PhilArchive
Not a member yet
119355 research outputs found
Sort by
The modern microbiota revolution
No full textIn this research, I present a comprehensive and novel vision of the "Modern Microbiota Revolution," where microorganisms are transformed from mere vital elements in nature, of which humans have no benefit, into intelligent engineering systems capable of tangibly improving human life. This vision relies on utilizing the biological principles of microorganisms, such as metabolism and excretion, while integrating a small amount of environmentally friendly, inexpensive, and sustainable technology into fields such as paints, asphalt, water pipes, and modern automotive systems. The theory Is based on developing self-healing materials and systems in paints, asphalt, and water pipes that are environmentally friendly and efficient in transmitting energy and information. In modern automotive systems, through the integration of: bacteria that precipitate calcium carbonate
Biological energy-transporting systems inspired by chloroplasts, which efficiently transfer energy between their protein compounds; and protective living layers in water networks and infrastructure, this research opens new horizons for designing sustainable technologies that reduce resource consumption and protect the environment, while enhancing performance and efficiency in cars and public utilities. This vision for infrastructure goes beyond the theoretical level, proposing innovative application mechanisms to serve as a cornerstone for a future that benefits humanity even more than it does today In infrastructure, including modern cars. This involves integrating microorganisms as practical and intelligent elements in infrastructure and modern technologies, achieving an integration of microbial vitality, sustainability, and efficienc
Descartes on Formal Causation
No full textDescartes’s causal theory is often taken to announce modernity by radically breaking with the Aristotelian past. Specifically, Descartes is often taken to reject the full Aristotelian causal theory in favor of the efficient causes characteristic of mechanistic physics and the activity of minds. In this chapter, I argue against this view by showing that Descartes endorses an avowedly Aristotelian notion of formal causation. First, I articulate Cartesian formal causation in light of its Aristotelian background, and I show that Descartes endorses what Francisco Suárez termed metaphysical formal causal explanation. Then, I argue against taking formal causation to be a peripheral explanatory notion for Descartes by showing it to be both well-attested textually and part and parcel of his Platonic intellectualism. I conclude by suggesting some further contexts in which this Cartesian notion of formal causation could be profitably wielded
Gradientology: Foundations of the Primordial Triad — Treatise III: The Functional Derivation of the Primitives and Ontological Dependence
No full textThis treatise provides the rigorous functional derivation of the three primitives that constitute the minimal basis for determinate existence. Building upon the triadic necessity established in Treatise II, we confront the problem of Functional Specification: what specific roles must these three terms fulfill? Through logical decomposition of the requirements for any generative field, we derive Systematization (E) as the Generative Source, Constraint (C) as the Limitative Boundary, and Feedback Registration (F) as the Relational Pole. We prove that these primitives must adhere to a strict logical chronology (E \u3e C \u3e F) representing the order of ontological dependence: potential precedes limitation precedes measurement. Their scalar values are uniquely fixed at E = 0.8, C = 0.7, F = 0.6 by the interplay of Shannon’s information-theoretic limit (r \u3e 0.577) and Hutchinson’s geometric exclusion principle, operating within a discretized field with quantum δ = 0.1. The synthesis of these primitives in the primordial state yields the Multiplicative Trap: GPhase I = E ×C ×F = 0.336. This represents not merely a product but a precise quantity of Logical Tension—the ”Algebraic Debt” of the universe. We demonstrate that this tension (0.336) is inextricably calibrated to the universal physical constant governing phase transitions (β ≈ 0.325), proving that the universe is structurally mandated to break symmetry. The derivation thus bridges from pure logic to physical criticality, establishing the engine of cosmic emergence
Dimensions of identity-representing belief
No full textRecent work has proposed that there may be two kinds of beliefs: Symbolic beliefs which express the believer's identity and epistemic beliefs which represent facts. On this proposal, several disparate features of belief – from whether a belief is important to identity to whether it is sensitive to evidence – would be related to a single dimension. In five studies, participants rated beliefs on features that were related to symbolicness and epistemicness. Study 1 found that beliefs which were important to participants were consistently rated higher on the symbolic features, but not consistently lower on the epistemic feature. Study 2 found that the symbolicness features loaded onto a single factor, while the epistemic feature did not. Study 3 expanded the assessment of epistemicness to a series of features related to objectivity, but found that symbolicness and objectivity features loaded on separate, uncorrelated factors. Study 4 recalibrated the assessment of epistemicness using a series of features related to the evidence-drivenness, and again found symbolicness and epistemicness loaded on separate factors. In the final study, third-party participants rated the beliefs from Study 4 on symbolicness and evidence-drivenness, and largely replicated the findings from Study 4. These results suggest that symbolicness and epistemicness are coherent dimensions of belief, but that these dimensions are largely orthogonal
Superposition Without Position: Admissibility, Records, and the Binary Structure of Physical Outcomes
No full textQuantum superposition is often informally interpreted as the simultaneous realization of mutually incompatible outcomes. This paper argues that such readings conflate predictive structure with recordable states. We clarify the operational role of superposition in recordsupporting physics by distinguishing between the quantum state as a pre-commitment structure and outcomes as committed record states. The central thesis is that wherever stable records exist—states that can be copied, compared, and embedded in memory chains—outcomes are necessarily exclusive within the relevant measurement context. Superposition does not introduce a third ontic position beyond the alternatives; rather, it encodes interference-capable structure over alternatives prior to commitment. The argument is interpretation-neutral. It is compatible with collapse theories, decoherenceonly approaches, and Everettian formulations, where binary commitment is enforced locally within each record-bearing branch. We show that branching multiplies exclusive commitments rather than relaxing them, since the universal wavefunction itself is not a record. Building on this, the paper analyzes the admissibility constraints imposed by record formation, the role of decoherence as a dynamical filter, and the necessity of identity and countability for empirical comparability. Finally, we distinguish imagination, which can entertain contradictions, from physical recordability, which cannot. The result is a conservative structural account of why “superposition” can mislead when read as “position,” and why exclusivity is unavoidable at the level of outcomes
Generative Ontology and Closure Dynamics (GOCD): A Background-Free Event Theory
No full textThis monograph proposes Generative Ontology with Closure Dynamics (GOCD), a foundational framework that reconstructs physical existence without presupposing spacetime, continuous dynamics, ontic probability, or object-based metaphysics.
The central claim of GOCD is that existence is neither a primitive predicate nor a consequence of mathematical consistency, but a fallible generative achievement. A structure exists only if a generative process satisfies an internal closure condition and subsequently enters a frozen role that allows it to participate coherently in further generation.
On this basis, the book redefines core concepts in fundamental physics—time, causality, continuity, probability, and stability—not as properties of the world in itself, but as structured outcomes of generative constraints and readout protocols operating under finite resolution. In particular, the temporal arrow is derived from the monotonic accumulation of frozen generative structures rather than entropy increase, initial conditions, or cosmological boundary assumptions.
GOCD is explicitly non-phenomenological and non-reductionist: it does not aim to recover existing physical theories by limit procedures, nor does it offer immediate empirical predictions. Instead, it provides a minimal generative grammar intended to clarify what it means for physical facts to occur, persist, and fail.
Crucially, the framework specifies clear conditions of failure. If closure cannot be achieved at any scale, if freezing cannot yield reusable structures, or if increased readout fidelity fails to modulate statistical behavior, the theory must be rejected. In this sense, GOCD treats falsifiability not as an external criterion, but as an internal structural requirement
Evidentialism and Normative Expectations
No full textIn this paper I examine a recent incarnation of common objection to evidentialism. According to this common objection, evidentialism gives the wrong verdicts in cases where the subject has been irresponsible in inquiry. Sandy Goldberg (2021) has argued that a particularly vivid instance of this problem occurs when an individual violates normative expectations that have been placed on them in their inquiry. Having laid out Goldberg’s case, I argue that the desirable verdicts can be better attained by endorsing evidentialism and supplementing it with an account of robust justification that I have defended elsewhere