DigitalCommons@C.O.D.

ESSAI
Volume 14 Article 4
Spring 2016
Acknowledgements
Follow this and additional works at: http://dc.cod.edu/essai
This Prefatory Note is brought to you for free and open access by the College Publications at DigitalCommons@COD. It has been accepted for
inclusion in ESSAI by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@COD. For more information, please contact koteles@cod.edu.
Recommended Citation
(2016) "Acknowledgements," ESSAI: Vol. 14 , Article 4.
Available at: http://dc.cod.edu/essai/vol14/iss1/4
III 
 
Acknowledgments 
 
 
 
We warmly salute all submitting instructors for their dedicated and inspired teaching 
which has contributed to the successful writing of their students and make it possible for 
ESSAI to continue. 
 
 
We also offer our special thanks to 
Dr. Ann Rondeau, President, 
Dr. Donna Stewart, Vice President Academic Affairs, 
Dr. Emmanuel Awuah, Associate Vice President Academic Affairs, 
 
 
Mr. Chuck Boone, Dean, Liberal Arts, 
Dr. Mark Collins, Associate Dean, English, 
Mr. Tom Cameron, Dean, Health and Sciences, 
Dr. Sandra Martins, Associate Dean, Humanities, 
For their constant, gracious support and encouragement. 
 
 
 
 
Our gratitude also goes to Karyin Boulom. 
Her meticulous and careful word processing expertise has been indispensable. 
 
 
 
 
Our special and heartfelt appreciation goes to Professor Blevins’ student, Mary Moses, 
who designed the book cover.  The others who submitted designs were Waqas Khalid, 
Christopher Minter, Kiya Morrison, and Luke Schilder. 
 
 
 
1
et al.: Acknowledgements
Published by DigitalCommons@COD, 2016


English

Acknowledgements

Loris, Dan

ESSAI
Volume 14 Article 25
Spring 2016
Ethno Nationalist Terror
Dan Loris
College of DuPage
Follow this and additional works at: http://dc.cod.edu/essai
This Selection is brought to you for free and open access by the College Publications at DigitalCommons@COD. It has been accepted for inclusion in
ESSAI by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@COD. For more information, please contact koteles@cod.edu.
Recommended Citation
Loris, Dan (2016) "Ethno Nationalist Terror," ESSAI: Vol. 14 , Article 25.
Available at: http://dc.cod.edu/essai/vol14/iss1/25
96 
Ethno Nationalist Terror 
 
by Dan Loris 
 
(History 2237) 
 
 
 
errorism has several variations and motivations, however, there are two main groups of ethno-
nationalist terrorism. The first group are the ones fighting to end their colonial status, and the 
second are the organizations that fight for independence within a larger state’s borders.1  The 
National Liberation Front (FLN) is a prime example of an organization fighting to end their colonial 
status from the French. On the other hand, the Irish Republic Army (IRA) would fall under both 
categories of ethno-nationalist terrorism, because of their revolution to end the colonial status of the 
British, and their fight for independence from the British Empire. This essay will address the very 
few differences between Irish National Terror and Algerian Terror, while examining how similar 
these two groups of terrorist’s motivations, general conditions, and responses are.  
Beginning in the mid-nineteenth century and continuing into the early twentieth century, 
there was a political divide between Ireland and England. There were staggering differences in how 
the Irish and English people were treated. At that time the English forced the Irish to convert to the 
Church of England, deprived them of economic gain, denied them social and political rights, and 
stole their land. Understandably, restricting religious practice and language was a major issue. 
England was considered an empire, and the Irish were seen as subjects rather than citizens in the eyes 
of the English empire. In most circumstances, when a country is taken over by an empire, they are 
brainwashed by their history and beliefs. It was in the 1850’s that political divisions were beginning 
to separate Northern and Southern Ireland. In the Northern part of Ireland was a segment of the 
population known as Unionists; their religious affiliation was Protestant and as such, they wanted to 
stay loyal to the Protestant British Empire.2  On the contrary, the southerners and northern Catholics 
of Ireland were known as Catholic Republicans, free of British Control.3  The south wanted to gain 
economic independence from the British Empire. According to Randall Law, “This created two 
overlapping conflicts: one between Irish republicans and the British, and one between Irish unionists 
and Irish republicans.”4  The aforementioned conflicts which arose because of this political divide 
were known as Whiteboy violence. By 1882, the Irish National Invincibles, a group of Fenians, 
assassinated the third-ranking British Official in Ireland, Thomas Burke. This event sparked the 
formation of the the London Metropolitan Police Service by British forces to defend against the 
Fenians.  
 By the time of the First World War (WW1), England became exhausted by the violence 
because it was hitting too close to home. The British had to decide what to do with the Irish; so in the 
late spring of 1914 they passed home rule. Home rule meant that England’s political control would 
be reduced in Ireland, but it would not make the Irish completely free of British control. However, 
because WW1 had just begun the British revoked this decision. In 1916, two years into the war, the 
Easter Uprising was led by the Fenian Empire. The Easter Uprising was one of the first acts of the  
 
  
1 Randall D. Law, Terrorism: A History (Cambridge: Polity, 2009), 178-179. 
2 Law, Terrorism, 142-143. 
3 Law, Terrorism, 142-143. 
4 Law, Terrorism, 143. 
T
1
Loris: Ethno Nationalist Terror
Published by DigitalCommons@COD, 2016
97 
terror movement in ethno-nationalist terrorism, and it occurred because the Fenians were afraid that 
home rule would destroy the Irish public’s interest in independence.5  The Fenian’s would later 
convert into what we know now as the Irish Republic Army (IRA). According to IRA member Liam 
Deasy, “In consequence of the events that occurred in the decisive week of the Easter Rising of 1916, 
and more particularly of the events that followed it, thousands of young men all over Ireland… 
turned irrevocably against the English government and became uncompromisingly dedicated to the 
cause of obliterating the last vestiges of British rule in Ireland.”6  This would come to be a double 
negative for the British, because they simultaneously had to fight in the largest military conflict in 
history at that time, as well as respond to attacks from the IRA within their own borders.  
 The IRA, consisting of about 15,000 total members, was led by Michael Collins. He 
understood that he and the IRA could not defeat the British in open battle; so guerilla warfare became 
an effective tactic for the IRA.7  However, Collins knew he would eventually need something more 
effective than guerrilla war tactics to achieve liberation; so he developed the following goal, “To 
paralyze the British machine it was necessary to strike at individuals. Without her spies England was 
helpless.”8  Collins had other motives to kill British police and criminal agents in the capital, and he 
wanted to disrupt the Irish government, as well. According to Richard English, “Then on 21 
November 1920 – the original Irish ‘Bloody Sunday’ – the IRA in Dublin struck at the British 
Intelligence network, killing over a dozen people and wounding six (some of these victims not, in 
fact, being intelligence agents.)”9  This original ‘Bloody Sunday’ incident would lead to many more 
acts of terror from the IRA in the 1960’s and 1970’s. After all, this turned into an ethnic colonial 
fight between Ireland and Britain. In 1921, after reciprocal accusations of terrorism, the British Prime 
Minister, David Lloyd George, thought it was pointless to continue fighting; a compromise was made 
so that the Southern part of Ireland would become a free state, however, the northern part of Ireland 
remained as a territory for the United Kingdom.  
 Similar to the ethno-nationalist terrorism taking place in Ireland and England, was a conflict 
between Algeria and France. In 1450, the Ottoman Empire, a Muslim Empire, invaded North Africa. 
The inhabitants of the northern cosmopolitan area in Algeria were religiously diverse. Centuries later, 
around 1710, Algerians began their fight for independence from the Ottoman Empire. When 
Napoleon ruled France, he wanted to conquer every country. However, by 1815 Napoleon’s reign 
was over after the battle of Waterloo, which led to the end of France’s domination in Europe. 
Algeria, however was still at war with almost every nation in Europe, along with many of the other 
Barbary States, which were states that supported piracy in northern Algeria. Then on July 5, 1830, 
the French invasion took place in a series of murderous campaigns.10  The French colonized the 
northern hemisphere of Algeria and created a cosmopolitan region. On the other hand, the south and 
middle parts of Algeria were very deserted and mainly populated by Muslims. 
 In 1848, the French moved into southern Algeria. As a result, a rebellion occurred. There 
were a number of problems that resulted from the French invasion of southern Algeria. The first 
problem was born from religious differences as the French were non-Muslim rulers. The French did  
 
  
5 Law, Terrorism, 144. 
6 Richard English, Armed Struggle: The History of the IRA (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), 4. 
7 Law, Terrorism, 145. 
8 Michael Collins, “Collapse of the Terror,” 3. 
9 English, Armed Struggle, 19. 
10 Michael Burleigh, Blood and Rage: A Cultural History of Terrorism (New York: Harper Collins, 
2009), 111. 
2
ESSAI, Vol. 14 [2016], Art. 25
http://dc.cod.edu/essai/vol14/iss1/25
98 
not believe in Sharia Law, which was problematic to the devout Muslims. The second problem came 
about from Algerian Muslims losing their land to the French, and the French sometimes gave that 
land away to other countries. The French taking away the Algerians land meant they were taking 
away their power. The third problem arose from traditional leaders being gone. The next problem 
resulted from the French educational system that was enforced. Algerian students were forced to 
learn French history. The French education system was the fastest way to brainwash the Algerians. 
The final problem was that a new social structure had developed. The French refused to liberate the 
Algerians in 1942, and by 1945 tensions came to a boiling point. At that time, the Arabs became so 
frustrated they killed 103 Europeans throughout a week of murderous rioting.11  Similar to the 
London Metropolitan Police Service protecting England from the IRA; the French, in 1947, installed 
the Mouvement pour le Triomphe des Libertes Democratiques (MTLD) as a form of voter 
suppression and arrest Muslim Nationalists. However, if the Algerians cooperated with French 
authorities, they were treated well. Similarly, the Northern Irish Unionists were given fair treatment 
on the condition of siding and conforming to British rule. It is important to note that the British did 
indeed discuss the prospect of giving the Irish citizenship; whereas the French never gave much 
consideration to granting citizenship to the Algerians. Why was this the case? The reason is likely 
because Algerians were brown skinned, whereas, the Irish were white skinned, and they lived close 
to the British. The Irish were seen as similar beings to the British while the Algerians were 
stereotyped as second class citizens or subjects. Racism was the major difference between Irish 
National Terror and Algerian terror.  
 After looking at many of the general conditions leading up to the National Liberation Front’s 
(FLN) establishment in 1954, there were a number of similarities to the IRA’s rise to power. Both 
groups of people were being colonized by dominant global powers. Algeria and Ireland were both 
stripped from their religion, language, as well as social and political rights. Considering both 
organizations’ main purpose was fighting for freedom begs the question, are the FLN and IRA 
terrorists or freedom fighters? It seems as if many of their motivations were related to gaining 
independence from a colonial status. The IRA killed several Irish citizens that supported the British 
in order to send a message of fear to the public. Correspondingly, the FLN focused on elaborating a 
network of institutions to refocus loyalties of the Arab and Berber people away from the colonial 
power, while still killing anyone working for the French administration.12  Also, both groups 
operated in very small assemblies, because they were overpowered by the larger armies that they 
were fighting against. Operating in these small assemblies allowed these groups to spread out and 
attack specific targets and strike fear amongst their enemies. Is there really a difference between 
these ethno-nationalist terrorist and the armies they are combatting? According to an FLN chief, “I 
see hardly any difference between the girl who places a bomb in the Milk-Bar and the French aviator 
who bombards a mechta or who drops napalm in a zone interdite.”13  It is not possible for either side 
to understand their own motives without, first, understanding their opponents.  
In conclusion, it is understood that there are two main types of ethno-nationalist terrorism. It 
can be inferred that Irish National Terror and Algerian Terror can be constituted under the 
classification of freedom fighters, because they see terrorism as the only war tactic that is successful 
for them to gain independence. Considering how impoverished Ireland and Algeria were during the 
nineteenth and twentieth centuries, small revolutionary attacks on important figures was the only way 
they could damage their opponents. Outside of extremism, many see terrorism as a step too far; they 
 
  
11 Burleigh, Blood and Rage, 112. 
12 Burleigh, Blood and Rage, 116. 
13 Burleigh, Blood and Rage, 122. 
3
Loris: Ethno Nationalist Terror
Published by DigitalCommons@COD, 2016
99 
want independence but they are not willing to commit acts of terror to gain autonomy. Then again, 
the empires that invaded these countries, and killed thousands of innocent civilians by stripping them 
of their land and liberty are not logically different from the so-called terrorists themselves. Terrorism 
is just a perspective; it is simply another tactic of war. The motives of these two different terrorist 
groups, Irish National terrorist and Algerian terrorist, were not all that different; however, the 
reactions of their opponents were. Racism is what prevented the French from considering the idea to 
liberate the Algerians. Whereas, the British saw the Irish somewhat equal to them because they 
looked similarly; so they considered to liberate them. The IRA and FLN wanted independence and to 
avoid religious persecution, and these organizations were willing to go to extreme measures to 
achieve their goals. In summary, many groups see the Algerians and the Irish nationalists as a model 
for how to take action, because these organizations were successful in their rebellion for 
independence. 
 
 
 
4
ESSAI, Vol. 14 [2016], Art. 25
http://dc.cod.edu/essai/vol14/iss1/25


Ethno Nationalist Terror

Warnecke, Elyse

Animation: A True Art

https://dc.cod.edu/marcom-studentlife-events/1985/thumbnail.jp

2013 Celebration of Academic Excellence_36

https://dc.cod.edu/marcom-studentlife-events/1983/thumbnail.jp

2013 Celebration of Academic Excellence_33

https://dc.cod.edu/marcom-studentlife-events/1681/thumbnail.jp

2012 Pathophysiology Panorama_04

https://dc.cod.edu/marcom-studentlife-events/1680/thumbnail.jp

2012 Pathophysiology Panorama_02

https://dc.cod.edu/marcom-studentlife-events/1666/thumbnail.jp

NSO Spring 2013_10

https://dc.cod.edu/marcom-studentlife-events/1661/thumbnail.jp

NSO Spring 2013_05

https://dc.cod.edu/marcom-studentlife-events/1652/thumbnail.jp

College of DuPage

Not a member yet