Constitutional Forum (Journal)
Not a member yet
    551 research outputs found

    CONSTITUTIONAL DIALOGUES BETWEEN COURTS AND LEGISLATURES: CAN WE TALK?

    No full text
    The topic we have been asked to address is Courts on Legislatures.1 This raises the issue about the nature of the relationship between courts and legislatures in a constitutional democracy (and for my purposes, I treat the executive and legislative branches as one). The relationship between courts and legislatures is complex and challenging. However, it need not be controversial and conflicted as long as each understands and respects the institutional role played by the other – and the dividing line between them

    REPRESENTATION BY TERRITORY: A PROPOSAL FOR SENATE REFORM

    No full text
    REPRESENTATION BY TERRITORY: A PROPOSAL FOR SENATE REFOR

    THE NATURE OF EQUALITY: APPLES AND ORANGES / CHESTS AND BREASTS

    No full text
    The nature of equality: apples and oranges / chests and breast

    Upper House Reform in Germany: the Commission for the Modernization of the Federal System

    No full text
    As the debate on a possible new second leg- islative chamber proceeds both in the United Kingdom (U.K.) and Canada, it is useful to note recent amendments to the German Con- stitution (Basic Law) affecting the federal up- per house of Parliament (Bundesrat). Despite all the differences among the House of Lords, the Canadian Senate,1 and the Bundesrat, there are some points on which a comparison is use- ful. Moreover, some of the impetus behind the German reforms — a conviction that there had been too much emphasis on cooperative feder- alism and too little on healthy competition — is reminiscent of debates about such matters in other federations in general, and Canada in particular

    Charter Rights and Public Policy Choices: The Supreme Court and Public Finance

    No full text
    Over the past two decades there have been numerous highly charged court cases involving claims that government program offerings and public spending fail to satisfy guarantees entrenched in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.1 Calls for enhanced appeal mechanism in refugee determination,2 provincial health care coverage of hospital translation services for the deaf,3 equal leave provisions4 for both adoptive and birth parents, government coverage of autism treatment regimes,5 and access to health care provision rather than access to a waiting list6 all illustrate the intersection of the Charter with the allocation of the public purse

    THE POST-CRITICAL FUTURE OF LEGAL THEORY

    No full text
    THE POST-CRITICAL FUTURE OF LEGAL THEOR

    A REVIEW OF THE TAYLOR CASE: USING HUMAN RIGHTS LEGISLATION TO CURB RACIST SPEECH

    No full text
    A REVIEW OF THE TAYLOR CASE: USING HUMAN RIGHTS LEGISLATION TO CURB RACIST SPEEC

    COMMENTS: NOW WHAT?

    No full text
    COMMENTS: NOW WHAT

    THE SUPREME COURT ENTRENCHES PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE OUT OF THE CHARTER\u27S REACH: DONOHOE V. CBC

    No full text
    THE SUPREME COURT ENTRENCHES PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE OUT OF THE CHARTER\u27S REACH: DONOHOE V. CB

    TERMINAL CARE, TERMINAL JUSTICE: THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA AND SUE RODRIGUEZ

    No full text
    TERMINAL CARE, TERMINAL JUSTICE: THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA AND SUE RODRIGUE

    0

    full texts

    551

    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    Constitutional Forum (Journal)
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Open Research Online? Become a CORE Member to access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard! 👇