University of Victoria Journals
Not a member yet
13485 research outputs found
Sort by
The Imagined Community, Symbolic Cultural Boundaries, and the Other: Discursive Activations of Anti-immigrant Sentiment by Political Parties and the Media in Italy
Italy, like many other European countries, is at a crossroads with its quickly changing socio-cultural demographic landscape and simultaneously heightening nationalist anti-immigrant sentiment that is lighting up the nation. This paper analyzes the concepts of the imagined national community, symbolic boundaries, and the Other in the context of Italian anti-immigrant hostility and moral panic. By examining the discursive logics mobilized by political and media actors against migrants, I identify the discourses that are employed to negatively construct migrant presence in the community, such as that of criminality, amorality, and cultural incompatibility. I argue that such narratives are rooted in the legacies of Italy’s constructions of its own national symbolic boundaries and their identification of the national Self in opposition to the undesirable Other
Case study: Child language project
The following report analyzes English child speech from a video (Sims, 2014) and consists of the following three sections: phonetics and phonology; vocabulary and morphology; as well as syntax, pragmatics, and sociolinguistics. The transcription of the video in both IPA and English is included in the Appendix for reference. The purpose of this report is to simply analyze English child speech to gain experience for further child speech analyses and therefore no predictions or research questions are present.
Keywords: Child language; child speech; case stud
Niels Jørgen Cappelørn, Alastair Hannay, Bruce H. Kirmmse, Joel D. S. Rasmussen, Vanessa Rumble, and David D. Possen, (Eds.), "Kierkegaard’s Journals and Notebooks Volume 11: Part 2, Loose Papers, 1843-1855."
The Challenges of Indigenous Oral History Since Mitchell v Minister of National Revenue
This article answers two questions: How has the Supreme Court of Canada’s Mitchell v Minister of National Revenue decision been operationalized by trial-level courts? Based on these findings, does this decision make room for Aboriginal title and rights claimants to contest dominant understandings of Indigenous presence in the Canadian settler state? Examining the reasoning of six trial-level court decisions, this article finds that Mitchell was operationalized in four of the cases to exclude Indigenous oral history evidence. In its application by trial courts, this article argues that Mitchell does not create opportunities for Indigenous challenges to colonial spatial relationships