Hakkari Üniversitesi Akademik Veri Yönetim Sistemi
Not a member yet
    6688 research outputs found

    İstanbul Terkos (Durusu) Gölü’nün Ornitolojik Potansiyeli ve Kıyı Su Kuşları Yoğunluk Dağılımlarının Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri (CBS) Kullanılarak Belirlenmesi

    No full text
    Bu çalışma Terkos (Durusu) Gölü’nde yürütüldü. Çalışmanın amacı alanın ornitolojik potansiyelinin Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri (CBS) kullanarak ortaya konmasıdır. 2015 ve 2018 yılları arasında yürütülen çalışma sonucunda 19 takımdan oluşan 51 familyaya ait 198 tür tespit edildi. Türleri, birey sayısını ve popülasyon yoğunluğunu gözlemlemek için hat boyu ve nokta sayımları kullanıldı. Bu türlerden 56 tanesinin üreme için “Kesin” ve “Muhtemel” koduna sahip olduğu belirlendi. 56 kuş türünden 31’i kesin üreme ve 25’i muhtemel üreyen tür olduğu tespit edildi. Alanda tespit edilen türlerin göç durumlarına göre 32 (%16.2)’sinin sadece kış aylarında görüldüğü Kış Ziyaretçisi (KZ), 55 (%27.8)’inin alanı ilkbahar ve sonbahar göç döneminde kullandığı Transit Göçer (T), 38 (%19.2)’inin alanda sürekli görüldüğü Yerli (Y) ve 73 (%36.9)’ü ise çalışma alanını yalnız yaz aylarında kullanan Yaz Ziyaretçisi (YZ) statüsünde olduğu belirlendi. Ayrıca koruma statülerinden IUCN koruma kategorilerine göre türlerden 183 (%92.4)’i Düşük riskli (LC-Least Concern), 7 (%3.5)’si Tehlikeye yakın (NT-Near Threatened), 6 (%2.0)’sı Hassas (VU-Vulnerable), 1 (%0.5)’i Tehdit altında (EN-Endangered) statüsünde ve 1 (%0.5) tür ise kapsama dâhil edilmemiştir. Alanda 74 kıyı ve su kuşunun sazlık, bataklık, ormanlık, çayırlık alan, açık göl yüzeyi ve tarım arazisi gibi habitatları tercih ettiği görüldü. Kıyı ve su kuşlarının üremek için en çok çayırlık ve sazlık alanları, beslenmek için ise açık göl yüzeyi habitatını tercih ettiği tespit edilmiştir. Çalışma alanının avcılık, düzensiz yapılaşma, habitat tahribatı gibi yoğun insan baskısı altında olduğu tespit edilmiştir.This study was carried out in Lake Terkos (Durusu). The aim of the study is to reveal the ornithological potential of the area using Geographic Information Systems (GIS). As a result of the study carried out between 2015 and 2018, 198 species belonging to 51 families consisting of 19 Ordo were identified. Line transects and Point counts were used to observe species, the number of the individual and population density. It was determined that 56 of these species had the "Certain" and "Probable" code for breeding. Of the 56 bird species, 31 were detected as certainly while 25 re probable breeding species. According to the immigration status of the area, it was observed that 32 (16.2%) were seen in winter only, Winter Visitor (WV) and 55 (27.8%) were using the area during spring and autumn migration season, Transit Migrant (TM), 38 (19.2%) were constantly seen in the field Residant (R) and 73 (36.9%) were seen in summer only in the area, Summer Visitor (SV) status. In addition, according to IUCN threat categories, 183 of species (92.4%) were classified as Least Concern (LC), 7 (3.5%) were classified as Near Threatened (NT), 6 (3.0%) were classified as Vulnerable (VU), 1 (0.5%) was classified as Endangered (EN) and 1 (0.5%) species were not included in the coverage. It was determined that 74 coastal and waterbirds preferred habitats such as reeds, swamps, woodlands, meadows, open water surface and agricultural land. It has been observed that coastal and water birds preferred mostly grassland and reeds to breed, and open water surface to feed. It has been detected that the study area was under intense human pressures such as hunting, irregular settlement, habitat destruction

    BETALAINS APPLICATION IN THE FOOD INDUSTRY

    No full text

    Basra Zahitlerinden Utbetül-Gulâm’ın Züht Anlayışı

    No full text

    Rekreasyon Farkındalığı

    No full text

    Noise Experiences of Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty During the Intraoperative Process: A Mixed-design Study

    No full text
    Purpose The study was conducted to determine the experiences of patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty regarding the noise they were exposed to in the operating room and recovery unit. Design The study employed a mixed-methods design. Methods The study was conducted between March and June 2024 in a public hospital located in the Mediterranean region of Turkey. The sample consisted of 20 patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty. Quantitative data were collected using the Patients’ Descriptive Characteristics Form, Surgical Fear Questionnaire, Surgical Period Data Collection Form, and Numerical Rating Scale. Qualitative data were obtained through a Semi-Structured Interview Form. The data were analyzed using MAXQDA 2022 and SPSS (24.0) software. Findings The mean age of the patients participating in the study was 66.4 ± 7.72 years and 75% were female. Preoperative anxiety was present in 70% of the patients, whereas 60% stated that they were not disturbed by intraoperative noise. The mean total score of the Surgical Fear Questionnaire was 36.15 ± 14.81, indicating a moderate level of surgical fear. Patients who were disturbed by intraoperative noise had a higher mean total score on the Surgical Fear Questionnaire. In the qualitative phase of the study, three main themes and nine codes related to these themes were identified, reflecting the patients' experiences of noise. The main themes were defined as “Sounds,” “Emotions,” and “Coping.” Conclusions This study revealed that patients with high preoperative anxiety experienced more surgical fear during surgery and were more disturbed by auditory stimuli. Motor and hammer sounds increased feelings of fear in some patients, while music was found to be disturbing and associated with headaches by some participants. Some patients were observed to turn to spiritual coping strategies to cope with these stimuli

    0

    full texts

    6,688

    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    Hakkari Üniversitesi Akademik Veri Yönetim Sistemi
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Open Research Online? Become a CORE Member to access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard! 👇