8073 research outputs found
Sort by
Torino congiuntura, 2012. Trimestrale settembre 2012, Anno 13, n. 49. Analisi congiunturale aprile-giugno 2012
No full textStudi, statistica e documentazione. Torino congiuntura.Torino. STE
Rapporto 2010. La formazione professionale regionale in Piemonte (Anno 2009)
No full textContributi di ricerca ; n.241/201
OCSE-PISA 2009: i risultati del Piemonte a confronto con le altre regioni italiane e straniere
No full textQuaderni di ricerca Ires ; n.12
Alla ricerca della dimensione territoriale ottimale e omogenea. Il caso piemontese
No full textFocus Federalismo fiscale ;
Impatto della crisi sul sistema produttivo regionale
No full textSistema informativo delle attività produttiv
Patrimonio culturale materiale e immateriale: verso un modello integrato ipotesi progettuale per il distretto tecnologico dei beni culturali(PON 2007-2013)
No full textRT 038;The relationship between intangible culture and tangible cultural heritage is so close that it is impossible to separate. It includes monuments and sites, which constitute the primary objectives of the UNESCO activity, as well as historical centers and urban spaces, is so close that it is impossible to separate. The project proposal concerns knowledge of the cultural intangible heritage with in the site identified in a sample of those entered in the World Heritage List, in the Italian regions (Sicily, Puglia and Campania) included in Technological District of the Cultural Heritage, especially with reference to the historical urban spaces, included in the site or in its buffer zone
Politiche sui patrimoni culturali: uno sguardo indietro per fare il punto
No full textWP 08/2011; Even before the integration in a multinational entity, culture has been fundamental in the making of Europe, maintaining within itself a remarkable diversity. From 1986 onwards, the Framework Programmes have supported and financed more than 120 projects in the field of cultural heritage, linking about 500 public and private research organisations – universities, research centres, museums, firms – overall the Union and among its Mediterranean partners, aiming at developing and applying state-of-the-art technology and the best know how to our cultural heritage. During the same period, in Italy we can single out two great research areas in this sphere; they had a different origin and different objectives - the first one concerned high level professional training, the second one regarded applied research - but dealt indeed successfully with the same issues. The two were the Cultural Fields Programme (1989-1991) and the Finalised Project Cultural Heritage of the National Research Council (1996-2000), prepared by a Strategic Project with the same name, in the previous three-year period (1992-1995). At the international level, along with the above mentioned public interventions in Europe and Italy, on the 16 November 1972, during its 17th general Conference, the Organisation of United Nations for Education, Science and Culture, adopted the Convention for the Protection of the World Natural and Cultural Heritage, in order to build up a list of sites (historical centres, monuments, landscape areas) on the basis of which it could start protection and development actions for these places. Also during the 1980s and beyond, while the United Nations promoted the World Decade for Cultural Development (1988-1997) several experts’ groups dealt with these problems, originating an in-depth discussion whose results were embodied, in the following decade, in the Convention for the Protection of the Intangible Cultural Heritage in 2003
Asian tigers in nanotechnologies: evolutionary path of scientific production of People's Republic of China, Japan and South Korea
No full textWP 05/2011; Nanosciences and nanotechnologies (NST) are a developing scientifictechnological area in full expansion and evolution. Their character of General Purpose Technology has been assessed. Asian countries play a relevant role in the evolutionary path and growth of NST, as in some cases they present a rapid growth of scientific production. This work analyzes the performance of three of such countries – People’s Republic of China, Japan, South Korea – emphasizing several aspects of their performance in scientific production and putting in reciprocal relations these aspects. Results show a different behaviour of Japan – which starting from a dominant position is loosing ground with respect to its competitors – and of the other two countries which are catching up. Insights on the internal organization and on the mutual relations are also offered, together with a comparison of the relation with other important areas of NST scientific production
