BUE Scholar (The British University in Egypt)
Not a member yet
4435 research outputs found
Sort by
Blue Carbon for Blue Nations: Ecosystem-Based Adaptation for SIDS under the Global Goal on Adaptation - Lessons from Belize
No full textMeasuring what matters: Designing Metrics for a Justice-centered climate transition
No full textClimate justice is growing concerns in the sphere of climate policy, yet few practical tools exist to measure whether climate action is fair, inclusive and prioritizing the most vulnerable. This paper examines existing global frameworks, such as the Environmental Performance Index (EPI), Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), and emerging tools like PRISM and JUSTICE Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs). While these initiatives offer valuable insights, most of them lack actionable and efficient metrics to quantify climate justice implementation. Based on literature and case studies, this study proposes a set of measurable indicators across four defined justice dimensions: Distributive, Procedural, Recognitional and Exposure. These metrics are designed to be incorporated into Next-Generation NDCs , to track both environmental and equity impacts of climate actions. By adopting such metrics, climate negotiations can move further from symbolic commitments, towards a transparent and justice-centered process
Open-Source Hardware for Renewable Energy Workforce Development
No full textThe renewable energy markets are undergoing significant developments; there is a considerable gap between the industry requirements and the available skillful workforce. According to the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA, 2024), the renewable energy industry globally employed 16.2 million people in 2023, with estimates showing a significant increase to around 40 million by 2050, depending on the achievement of a 1.5°C scenario. Though the continuous expansion of the workforce continues, there is still a shortage that will be difficult to fill. This shortage is a serious problem, especially in developing countries, where climate change is prompting the establishment of new job opportunities. Cost-effective and easily fabricated open-source hardware (OSH)-based systems are available and open for educational uses in solar, wind, and microgrid technologies, providing an attractive solution to this worldwide shortage of labor.
According to practical research, open-source hardware platforms could cut hardware acquisition and development costs down to 90% compared with proprietary hardware (Pearce, 2012; Open-Source Hardware Association, 2023). While the actual amount of such savings could vary with the specific application, the spillover remains significant. Open-source hardware kits are even being tried out in educational institutions around the globe and incorporated into community-oriented training programs with successful effects.
This literature review discusses how Open-Source Hardware (OSH) assists in achieving the goals of Action for Climate Empowerment (ACE) under COP30. Making a direct link with Axis V (Education for Green Jobs) and Axis VI (Technology Cooperation). There are three case studies reviewed: Solar Mamas (Barefoot College), Husk Power Systems, and microgrid training kits from HardwareX. The report ends with a set of policy recommendations to integrate OSH with climate education programs
Codifying Ecocide and Dismantling Corporate Impunity: Legal Pathways to Climate Justice at COP30
No full textThe accelerating climate crisis has transformed legal accountability into a central concern for global climate governance. This paper explores two negotiation-relevant challenges for COP30: (1) the codification of ecocide under international law, and (2) the dismantling of Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) mechanisms that shield transnational corporations from liability for environmental and human rights violations. Drawing from current legal developments, such as the 2021 proposed ecocide definition, and using cases from Brazil, Colombia, and the Netherlands, the paper argues that climate justice cannot be achieved without legal reform that targets systemic impunity. The focus of this paper evaluate the impact of ISDS on climate action by corporate entities regarding climate inaction and avoidance of responsibility. Some of the recommendations put forward include reforming the Rome Statute in order to codify ecocide, excluding the ISDS mechanism in environmental cases, and calling for the establishment of the Global Climate Justice Tribunal under CCOP30. Finally, the brief advocates for the incorporation of justice metrics into the Global Ethical Stocktake (GES), to incorporate matters of fairness into climate action. This paper seeks to assist the delegations aimed at the climate legal framework, so that the trust in climate protection with fundamental human rights compliance for the climate regime stays intact
Conflict Emissions and Environmental Destruction: Exacerbating Insecurity and Exclusion Among Vulnerable and Indigenous Communities in the Absence of Inclusive Climate Governance
No full textThis policy paper highlights that Indigenous and marginalized communities who manage an estimated 80 % of world biodiversity have access to less than 1 % of climate funding and are sidelined in national level decision-making (Rights and Resources Initiative, 2021). At the same time, armed conflict contributes an estimated 5.5 % of global CO₂-equivalent emissions that affects Indigenous peoples in fragile rural areas. (IPCC, 2022). Unlike failure of REDD +program in the Amazon region of Colombia, which excluded Indigenous governance and permitted deforestation to increase exponentially, DRC has developed community forest concessions integrating Indigenous and community management into climate governance (FAO, 2024).The two interventions suggested in this paper to be mainly implemented by decision-makers in particular, the national ministers of justice, environment, and Indigenous affairs, the COP30 negotiators; and multilateral funders (e.g. GCF, FCPF, CAFI), are as follows (1) Climate Justice Courts that will be able to acknowledge ecocide and conflict emissions, ensures Indigenous legal standing, establish FPIC and tenure security, and at least 25% of chairs of oversight committees to be filled by Indigenous/community representatives; (2) Indigenous women in conflict zones led Gender-Responsive Climate Justice Hubs, managing adaptation grants, co-developing local climate tools, and conducting annual gender-equity audits. Such reforms bring legal requirements, technology, and finance into alignment to inscribe Indigenous agency into climate governance— ensuring climate justice and ecological accountability for conflict emissions
Democratic Reliance on Non-State Actors for Climate Change: How Promotion of Subnational and Non-State Actors Mend the Gap to National Mitigation Outcomes.
No full textRepresentative democracies face structural and political challenges that hinder the implementation of robust climate action. Short electoral cycles discourage long-term investments in mitigation, while institutional inertia and political polarization stall responsive policymaking. Interest group influence further weakens reform efforts. These limitations are compounded by the public\u27s tendency to prioritize immediate, tangible benefits over long-term environmental gains, as illustrated by voter resistance to proactive climate taxation in Norway and Germany’s sluggish implementation of Paris Agreement targets. National climate strategies must therefore be reinforced by subnational and non-state actors. Cities, in particular, can serve as engines of innovation and implementation, leveraging localized attachment and efficacy to drive progress. Financially empowering municipalities and integrating climate policy at the local level can bridge national implementation gaps. Moreover, private actors and NGOs, often more nimble and less constrained, can influence policy, shape public discourse, and facilitate person-to-person engagement in international climate forums. Democracies, originally designed to slow rapid change, must now find ways to accelerate collective climate action. By distributing responsibility and creating vertical integration between cities and non-governmental organizations, democracies can better meet their climate goals and contribute meaningfully to global mitigation targets
THE SALTPOND OILFIELD’S SECOND LIFE: GHANA’S BIOENERGY WITH CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE (BECCS) OPPORTUNITY
No full textAs the achievement of net-zero emissions requires the unavoidable deployment of Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) technologies, this paper presents a technical and policy case for Ghana to implement Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) through the repurposing of the decommissioned Saltpond offshore oilfield for permanent CO2 sequestration. The proposal addresses two of Ghana’s developmental challenges in a single intervention: the conversion of millions of tonnes of agricultural and forestry residues into a sustainable feedstock solves a national waste management issue, while the resultant bioenergy generation supports rural electrification. This approach offers a more cost-effective CDR pathway than direct air capture (which is energy-intensive) and avoids the land-use competition of afforestation. The proposal also aligns with Ghana’s Nationally Determined Contribution, with implementation designed to draw from international climate finance under Article 6 and the new goals set at COP29. It therefore provides a scalable model for Ghana to meet its climate targets while enhancing national energy security and serves as a replicable strategy for other developing economies with similar bio geological assets
Moving Toward Net Zero: Transforming Global Transport with Clean Technologies
No full textThe transportation sector is one of the main and indispensable causes of greenhouse gas emissions, accounting for 23% of them. It is one of the fastest-growing sectors, and action must be taken quickly [1]. In this paper, we will discuss the current challenges in this sector and propose some solutions to reduce emissions in the context of sustainable development and climate action. First, we will discuss the reliance on biofuels, particularly successful policies in the European Union and Brazil. Second, we will discuss the use of renewable energy and EU legislation. Finally, this paper will present a core recommendation: using AI to reduce emissions is an effective and relatively low-cost solution, mentioning some available systems, most notably NASA\u27s SARDA
Bridging The Mitigation Gaps : Technology And Climate Finance In An Equitable Global Transition
No full textMitigation has been the scope of all international climate negotiations ; nevertheless, COP30 Agenda highlights the urgency in scaling up the ambition in reducing CO2 emissions , shifting towards renewable energy sources, mitigating for the 1.5°C and the Net-Zero target. This Policy Paper aim is bridging the gaps between The Global North (Developed) countries and The Global South (Developing) countries by exploring the main challenges that face both developed and developing countries when mitigating , using London and Egypt as prime examples, respectively; nevertheless, it proposes solutions for both countries in terms of the key pillars for the implementation techniques ; Climate Finance and Technology. This paper suggests that all countries and individuals should exchange data and technologies ; including, grant-based JETPs , Capacity-buildings for fossil fuels’ employees , integrating different renewable technologies and AI together , all in the aim of enhancing previous NDCs , GST , forming an alliance to develop a just transition robust plans in mitigation , adaptation , and implementation, as the interrelation between these three key pillars can save the environment from climate change ; in addition to , it aligns with the Brazil (mutirao) collective climate implementation and empowers the climate framework
Integrating Innovation Hubs into ACE Implementation: A Policy Framework for Community-Led Climate Capacity
No full textInnovation hubs and climate entrepreneurship platforms are expanding across the Global South, yet they remain largely disconnected from national Action for Climate Empowerment (ACE) strategies. Existing frameworks for climate education, public participation, and community engagement often overlook these hubs, missing opportunities to leverage their infrastructure for capacity building. Egypt’s CREATIVA Innovation Hubs, along with Kenya’s Climate Innovation Centre and the UNFCCC’s Global Innovation Hub, offer digital training, entrepreneurship support, and incubation for youth-led initiatives. However, they are not systematically integrated into climate education or adaptation programming. This paper calls on the Government of Egypt, in partnership with the Ministry of Communications and Information Technology (MCIT), the National Council for Climate Change (NCCC), the Ministry of Environment, and private sector actors, to embed innovation hubs into ACE delivery. A proposed model outlines four key actions: Align innovation ecosystems with youth empowerment pipelines. Establish inter-ministerial coordination between environment, education, and ICT authorities. Integrate adaptive learning systems for continuous monitoring. Promote long-term local ownership. The strategy begins with pilots in Cairo, Giza, Alexandria, Port Said, and Aswan, coordinated through a proposed Climate Innovation Sub-Committee within the National Green Taskforce. By linking innovation infrastructure to ACE, governments can transform hubs into platforms for community engagement, entrepreneurship, and climate resilience — strengthening local adaptive capacity and creating clear pathways for youth to contribute to national climate goals