incorporation with a rolling tine aerator), and subsurface injection. Liquid manure was applied at a rate of 190 m3/ha on 4 farms with average N and P application rates ranging from 28 to 130 kg N/ha and 6 to 36 kg P/ha, respectively. Average NH3 concentrations were measured with passive samplers for 3 d after manure application and ranged from 0.03 to 0.21 mg NH3-N/m3. There were main effects of sampler height, day, and application method. The greatest NH3 concentrations occurred during the first 48 h after manure application. Concentrations of NH3 measured at 1 m (averaged over 48 h) indicated that surface and Aerway applications had the greatest concentrations (0.16 and 0.17 mg NH3-N/m3, respectively) whereas subsurface injection of manure resulted in a 67% decrease in NH3 concentration, which was similar to the control plots (0.06 and 0.04 mg NH3-N/m3, respectively). Subsurface injection was the best method of liquid manure application for minimizing NH3 losses

    High-yielding corn response to applied phosphorus, potassium, and sulfur in Nebraska

    Get PDF
    Nutrient management recommendations may change as yield levels and efficiency of crop production increase. Recommendations for P, K, and S were evaluated using results from 34 irrigated corn (Zea mays L.) trials conducted in diverse situations across Nebraska. The mean yield was 14.7 Mg ha–1 with adequate fertilizer applied. The median harvest index values were 0.52, 0.89, 0.15, and 0.56 for biomass, P, K, and S, respectively. Median grain yields were 372, 49, and 613 kg kg–1 of aboveground plant uptake of P, K, and S, respectively. The estimated critical Bray-1 P level for corn response to 20 kg P ha–1 was 20 mg kg–1 when the previous crop was corn compared with 10 mg kg–1 when corn followed soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Soil test K was generally high with only three site-years <125 mg kg–1. Over all trials, application of 40 kg K ha–1 resulted in a 0.2 Mg ha–1 mean grain yield decrease. Application of 22 kg S ha–1 did not result in significant yield increase in any trial. Soil test results accounted for twice as much variation in nutrient uptake when soil organic matter (SOM) and pH were considered in addition to the soil test nutrient values. The results indicate a need to revise the current recommendation for P, to maintain the current K and S recommendations, and to use SOM and pH in addition to soil test nutrient values in estimating applied nutrient requirements for irrigated high yield corn production

    PAM in irrigated agriculture: Processes and soil-PAM interactions influencing canal sealing

    Get PDF
    To identify or develop alternative polymers, which may successfully replace polyacrylamide (PAM) as a reservoir or canal sealant, it is important to understand the nature of the sealing processes in earthen irrigation water structures and how PAM interacts with those processes to alter water seepage. The purpose of this paper is to review mechanisms that influence water infiltration into unlined irrigation canals and ponds and consider how PAM interactions with soils may alter these processes

    Insecticide seed treatments for sugarbeet

    Get PDF
    Pest feeding and vectoring of viruses cause serious problems in sugarbeet production worldwide. In order to ameliorate pest and disease problems on sugarbeet, two seed treatments, Poncho Beta (60 g a.i. clothianidin + 8 g a.i. beta-cyfluthrin/100,000 seed) and Cruiser Tef (60 g a.i. thiamethoxam + 8 g a.i. tefluthrin/100,000 seed) were investigated (the neonicotinoid was tested alone in some trials). The two seed treatments and an untreated check were tested in a series of eight field trials from 2006 to 2008 along with various commercial sugarbeet cultivars in a randomized complete block design with eight replications per trial. Natural pest incidence and curly top symptoms were evaluated. Both Poncho Beta and Cruiser Tef provided significant reduction in curly top symptoms and incidence of spinach leafminer (Pegomya hyoscyami Panzer), black bean aphid (Aphis fabae Scopoli), and sugarbeet root aphid (Pemphigus betae Doane). At times Poncho Beta performed better than Cruiser Tef, but yield parameters for the two products were similar. When averaged over the trials, Poncho Beta improved yields over the untreated check by 3.3 t/A, a 9% increase. Neonicotinoid seed treatments will play an important role in disease and pest management in sugarbeet production, but should be viewed as a supplement to host resistance and not a substitute for it

    Evaluation of Beta corolliflora for resistance to curly top in Idaho

    Get PDF
    Curly top of sugarbeet is caused by Beet severe curly top virus (BSCTV) or closely related curtovirus species which are vectored by the beet leafhopper (Circulifer tenellus). Beta corolliflora, shown in 1969 to impart a very high level of curly top resistance to sugarbeet into the BC2 generation, is a wild relative of cultivated sugarbeet that has not been utilized in breeding programs. The nature of curly top resistance from B. corolliflora seems to be reduced symptoms and resistance to viral accumulation. Field screening of 14 B. corolliflora accessions for resistance to curly top followed by PCR detection of BSCTV did not identify any accessions with phenotypic symptoms of curly top and 9 accessions did not have detectable virus. Clip cage inoculations followed by PCR detection of BSCTV and of related species, Beet mild curly top and Beet curly top viruses, were difficult to interpret due to small sample size but indicated that accessions BETA 408, BETA 414, BETA 528, BETA 690, and BETA 805, from Genebank Gatersleben, Foundation Liebniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research, Gatersleben, Germany had no visible curly top symptoms or evidence of virus accumulation. Results of a preference test showed that beet leafhoppers did not have a strong aversion to B. corolliflora and likely would have at least sampled the plants in the field. Therefore, field screening for resistance to curly top, at least in the early generations of an introgression program, should be successful

    Impact of removing straw from wheat and barley fields: A literature review

    Get PDF
    The sustainability of straw removal from wheat and barley fields from the standpoint of its effects on soil properties and nutrient cycling is a concern. A recent literature review reveals that there is no negative effect of small grain straw removal on soil organic carbon (SOC) content with irrigated conditions. With rainfed conditions, the results could be more variable and depend on site productivity. Large amounts of nutrients are removed when straw is removed, accelerating the rate of nutrient depletion and cost of replacing these nutrients

    Clinoptilolite zeolite influence on inorganic nitrogen in silt loam and sandy agricultural soils

    Get PDF
    Development of best management practices can help improve inorganic nitrogen (N) availability to plants and reduce nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N) leaching in soils. This study was conducted to determined the influence of the zeolite mineral Clinoptilolite (CL) additions on NO3-N and ammonium-nitrogen (NH4-N) in the soil/leachate system of two common Pacific Northwest soils (Portneuf silt loam and Wolverine sand)

    Soil genesis and development, lesson 2: Weathering processes of rocks and minerals

    Get PDF
    Weathering of rocks and minerals, which include physical, chemical, and biological processes, contributes to the development of soil. The degree of weathering depends not only on the rock and mineral composition but also on climate and biological activities. Experiential learning activities for different global regions support the learning objectives. At the completion of this lesson, students will be able to do the following: 1. Describe how climatic factors influence the weathering of rocks and minerals. 2. Define and distinguish physical, chemical, and biological weathering processes. The lesson is written to target educational needs of lower-level undergraduate students in earth and environmental sciences and is available for use by the public and educational institutions

    1,724

    full texts

    1,816

    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    USDA - ARS - NWISRL
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Open Research Online? Become a CORE Member to access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard! 👇