Czasopismo Prawno-Historyczne
Not a member yet
3153 research outputs found
Sort by
Piotr Szopa, „W imieniu Rzeczypospolitej…”. Wymiar sprawiedliwości Polskiego Państwa Podziemnego na terenie Podokręgu AK Rzeszów, wyd. IPN O/Rzeszów, Rzeszów 2014, ss. 616.
Periodyki późnej epoki stanisławowskiej jako źródła dla historyka prawa ustrojowego. O „Gazecie Narodowej i Obcej” oraz „Pamiętniku Historyczno-Polityczno-Ekonomicznym”
The following contribution is devoted to the informative and political journalism of the Stanislaw II Augustus era. It may constitute a secondary source for the research of law historians, particularly in the studies of the history of the system of government. Among other things, the article refers to “The Index of Bills” (Polish Seriarz Projektów do Prawa) which may be regarded as the first Polish legal periodical. Special attention is devoted to two landmark journals of the Great Sejm period, namely “The National and Foreign Newspaper” (Polish Gazeta Narodowa i Obca) and “The Historical, Political and Economical Journal” (Polish Pamiętnik Historyczno-Polityczno-Ekonomiczny), as well as to their editors. “The National and Foreign Newspaper” became the most popular contemporary periodical (1791-1792) which promulgated the subject matter of the proceedings and the effects of the legislative work of the Great Sejm. Moreover, it was shaping political sympathies of its readers in a relatively subtle way. On the other hand, particular commitment to politics and social policy was expressed by Piotr Świtkowski who was the editor and the publisher of “The Historical, Political and Economical Journal” (1782-1792). The end of both publications was brought about by the legal acts of the Targowica Confederation
Przemysław Marcin Żukowski, Wydział Prawa Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego Krakowie w latach 1918–1939, Księgarnia Akademicka, Kraków 2016, stron 574; idem, Wydział Prawa Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego w Krakowie w latach 1918–1939. Źródła, Księgarnia Akademicka, Kraków 2017, stron 514
Anna Stawarska-Rippel, Elementy prywatne i publiczne w procesie cywilnym w świetle prac kodyfikacyjnych w Polsce (1918–1964). Studium historycznoprawne, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, Katowice 2015, ss. 429
Lech Krzyżanowski, Sędziowie II Rzeczypospolitej. Okręgi apelacyjne: krakowski i katowicki, 2011
Uwagi o metodzie badań historycznoprawnych. W związku z rozprawą Jerzego Kolarzowskiego, Idea praw jednostki w pismach Braci Polskich. U narodzin nowożytnej koncepcji praw człowieka, 2009
Piotr Szymaniec, Koncepcje wolności religijnej Rozwój historyczny i współczesny stan debaty w zachodniej myśli polityczno-prawnej, Wydawnictwo ATUT, Wrocław 2017, ss. 264
Między Konstytucją 3 Maja a Targowicą. Poglądy polskich republikantów w latach 1791-1793
The paper aims to present the political aspect of the Republican opposition to the succession to the throne between 1791 and 1793, an uneasy period for the politically divided Polish Republicans. The main focus of the paper is on the political aspects of selected examples that illustrate the dilemmas and contradicting ideas of the Republican thought towards the end of the Republican movement, represented by Polish gentry. The pro-constitutional option adopted by the former opponents of the succession is illustrated by the most famous statements declared by its ardent supporters: Adam Wawrzyniec Rzewuski and Wojciech Turski. Their writings confirm that the earlier criticism of the succession they showed, had not determined the later criticism of the Constitution, although they still a much more serious task, having to justify and explain their former attitudes and motives that governed their earlier actions. As it can be seen, public support of the Constitution did not necessarily demand changing one’s opinions completely, or, in particular, it did not mean that all elements of the former rhetoric had to be abandoned. Later in the paper, two other opposing views are presented, one of Leonard Olizar and one of Szczêsny Potocki. Both were articulated after the victory of the Targowica Confederation, but still before the unexpected second partition. Those opinions, although critical in general, are not void of elements suggesting other concerns and political dilemmas their authors and other Republicans shared in the face of the dramatic developments in Poland