NLSIU Scholarship Repository
Not a member yet
2002 research outputs found
Sort by
A Tale of Diplomacy and Equity: India’s Strive Towards COVID-19 Vaccine Pricing and Procurement
No full textEsha Ekta Apartments Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. and Others v. Municipal Corporation of Mumbai and Others
No full text
ANI vs OpenAI: India’s Copyright Act is Outdated. Can it Deal with New Legal Conundrums?
No full textLast month, a group of digital news publishers in India sought to join a case filed by news agency ANI in the Delhi High Court accusing the US firm OpenAI of misusing material to which they own the copyright. However, in India, OpenAI faces a major hurdle. India’s Copyright Act of 1957 and related jurisprudence favours the rights of authors and creators and was not designed to deal with the challenges posed by this emerging technology. Further, tortious claims of unfair competition cant apply in such disputes due to precedent
Copy Trading Unveiled: The Regulatory Need for Investor Protection in India
No full textRapid fintech advancements have grappled regulators worldwide with the complex task of balancing innovation with investor protection. This paper delves into the evolving landscape of financial technology, with a specific focus on copy trading. Through a comprehensive review of existing literature, it becomes evident that there exists a significant gap in research concerning the regulatory framework governing copy trading in India. To bridge this gap, we initiate an academic discourse on copy trading, its prevailing models, and the existing domestic regime. We examine the need for regulatory oversight by SEBI of copy trading in India, driven by key concerns such as the presence of unqualified signal providers, excessive risk-taking by inexperienced investors, and the amplification of these issues by potential conflicts of interest. To address these challenges, we draw from international regulatory initiatives like ESMA’s Supervisory Briefing, alongside efforts by the FCA, among others. We propose a tailored regulatory framework suited to the Indian context, which includes the following key measures: (i) placing the responsibility on copy trading platforms to ensure that no unqualified signal providers operate on their platform, (ii) implementing dynamic classification of signal providers to mitigate excessive risk and enforce adequate risk disclosures by intermediaries, and (iii) mandating clear disclosures regarding affiliations between signal providers and the trades they recommend, to address potential conflicts of interest
Uttarakhand Uniform Civil Code: Excessive Bureaucracy, Few Rights
No full textThe Uttarakhand law may violate privacy and religious freedoms by imposing controls on marriage, live-ins, and divorce – measures that can disproportionately burden women and inter-faith couples. This surveillance risks undermining rights rather than safeguarding them
