Legal Scholarship Repository (University of Tennessee College of Law)
Not a member yet
    4884 research outputs found

    Mr. Micah Brunet’s Comments on Professor Weldon’s Presentation

    No full text

    Teaching the Choice Between Vagueness and Precision in Contracts

    No full text

    The Pitch: Teaching Client Impact, Board Governance, and Advocacy

    No full text

    Balancing Predictability with Flexibility in Contract Negotiation and Drafting

    No full text

    Supreme Court Preview: Key Health Law Issues for the 2024 Term

    No full text
    “Supreme Court Preview: Key Health Law Issues for the 2024 Term,” which included contributions from six different health law scholars across the country and was guest-edited by two others

    Contents

    No full text

    Burglary at Wal-Mart: Innovative Prosecutions of Banned Shoplifters under Tennessee Code Annotated Section 39-14-402

    No full text

    Issues in Tennessee Agricultural Law & Policy

    No full text

    Front Matter

    No full text

    Liability For The Lobbyist: How Corporate Oversight Can Quell Dissident Lobbying Efforts In The Realm Of Climate Change

    No full text
    Climate change continues to present mounting physical, transitional, and litigation risks for the private sector. Recognizing this threat, shareholders are increasingly pushing for corporate fiduciaries to embrace the transition to net-zero emissions by reallocating and transforming existing assets and operations. While some companies are aligning their corporate behavior with a pro-regulatory framework, others are engaging in efforts to promote disinformation, elevate anti-regulatory politicians, and thwart transitional legislation through the use of direct lobbying and trade association involvement. Such lobbying could result in greater transitional and litigation-based risks for the company. This Article attempts to map a practical approach for shareholders wishing to hold corporate fiduciaries accountable for lobbying inconsistently with shareholder expectations. By relying on data indicating an increase in public and shareholder sentiment toward aligning with the transition, as well as by analyzing recent developments in both SEC regulation over climate disclosures and the expansion of Delaware oversight law, this Article addresses the feasibility of pursuing Caremark oversight claims via derivative shareholder litigation

    0

    full texts

    4,884

    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    Legal Scholarship Repository (University of Tennessee College of Law)
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Open Research Online? Become a CORE Member to access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard! 👇