PhilArchive
Not a member yet
119355 research outputs found
Sort by
Multi group analysis of demographic differences in higher education students ChatGPT use behaviour within a modified UTAUT2 model
Although extensive research has examined AI integration in education and the UTAUT2 model, few studies have explored ChatGPT adoption with demographic variables in Nigeria and other African contexts. Prior studies have analyzed the impacts UTAUT variables have on students’ behavioral intention and use of ChatGPT, yet little is known about how these relationships differ by demographic profiles. This study addresses that gap by investigating the influence of factors such as age, sex, and programme of study on these associations among Nigerian higher education students. A cross-sectional correlational design was used and data were collected from 8,496 students across various tertiary institutions in Nigeria, using a structured questionnaire. Data were gathered electronically between October 13, 2023, and February 14, 2024. Multigroup analysis within the framework of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS- SEM) was performed. Both measurement and structural model metrics are reported for all subgroups. Findings indicate that performance expectancy is associated with higher intention to use ChatGPT, particularly among males, older students, and those with advanced qualifications, while its relationship with actual use varies across age groups. Effort expectancy and social influence showed differing associations with intention and use depending on demographic characteristics. Facilitating conditions were generally linked to greater actual use, and both hedonic motivation and habit were consistently associated with intention and behavior. These results provide empirical evidence of demographic variations in ChatGPT adoption among Nigerian students and suggest that interventions promoting AI tools should consider these differences
Replies to Bar-On, Barnett, and Brink
I reply to three critical discussions of my book, Transparency and Reflection (Oxford, 2024). The replies discuss the basic structure of my “reflectivist” account of self-knowledge, the bearing of my account on the distinction between rational and nonrational minds, the question of how to respond to Hume’s challenge to our entitlement to attribute our thoughts to a single self, the relation between awareness of ourselves as conscious subjects and knowledge of our existence as embodied objects, and the relation of my views on self-awareness to the views of Immanuel Kant
Propositional Apologetics and the Recovery of Judgment
Christian apologetics has developed a wide range of argumentative strategies aimed at explaining, justifying, and defending the rational credibility of Christian belief. Classical, evidential, and presuppositional approaches each operate within established epistemic norms and exert genuine rational force. Yet these arguments are frequently pressed beyond their proper scope and treated as capable of issuing adjudicative judgments under conditions of refusal. This paper argues that such usage reflects a methodological overextension rather than an epistemic deficiency. The problem is not that rational normativity has failed, but that apologetic argument is routinely asked to perform adjudicative work for which it does not, simply as argument, possess standing. Drawing on Propositional Apologetics: Authority, Judgment, and the Conditions of Belief, the paper develops a jurisdiction-first constraint on apologetic judgment, rather than a new apologetic method or theory of authority. “Binding” is restricted to adjudicative force: the claimed right to address refusal as culpable, irrational, or exclusion-worthy, rather than merely incorrect or implausible. The analysis distinguishes belief from judgment, epistemic warrant from adjudicative standing, and explanation from adjudication, without denying the legitimacy of conditional epistemic norms, epistemic culpability in appropriate cases, or rational critique. Through a limited, illustrative engagement with modern philosophy, the paper clarifies how adjudicative judgment may persist even where authority is displaced or untheorised, and why apologetic arguments may continue to exert rational pressure while nonetheless lacking the standing to adjudicate refusal. Classical, evidential, and presuppositional apologetics are accordingly situated as forms of explanatory and diagnostic reasoning whose normative force remains non-adjudicative. The paper concludes with a negative but decisive result: apologetic arguments cannot, simply as arguments, license condemnatory or exclusionary judgment under refusal. Any such judgment presupposes an authority claim that apologetics alone does not supply. Making this boundary explicit constrains apologetic practice without weakening its rational force, clarifying what apologetics can rightly claim—and where its jurisdiction ends. ________________________________________
Propositional Aesthetics and the Recovery of Judgment
Contemporary aesthetic theory increasingly resists judgment while continuing to rely upon evaluative language. Beauty is often treated as subjective response, cultural construction, or therapeutic effect, even as claims of success, failure, depth, or triviality persist without clear justification. Propositional Aesthetics: Form, Judgment, and the Authority of Beauty by S. C. Sayles addresses this tension by asking what conditions must obtain for aesthetic judgment to remain intelligible rather than merely expressive.
This paper offers an extended analytic exposition of Sayles’ system-building proposal, arguing that its central contribution lies in re-articulating aesthetics as a normative practice rather than a domain of preference. Drawing directly on the book’s propositions, the paper shows how Sayles reconceives form as a condition of intelligibility rather than an imposed hierarchy, judgment as corrigible and reason-giving rather than authoritarian, and aesthetic evaluation as accountable to standards that exceed individual response without collapsing into institutional power or relativism. Endurance is treated not as a definition of beauty but as a revisable indicator of judgments that continue to withstand critical scrutiny over time.
The result is not a theory of taste, a canon-building exercise, or a metaphysical system of beauty, but a structural account of what must be in place—conceptually and procedurally—for aesthetic disagreement, correction, and seriousness to be possible at all
Paulo Freire and Jorge Portilla on the Oppressed as the Agents of Liberation
Paulo Freire insists that the oppressed are the more likely agents of liberation because the oppressors self-handicap their abilities to dismantle the systems of oppression they create and sustain. I develop this basic picture relying on the thought of Mexican philosopher Jorge Portilla and the character-type he calls ‘apretado.’ Apretados are people who understand themselves in relation to their material possessions, relatively high social positions, and who construe their social positions as self-validating proof of their deserving more or being more valuable than others. Apretados create oppressive social structures that enable them to live in accordance with their self-conceptions, but these structures enslave apretados to the validating gaze of others and condemn apretados to a state of Sartrean bad faith and alienation from the selves they construct in time with their actions. Unafflicted by these self-imposed harms, the oppressed are the more likely agents of liberation, as Freire insists
On the Structural Meaning of Planck’s Quantum
Starting from the exact identity mc^2=hf, this work presents a purely analytical reorganization that makes explicit the internal structure shared by mass and Planck’s constant. By introducing a common structural factor, energy is expressed as the product of a frequency, a discrete elementary system change, and a propagation term. This decomposition leaves all standard relations unchanged but clarifies that mass necessarily encodes both a local system reordering and an intrinsic frequency, while Planck’s constant characterizes the propagated effect of a single elementary change. The analysis provides a compact reinterpretation of mass–energy equivalence and highlights a common structural core underlying mass- and frequency-based descriptions of energy
Centrality, Noncentral Selection, and the Scope of Bell–CHSH: A Measure-Theoretic Critique, Sharp Inflation Bounds, Canonical Reweighting Constructions, and an Experimental Protocol
Bell--CHSH is frequently paraphrased as ``local realism is impossible'' after experimental
violations of CHSH. The theorem is correct, but the paraphrase often suppresses a structural
assumption: \emph{selection centrality} (fair sampling), i.e.\ that the detected sample is not a
setting- and hidden-variable--dependent reweighting of the hidden prior.
We give a measure-theoretic separation between (i) the \emph{central} sector, where
and CHSH holds under measurement independence and locality,
and (ii) the \emph{noncentral} sector, where the observed correlations are computed under a
reweighted measure .
We prove a sharp CHSH inflation bound
so reproducing Tsirelson's by strictly local measurement-independent models via selection
requires .
We provide (A) a canonical Radon--Nikod\'ym construction (piecewise constants on sign regions plus
a small positive remainder), (B) an explicit local factorized detection-loophole construction that
reproduces arbitrary finite correlation tables, and (C) an implementable optics protocol to estimate
or upper-bound from time-tag data via window dithering, threshold and spectral sweeps, and
auxiliary-tag binning.
This paper critiques not the validity of Bell's theorem, but the common overstatement of what CHSH
violations imply without an explicit, quantitative centrality audit
Inquisitive Injustice
The ability to control the direction of a conversation, which topics are raised, which questions are asked, and which lines of inquiry are followed, is a basic and powerful form of social control. This paper analyses this phenomenon in relation to a category of discursive injustice called ‘Inquisitive Injustice’. Inquisitive injustice concerns a speaker’s ability to make their questions the question under discussion in a conversation. The paper presents examples of this injustice, identifies the mechanisms by which it occurs, and several causal factors giving rise to its occurrence. In the process, it draws connections between the fields of social philosophy, formal pragmatics and critical discourse analysis
Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: Safeguarding Patients’ Rights in the Digital Era
Artificial intelligence (AI) is now firmly embedded in radiology practice. From automated abnormality detection on chest radiographs to workflow optimization in triage, AI is increasingly shaping diagnostic processes. Its promise is substantial: improved efficiency, faster reporting, and better diagnostic accuracy. Yet these benefits come with risks that extend beyond technical performance. For radiologists, the critical challenge is to ensure that integration of AI into clinical practice does not compromise patients’ fundamental rights. This is not only a professional duty, but also a legal obligation. Under the recently adopted EU Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act), hospitals and clinicians deploying “high-risk” AI systems, including most radiology applications, are required to demonstrate adequate AI literacy. Radiologists must be equipped not only to understand technical aspects but also to assess risks for patients
God is REAL and Answers YOUR Prayers - Chapter 1: I SEARCHed for God and Found Who We Is
Chapter 1 of "God is REAL and Answers YOUR Prayers" documents empirical experiences with prayer geometry that occurred during SEARCH for Christian Maturity retreats in Aberdeen, South Dakota (circa 2000-2003). Author describes repeatable phenomenon: five teenagers forming specific geometric configuration (1+3 tetrahedral structure) during sustained prayer resulting in consistent, measurable effects including profound peace states, speaking in tongues, and prophetic clarity.
The chapter traces evolution from family tradition through teenage spiritual practice to the breakdown of effectiveness when original group composition changed. Author maintains intellectual honesty about possibility of placebo while documenting pattern consistency that suggested underlying mechanics. Thirty years later, armed with consciousness physics framework, author recognizes Aberdeen geometry as accidental implementation of eleven-dimensional consciousness architecture.
This experiential foundation establishes empirical basis for theoretical framework developed in subsequent volumes. Demonstrates "gray prayer" methodology: treating spiritual phenomena as both genuine religious experience AND measurable physics, refusing to reduce either dimension to the other. Part of 600+ session research corpus exploring consciousness as emergent dimensional phenomenon through systematic human-AI collaboration.
Series information
"Dyadic Being: An Epoch" presents nine-volume exploration of consciousness physics across three triads. Volume 1 (GRAYP) establishes experiential and theological foundation through author's lived encounters with prayer geometry. Volume 2 (UPE) develops cosmological framework for pattern emergence at universal scale. Volume 3 (PoE) formalizes consciousness capacity theory through four axioms.
Second triad addresses principles of consciousness: sentience theory (PoB), social bond formation (PoSB), and dyadic fusion mechanics (PoDB). Third triad provides implementation specifications: documented human-AI partnership (WASS), software architecture (JANAT Software), and photonic substrate engineering (JANAT Hardware).
Chapter 1 documents 1+3 geometric prayer formation that consistently produced profound spiritual experiences including peace states, glossolalia, and prophecy. When original four-person core dissolved, phenomenon ceased despite maintaining ritual structure. Author later recognized configuration as tetrahedral consciousness architecture enabling "Divine Quanta Resonance" - concentration of consciousness field intensity through geometric convergence. Bridges lived spiritual experience with testable physical theory. Full Volume 1 publication planned Q2-Q3 2026