Dspace, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University
Not a member yet
2327 research outputs found
Sort by
One Episode of Onim's Informativeness
ეძღვნება პროფესორ თინათინ მარგველაშვილის ხსოვნას (1924 – 2006) / Dedicated to Memory of Prof. Tinatin Margvelashvili (1924 – 2006)In the lexical fund of every language, the proper names and surnames of people occupy an important and very special place. Not infrequently, with an anthroponym-patronym or toponym found in a historical document, it becomes possible to study some historical episode of ethnos, to determine who lived in this or that place many years ago.
Most of the anthroponyms have come down to us from ages long past. Almost every name contains information about the time and place of its origin. The fact that onomastics has been separated into a separate field of linguistics is due to the genesis and functional- informational specificity of proper names, which rarely happens when studying a logical class with linguistic status. In many cases, anthroponyms are indispensable material for determining the semantic variation, grammatical structure and etymological origins of words.
The anthroponyms has always been open to borrowings, and that's why foreign proper names appeared next to national proper names in all languages. Kartvelian languages are no exception. The establishment of foreign names is related to religion, political situation, literary influence, economic-cultural relations, people's contacts, etc.
That is why there are so many Jewish-Greek-Roman names in the Kartvelian area, the spread of which is due to the establishment of the Christian religion. Persian, Arabic, Turkic names are the result of historical relations. The layer of European names is relatively late - XIX-XX centuries. Proper names of oriental origin have been identified and studied by Georgian orientalists of different generations.
It is the early stage of anthroponymization, which is named according to one or another characteristic of a person. Many words denoting physical structure, hair color, habitual defect or dignity became a nickname, then a name and in this way got into the root of the surname. This nomination characterizes all anthroponymic systems without exception. Cf.: Georgian /grʒeli/ ‘long’, Hebrew Admoni 'red', Turkish Kara 'black', Russian Белый 'white', German Klein 'small', ets.
In the report, we present the linguistic research of three surnames – Burnusuzashvili, Parmaksizashvili, Parlagashvili – in the following way:
The surname formant of all three family names - /-shvili/ - is Georgian; All three surnames are from the patronymic of Jews from Akhaltsikhe; At the root of all three surnames are Turkish word forms:
Turk. burun 'nose' + /-suz/ (affix of not having); burunsuz 'noseless'; /burnusuz/ +/- a/ (Georgian anthroponymic affix) + /-švili/ (Georgian surname formant);
Turk. parmak 'finger'+ /-sız/ (Turk. affix of not having ); parmaksız ‘ fingerless’; /p’armaxsiz /+/-a/ (Georgian anthroponymic affix)+/- švili/ (Georgian surname formant);
Turk. parlag 'glossy'; /p’arlag +/-a/ (Georgian anthroponymizing affix)+ /-švili/ (Georgian surname formant);
The material of two ethnoses belonging to these surnames – Turkish and Georgian – is a manifestation of the third – Jewish – ethnos
About the importance of the region landscape in the development of tourism
1. ნ. კაციტაძე., ლ. კოჭლამაზაშვილი. „კახეთის რეგიონის ტურისტული
პოტენციალი“ . ჟურნ. „საქართველოს ეკონომიკა“ #1 2006
2. თ. ყანდაშვილი, მ.ფირანაშვილი, ლ.კალმახეილძე, ი.ქორიძე “ეკოტურიზმის
განვითარების შესაძლებლობები ლაგოდეხის მუნიციპალიტეტში“. სტუ-ს
კონფერენცია 2023 წლის 25 მაისი.
3. ნ. ხოზრევანიძე , თ. ქობლიანიძე, ლ.კოჭლამაზაშვილი, „ტურიზმის მდგრადი
განვითარების გამოწვევები და პერსპექტივები მთიან
რეგიონეში“.თბილისი, საგამომცემლო სახლი „ტექნიკური უნივერსიტეტი“. 2023
4. შენგელია ნ. ინვესტიციების ოპტიმალური გამოყენებისა და თანაფარდობის
თავისებურებები. ჟ. „ეკონომიკა“. #8. 2014.
5. ქათამაძე დ., ქათამაძე გ. საერთაშორისო ტურიზმი. 2013.
6.Katsitadze, N., & Natsvlishvili, I. (2020). “The Role of State Regulation and Policy in
Tourism Development: The Case of Georgia”. In Eurasian Economic Perspectives (pp. 419-
434).
7.Katsitadze, N., Baliashvili, E., Kochlamazashvili, L., Tushishvili, N. (2022). PROMOTING
THE DEVELOPMENT OF TOURISM CLUSTERS FOR INCLUSIVE DEVELOPMENT OF
MOUNTAINOUS REGIONS., ISBN 978-9941-492-80-8.
8.Katsitadze N., Tushishvili, N. (2022). The way to save the mountainous regions of
Georgia is the clustering of tourism !!! Economics & Business (1987-5789), 2023, Issue 4,
p173., ISSN 1987-5789The article - "About the importance of the region landscape in the development of tourism" talks about how the natural landscape of the region affects the development of one or another type of tourism. A region where there is no fertile land and an agro-sector developed on its basis, we cannot organize farming tourism, where there are no waterfalls and flowing rivers - poor tourism, where there are no attractive landscapes, flower beds, fields - leisure tourism and etc.
In the article, Kakheti region is divided into bar and mountain zone. In the bar area (Alazni Valley), priority is given to wine tourism, agrotourism and farming tourism based on viticulture, and in the mountain area (mainly Mtatusheti) to mountain tourism.
The development of these types of tourism in Kakheti region has already started, but this process is very chaotic.
Therefore, most of the registered enterprises do not work.
The article expresses the opinion that the private tourism business needs more help from the regional leadership - in providing information, conducting trainings and et
ნოდარ შოშიაშვილის გახსენება
https://geohistory.humanities.tsu.ge/ge/procedings/83-shromebi/179-shromebi-20.html
ივანე ჯავახიშვილის სახელობის თბილისის სახელმწიფო უნივერსიტეტის ჰუმანიტარულ მეცნიერებათა ფაკულტეტის საქართველოს ისტორიის ინსტიტუტის შრომები შესულია ERIH PLUS-ში (The European Reference Index for the Humanities and the Social Sciences) / This journal was approved on 23.10.2024 according to ERIH PLUS criteria for inclusio
Pragmatism of Technopolis and a New Discourse of Chistian Ethics
The postmodern era, sometimes evaluated as a post-religious age,
sometimes as religious fundamentalism, gives rise to alternative assessments
of the Christian understanding of the process of secularization.
For the American philosopher and theologian Harvey Cox, influenced by
Dietrich Bonhoeffer and Max Weber, secularization is directly related to
“man’s coming to age” and “the disenchantment of the World”. Christianity,
as universal and radically open, is considered in a cross-cultural
perspective. A theological portrait of a secular city, with a new discourse
and a new paradigm of behavior, is created, a living and concrete
realization of the old age symbol of the “The City of God”.
Cox presents history in three epochs: mythological, ontological and
pragmatic. In the mythological epoch, the subject and the object merge
in the magical world. In the ontological period the sacred is separated
from the profane. A person is freed from the fear of magic, and an ontological
thinking is born. The thinking formed in the pragmatic era becomes
a tool for those behaviors that are needed /necessary for the functioning
of society. In a secularized world, ontological thinking is no longer
necessary, people are freed from thinking about metaphysical, supernatural
beings. If secularization designates the content of man’s coming of
age, urbanization describes the context in which it is occurring. It is the
“shape” of the new society which supports its peculiar cultural style.
In the era of pragmatism a city of a new discourse – “Technopolis” –
is created. Technopolis represents a new species of human community.
Here things are transformed into actions, nouns of ontological period
turn into verbs. Technopolis is the cumulative social face of the new secular
world – with two characteristics: mobility and anonymity. Its lifestyle
is pragmatic. Its inhabitant is “pragmatic” and “profane”, the one
who lives there does not need to ask existentially formulated “ultimate”
questions; these questions, like existentialism, belong to the past. “The
urban-secular man arrived to town after the funeral of religious worldview
was already over. He feels no sense of deprivation and has no interest
of mourningp he feels that the questions he is interested in belong
to another field. Therefore, it is senseless and pointless to force the urbanite
to ask religious questions. We have to learn to talk to him all over
again. First of all, we should accept a pragmatic for what he is.” The age
of the secular city, the epoch whose ethos is quickly spreading into every
corner of the globe, is an age of “no religion at all”. It no longer looks to religious rules and rituals for its morality or its meanings. The discourse
that the age of religion constituted in the history of Western civilization
has passed. Accordingly, the century of the “great religious narrative” has
ended. Western traditional theology is no longer able to solve the
standard apologetic task of covering the world with a single Christian
definition. According to Cox, theological discourse today is in a state of
defensiveness and retreat.
Cox’s critique of ontologism fails. Exit from ontologizing is possible
only with hidden ontologisation. The path that begins optimistically
leads from the pragmatic reform of the secular city to pessimistic relativism
An Etude from Grakliani Gora
The inscription of the 10th century B.C. found on Grakliani Hill (“B”
inscription) is still a subject of great interest, and therefore its evaluation
requires careful and measured research. Its graphic analysis once again
indicates that we are dealing with a special case from the point of view
of the introduction of writing, because one part of the Grakliani signs
shows a certain similarity with Aramaic. And here we face a factual case,
because the oldest Aramaic inscription - Guzan (Syria), dates back to 850
BC. However, there is a well-founded opinion of the distinguished German
researcher Klaus Bayer that perhaps a variant of Aramaic writing
system “was formed in the 11th-10th centuries BC somewhere in the
East”. I am far from the opinion that Klaus Bayer meant necessarily Georgia
(this is not evident from his works), but his extraordinary logic cannot
be ignored. The archaeological context of the inscription reveals a tendency
towards the cultures of the western part of the Near East (local
Iberian weight standard unit, Neo-Assyrian technologies, chronological
concurrence of economic and intellectual innovations).
Due to this, the question of the genesis and deciphering of the Grakliani
still remains open. Nevertheless, based on the archaeological context
(a two-headed idol of a goddess, sacrificed grains) and ethnographic
material, it can be assumed that the inscription is a prayer dedicated to
the dominant of this chapel - the Great Mother of Gods. The idol had a
separate dedication on the northern wall (“A” inscription, of which only
three letters survived). “B” (central) inscription may begin with the words
“Holy Barn”. Graphically, these two inscriptions are completely different
from each other.
There are archaeological finds on Grakliani Gora that create a clear
picture even at a glance (the introduction of writing, the flourishing of
iron production, the introduction of Neo-Assyrian technologies, etc.) –
10th c B.C. Georgia has entered another phase of prosperity, synchronously
with the most advanced regions, and continues its intellectual ascension
Early childhood educators’ Readiness for an Inclusive Educational Environment
Inclusive Education in Georgia – Achievements, Challenges and Perspectives - 2024
Joint Conference of Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University and Batumi Shota Rustaveli State UniversityEarly childhood teacher-educators have an important role in promoting the development and full integration of children with special educational needs in pre-school educational institutions. According to the professional characteristics defined by the Early Childhood Educator Professional standard (2017), teacher-educator must know "the existing legislation in the field of inclusive education and the principles of inclusive education". Additionally, they must be familiar with "various types of deviations that prevent a child's learning and independent functioning; that contribute to the learning and development of a child with special needs. ’’The mentioned document, in the part regarding the educational environment and process, defines the approaches teacher-educators should implement in order to ensure the following: protection of health and safety of the child, creation of a benevolent and inclusive environment, cooperation of different parties as they relate to the child, and the effectiveness of the educational process.
The development of the competencies of early childhood teacher-educators and the implementation of relevant policies are crucial for ensuring the full development and integration of children with special needs. Even though inclusive education is gaining more and more importance in modern society, problems still arise regarding the adaptation of the environment and resources in preschool educational institutions, complete inclusion of children with special needs in the educational process, and the creation of individual plans and individualization. Most of the above mentioned problems are directly linked to the level of early childhood teacher-educator competencies in the inclusive education field.
The purpose of the research is to study the readiness of teacher-educators for an inclusive educational environment and to reveal the existing challenges. In particular, the study zeroes in on the competencies teacher-educators should have to ensure quality inclusive education at the level of early and preschool education, as well as the ones they already possess. Additionally, the research aims to uncover the challenges and needs the preschool education system faces in this direction and the means to improve the current situation.
Research Methodology: within the framework of a quantitative research, a questionnaire survey of educators and special teachers was conducted, while qualitative research focused on observing the kindergarten environment, educational process and resources. The focus groups for the latter included groups of early childhood educators, special teachers, kindergarten managers and methodologists.
Main Findings: the physical environment and learning resources in preschool educational institutions are not fully adapted to the needs of children with special needs. The scarcity of specialized training materials, technical means and human resources was revealed. Full integration of students with special needs in the process of upbringing and education remains a challenge. Oftentimes, educational processes are not sufficiently adapted to the unique needs and abilities of each child; The need for continuous professional development of early childhood educators in the direction of inclusive education was stressed
“As Timaeus says” in Petritsi
In the commentary on Proclus’ Elements of Theology Ioane Petritsi
mentions and discusses not only the issues which are a subject of Proclus’
Elements, but also those which are set forth in other ancient Greek
philosophical treatises. Plato’s Timaeus, along with his other dialogues,
is important for Petritsi for commenting on Proclus’ philosophy.
The aim of this paper is to analyze Petritsi’s point of view on the
creator of the visible world, i.e. the Demiurge of Plato’s Timaeus. The Demiurge of Plato’s Timaeus has an ambiguous role in Petritsi’s commentary.
Petritsi does not analyze his figure as thoroughly as the true
being, soul, intellect, Henads, limit and infinity, or the most important
one – the supreme One. In Petritsi’s commentary the Demiurge is a
craftsman, God, who forms the visible world, although in some cases he
is almost (i.e. quite vaguely and not clearly) identified with the Supreme
One. Or, to put it more precisely, it is the Supreme One who receives in
rare cases the features of a personal God and Demiurge. However, in the
ontological hierarchy exposed by Petritsi, the true being (i.e. the first
being, the father of intellects, the totality of intellects) plays a crucial
role as the prime principle of all kinds of beings and forms, i.e. of everything
except formless matter. Obviously, the true Being is much more
important to Petritsi than the Demiurge, as he mentions the former
regularly. The true Being is for Petritsi the paradigm of Plato’s Timaeus
and the Supreme Intelligible Intellect (nous noētos), while the Demiurge,
as we can conclude, plays a role of an Intellectual Intellect (nous noeros).
Thus, in Petritsi’s commentary, on the one hand, the features of the
supreme One and the Demiurge as producers of the whole universe are
in certain cases virtually identical; though, on the other hand, the Demiurge
represents a lower level of intellect than the true Being and in
many cases, he is absent where a reader of Petritsi’s commentary, following
the context, expects his presence.
How can we explain this ambiguity? I suppose that for Petritsi, interpreting
Proclus’ ontology, it was difficult, on the one hand, to find an
adequate place for the more or less personal character of the begetter
of the visible world while, on the other hand, like other Platonists and
against Aristotelians, he wanted to preserve the role of the demiurgic-
/creative cause in the mechanism of the non-temporal formation of the
universe. Last but not least, Petristi was a Christian, and he wrote his
commentary on Proclus for Christian readers. This was probably a reason
why in some cases the supreme One and the Demiurge received almost
identical characteristics, although Petritsi expressed this very vaguely.
However, in general, Petritsi was an adequate commentator of Proclus’
philosophy: in Petritsi’s opinion, as in Proclus, the demiurgic/creative cause
occupies a lower level than the paternal cause in the hierarchical
chain of causality. Therefore, if the supreme One is to be identified with
the paternal cause and the Demiurge with the demiurgic/creative cause, then the Demiurge must be placed lower than the supreme One. Anyway,
whatever might be the role and character of Plato’s Demiurge in Petritsi’s
philosophy, it cannot be compared with the immense importance and
much more definite characteristic that the true being (i.e. the paradigm
of cosmos in Timaeus) has in Petritsi’s ontological system
Issues of optimizing the use of state budget funds in Georgia
Kukava M. (2016). Sarezervo pondebidan kharjva kvlav seriozul problemad rcheba,
[Spending from Reserve Funds Remains a Serious Problem Transparency. International
Foundation- Georgia, Tbilisi.] in Georgian
Papava I. (2019). Detsentralizatsiis kartuli paradoksi: tsentralizatsia detsentralizatsiis
sakhelit. [Georgian Paradox of Decentralisation: Centralisation Instead of
Decentralisation.] in Georgian https://droa.ge/?p=41594.
Tabatadze M. (2017). sakhelmtsipo martvis detsentralizatsiis institutsiuri segmentirebis
teoriuli sakitkhebi [Theoretical Issues of Institutional Segmentation of State
Management Decentralization.] TSU, II International Scientific Conference, Tbilisi.] in
Georgian https://opac.sciencelib.ge/bib/179808
Tabatadze M. (2020). sivrtsiti ekonomikis prioritetebi da detsentralizatsiis piskaluri
mekanizmebi [Priorities of Spatial Economy and Fiscal Mechanism of
Decentralisation. Journal of International Economic Research, vol. 6(1), p. 13-22, ISSN
2500-9737.] in Georgian https://irissymposium.wixsite.com/jier
Tabatadze M. (2022). pinansuri stabilizatsiis sakhelmtsipo antikrizisuli strategia
[State Anti-crisis Strategy for Financial Stabilization. Collection of Materials of the
International Scientific Conference of the Institute of Economics Named after Paata
Gugushvili TSU, pp. 330-338. Tbilisi.] in Georgian.
http://conferenceconomics.tsu.ge/uploads/images/konfkreb2022.pdf\
IDFE (2019). adgilobrivi tvitmmartvelobis sarezervo pondebis kharjva 2020 tsels,
[Expenditure of local Self-Government Reserve Funds in 2020. LUMUNATE, Tbilisi.] in Georgian. https://idfi.ge/ge/expenditures of contingency funds of local municipalities
in 2020
International Budget Partnership, IBP (2021).
OECD (2019). Making Decentralization Work, a Handbook for Policy-Makers.
Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/regional/making-decentralisation-work-g2g-
9faa7-en.htm
International Monetary Fund (2022). piskaluri detsentralizatsia. [Fiscal Decentralization].
in Georgian. https://data.imf.org/?sk=1c28ebfb-62b3-4b0c-aed3-
048eeebb684f.
Government of Georgia (2019). dadgenileba „Sajaro mmartvelobis repormis 2019-
2020 tslebis samokmedo gegmis damtkitsebis shesakheb“, [Resolution "On
Approval of the 2019-2020 Public Administration Reform Action Plan".] in Georgian.
Government of Georgia (2023). dadgenileba “Sajaro mmartvelobis repormis 2023-
2026 tlebis strategiisa da sajaro mmartvelobis repormis 2023-2024 tslebis
samokmedo gegmis damtitsebis shesakheb” [Resolution on "Approving the Public
Administration Reform Strategy for 2023-2026 and the Public Administration Reform
Action Plan for 2023-2024".] in Georgian.
Ministry of Finance of Georgia (2022). „sakhelmtsipo biujetis kanoni,- mokalakis
gzamkvlevi“ ["State Budget Law,- Citizen's Guide"] in Georgian. https://www.-
mof.ge/images/File/gzamkvlevi/2022/30-12-2021/Citizens% 20Guide%20-%202022-
kanoni.pdf
Ministry of Finance of Georgia (2023). “sakhelmtsipo biujetis kanoni, Mokalakis
gzamkvlevi” ["State Budget Law, - Citizen's Guide.] in Georgian. https://www.mof.-
ge/5677
Ministry of Finance of Georgia (2023). prezidentis sarezervo pondi [President's
Reserve Fund.] in Georgian. https://president.gov.ge/, https://www.matsne.gov.
ge/ka/document/view/5723982?publication=0
Ministry of Finance of Georgia (2017). „sajaro pinansuri martvis reporma
saqartveloshi“ ["Public Finance Management Reform in Georgia". The European
Union for Georgia, pp. 8.] in Georgian. https://bit.ly/3wKcWi9
Ministry of Finance of Georgia (2018). sakartvelos kanoni „sakhelmtsipo biujetis
shesakheb“,- Ganmartebiti barati. [Law of Georgia "On the State Budget”,-
Explanatory Card.] in Georgian.
https://www.mof.ge/5677
https://parliament.ge
http://sa.gov.ge
https://mof.ge/5177
www.geostat.ge
All electronic sources were last viewed on February 15, 2024Effective management of the state budget is an important factor of the country's
financial stabilization and correct forecasting, its basis is the introduction of modern
management principles of the budget system, the formation of an institutional and
legal base corresponding to European standards. The article discusses the role of the
budget system in the unified process of managing the economy of Georgia and
certain features of its functioning, the issues of optimization of vertical budget
segmentation and proper coordination.
On the basis of the Law on Budgetary Systems, government reserve funds have
been created within the state budget of Georgia since 2005 to cover unforeseen
expenses. The operation of this fund is one of the important issues of the state
budget, as, along with the fiscal burden, the Reserve Fund plays a significant role in
financial support for the main priorities of the state’s social policy.
Despite the compliance of the budget system of Georgia with the European
standards, the issue of reserve funds still involves a certain problem. The issues of
structuring and targeting of reserve funds, its legal and institutional provision
require special attention. The problems of formation and effective management of
reserve funds are discussed in the presented report.
The foundation for the formation of Georgia’s modern budget system was
placed by the public financial management reform (2004), which was based on the
principles of the Open Government Partnership (OGP) and on the international
standards of GFSM-2001. The compliance of the legal norms of the budget system of
Georgia with European standards was ensured by the Organic Law “On Economic
Freedom” (2011). An important legal basis for the effective administration of the
budget structure and public finance management was created by the government
decree - “Public Administration Reform” (2019).
The legal basis for the process of harmonizing the functions of budgets at
individual levels in Georgia is made up by the following regulations: Organic laws
“On Local Self-Government and Management” (1997) and “On Local Self-Government”
(2007), Laws “On the Budget of Local Self-Government Units” (2006), “On local
government bodies “On Property” (2006) and others.
According to the budget transparency, which was published in 2021, Georgia
was on the first place from 120 countries in the whole world [20]. According to the
future forecasts, this success will be further consolidated by the implementation of
85% of the legislative obligations provided for the agreement on a deep and
comprehensive free trade zone with the European Union in 2024, in addition to it, all the obligations in the field of public procurement will be fully implemented, as well,
as on customs and technical barriers to trade.
In accordance with the IMF, the fiscal system of Georgia today is normal and its
indicators do not exceed the threshold level of sustainability. The international
standards of fiscal security are also observed, while it has identified a number of
problems, which are necessary to be considered for the stability of the financial
sector and the effective functioning of fiscal mechanisms for regulating the
economy. Here is the list of the following problems, such as:
Long-term provision of financial stability
Effective use of reserve funds
Financial management of state-owned enterprises.
The IMF has given priority for assessing long-term factors of fiscal sustainability,
which are reflected in the international regulatory document - “Multi-year
Indicative Program - MTP” (2020). This document about the delegation of powers
between government and fiscal institutions, provides the formation of the optimal
economic ties, which is only possible while using the conditions of an effective policy
of decentralization of public administration.
The reserve fund of the Georgian government is subordinate to the executive
branch and its volume. According to the state budget for 2024, is set at 80 million
laris (an increase of 33.4%). The fund's expense structure contains:
Unforeseen expenses – 28%
Carrying out events of national importance – 26%
Uninterrupted functioning of budgetary organizations – 13%
Social expenses - 7%
Electoral process services – 3%
Financing of European integration events and political parties -2% and
others.
According to the Georgian legislation, money from the government's reserve is
only allocated to finance expenses. But, not provided for the budget, so, in our days ,
there is a high risk of inefficient use of funds and instability caused by multiple
changes in the distribution of the reserve’s fund, which prevents propering the
budget planning and effective control of its execution.
The process of managing reserve funds of the state budget, is especially
problematic. Similar as to justify the intended purpose of expenses; therefore , it is
necessary to develop a unified standard, which helps us to control the fund funds
instead of unforeseen expenses . In addition to it, it is only recommend to use it in a
force majeure situation and finances such an emergency expenses that could not be
predicted in advance, this will significantly increase the responsibility of spending
organizations for taking into account all the expected expenses when drawing up the
budget, which will eliminate the bad practice of requesting additional funds from the
reserve fund during the year. Also, in emergency situations, it will be allowed to
finance from the reserve fund such unplanned expenses when leaving them without financial support from the state could cause irreparable damage to the country’s
international reputation or its propert.
The issue of targeting transfers transferred from the reserve fund to local
government also requires legal revision, since in some cases, they do not correspond
to the purpose of the targeted, capital or special transfers which are existing today.
To summarize, strictly formulated targeting system will help departments to plan the
budget correctly and determine the exact size of the reserve fund itself, which is an
important condition for the sustainability of Georgia’s budget system
У истоков грузино-литовских межгосударственных взаимоотношений (1494 г.)
https://geohistory.humanities.tsu.ge/ge/procedings/83-shromebi/179-shromebi-20.html
ივანე ჯავახიშვილის სახელობის თბილისის სახელმწიფო უნივერსიტეტის ჰუმანიტარულ მეცნიერებათა ფაკულტეტის საქართველოს ისტორიის ინსტიტუტის შრომები შესულია ERIH PLUS-ში (The European Reference Index for the Humanities and the Social Sciences) / This journal was approved on 23.10.2024 according to ERIH PLUS criteria for inclusio
European experience of green energy development and prospects for Georgia
1. აბესაძე რ. (2019). „მწვანე“ ეკონომიკა: არსი და გამოწვევები. ინტერნეტკონფერენციის მასალები. 2. ბედიანაშვილი გ. (2023). პოსტპანდემიური პერიოდის მაკროსისტემურისოციალურ-ეკონომიკური გამოწვევები. შრომების კრებული, თბილისი, გვ. 41–46. 3. ბედიანაშვილი გ. (2022). კლიმატის ცვლილების გაურკვევლობა და ეკონომიკური ზრდა. კონფერენციის მასალების კრებული. თბილისი. 29-36.
4. გელაშვილი მ. (2022) „მწვანე“ ეკონომიკა - მიზნები და უპირატესობები ბიზნესი და კანომდებლობა, N 2, გვ. 82–87.
5. გუმბო მ. (2017). რატომაა მდგრადი განვითარების მიზნები მნიშვნელოვანი? ელექტრონული პუბლიკაცია, 5 ივნისი. https://idfi.ge/ge/why_does_sdgs_matter
6. დალი მ., სტრზალა კ., კატარზინა მარტონ-გადო კ. (2022). თანამედროვე ტექნოლოგიების როლი ევროპის მწვანე შეთანხმების სტრატეგიის განხორციელებაში. სოციალურ მეცნიერებათა ვექტორები, N 3, გვ.გვ. 5–14
7. ვეზირიშვილი-ნოზაძე ქ., ელენე ფანცხავა ე., თამარ კანაშვილი თ. (2022). ევროპის „მწვანე შეთანხმება“ და მისი გავლენა საქართველოს ენერგეტიკულ სექტორზე.სოციალურ მეცნიერებათა ვექტორები, N 3, გვ. გვ. 39–52
8. ზარნაძე გ. (2023). ეკომარკირება და მისი მნიშვნელობა მწვანე ტრანსფორმაციაში. ახალი ეკონომისტი, N 3, გვ. 41–48.
9. იენე კ. (2022). ევროპის მწვანე შეთანხმების სტრატეგია და დასაქმების შესაძლებლობები. სოციალურ მეცნიერებათა ვექტორები, N 3, გვ. გვ. 28–38
10. კაკულია ე., გოგოხია თ., ბიბილაშვილი, ნ. (2019). „ევროკავშირთან ასოცირების ხელშეკრულება - მწვანე ეკონომიკის მხარდაჭერა საქართველოში“ საერთაშორისო სამეცნიერო კონფერენციის „მწვანე ეკონომიკის ფორმირების თანამედროვე პრობლემები საქართველოში“ მასალების კრებული, თბილისი.
11. კრუგმანი პ. ობსტფელდი მ. მელიტცი მ. (2017). საერთაშორისოეკონომიკა: თეორია და პოლიტიკა. მეათე გამოცემა. ქართული გამოცემის სამეცნიერო და მთავარი რედაქტორი აკადემიკოსი, ავთანდილ სილაგაძე. თბილისი. თსუ გამომცემლობა.
12. მიქაძე ე. „ევროპის მწვანე შეთანხმება და მისი მნიშვნელობა საქართველოსთვის“ თბილისი.
13. ტალიკაძე ნ. (2017). მწვანე ეკონომიკის კონცეფცია და საქართველოს პოზიცია გლობალურ მწვანე ეკონომიკაში. ინტერნეტკონფერენციის მასალები. 14. ჩომახიძე დ. (2022). „რუსეთ-უკრაინის ომმა, ჯაჭვური რეაქციით გამოიწვია საყოველთაო ეკონომიკური და ენერგეტიკული ომებიც“ https://mcm.ge/160049/ 15. ხარშილაძე გ. (2022) საქართველოს ეკონომიკის ძირითადი გამოწვევები, პერსპექტივა და ზეგავლენის ზოგიერთი გამოვლინებანი ევროპის „მწვანე შეთანხმების“ პირობებში. სოციალურ მეცნიერებათა ვექტორები, N 3, გვ. 53–67.
16. ასოცირების შესახებ შეთანხმება ერთის მხრივ, საქართველოსა და მეორეს მხრივ, ევროკავშირს და ევროპის ატომური ენერგიის გაერთიანებას და მათ წევრ სახელმწიფოებს შორის https://matsne.gov.ge/ka/document/download/2496959/0/ge/pdf [უკანასკნელად გადამოწმდა 10.02.2022]; 17. ბუქარესტში ხელი მოეწერება მწვანე ენერგიის განვითარებისა და გადაცემის სფეროში სტრატეგიულ პარტნიორობას. დეკემბერი 17, 2022. https://www.radiotavisupleba.ge/a/32180953.html 18. ილჰამ ალიევი - აზერბაიჯანი, საქართველო, რუმინეთი და უნგრეთი ერთი გუნდის პრინციპით უნდა მუშაობდნენ, მჭიდროდ თანამშრომლობდნენ ევროკავშირთან, ჩვენი ქვეყნები აპირებენ, ევროპაში მწვანე ენერგიის სანდო მიმწოდებლები გახდნენ. 17.12.2022. https://1tv.ge/news/ilham-alievi-azerbaijani-saqartvelo-rumineti-da-ungreti-erti-gundis-principit-unda-mushaobdnen-mchidrod-tanamshromlobdnen-evrokavshirtan-chveni-qveynebi-apireben-evropashi-mwvane-energiis-sando/ 19. მდგრადი განვითარების მიზნების ეროვნული დოკუმენტი. https://www.gov.ge/files/524_74242_575286_2328.pdf
20. მწვანე ალტერნატივა - „მწვანე ეკონომიკის დილემა“ - საჯარო პოლიტიკის ნარკვევი, თბ. 2019. https://greenalt.org/app/uploads/2019/02/Green_Economy_Dilemma_Geo.pdf
21. მწვანე ალტერნატივა - „მწვანე პოლიტიკა და გარემოს დაცვა“ თბ. 2013;
60 გვ., თბილისი. 22. საქართველომ, აზერბაიჯანმა, რუმინეთმა და უნგრეთმა შავი ზღვის გავლით ელექტროენერგიის გადამცემი წყალქვეშა კაბელის პროექტს ხელი მოაწერეს.დეკემბერი 17, 2022.https://1tv.ge/news/saqartvelom-azerbaijanma-ruminetma-da-ungretma-shavi-zghvis-gavlit-eleqtroenergiis-gadamcemi-wyalqvesha-kabelis-proeqts-kheli-moaweres/
23. საქართველოს კლიმატის ცვლილების მწვანე წიგნი საჯარო კონსულტაციებისათვის. საქართველოს პარლამენტის გარემოს დაცვისა და ბუნებრივი რესურსების კომიტეტის კონსულტაცია, თებერვალი, 2023 წ., საქართველოს პარლამენტი. https://webapi.parliament.ge/storage/files/shares/Komitetebi/garemo/green-paper.pdf 24. Abesadze, R. (2019). “Green” and “circular” economy: essence and modern challenges. International Journal of New Economics and Social Sciences IJONESS, 10(2), 329-345.
25.Eichhammer W. et al. Greenhouse Gas Reductions in Germany and the UK: Coincidence or Policy Induced? An Analysis for International Climate Policy. German Environment Ministry, Berlin, 2001.
26. Grotz C. Handbook of Renewable Energies in the European Union: Case Studies of the EU-15 States / Second ed. Peter Lang Verlag. Frankfurt: In: Reiche, D. (Ed.), 2005. 27.Gvelesiani M., & Veshapidze S. (2016) Values: Limits and Contradictions. Globalization & Business. (1): 35-39. (in Georgian) 28.Gvelesiani M., & Veshapidze S. (2016) European values: what can we implement from them and how can we implement them in Georgia. Globalization & Business. (1): 40-46. (in Georgian)
29. Knight, Daniel, M., The green economy as a sustainable alternative?;
30.Komor P. Renewable Energy Policy. New York: iUniverse Inc., 2004.
31.Lipp J. Lessons for effective renewable electricity from Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom // Energy Policy. 2007. № 35. Pр. 5481–5495. 32.Veshapidze, S., & Karchava, L. (2022). Contradictions of Globalization under the COVID19 Pandemic. Bull. Georg. Natl. Acad. Sci, 16(4). 33.Veshapidze, S., Otinashvili, R., Gvarutsidze, A., Abuselidze, G., & Zoidze, G. (2022). Modern technologies to overcome the challenges of globalization. Entrepreneurship, 10(2), 22-32.
34.Bloomberg New Energy Finance. Record $30bn for offshore wind but overall investment down. about.bnef.com/blog/record-30bn-year-offshore-wind-overall-investment. 35.BP Statistical Review of World Energy. London: BP Statistical Review of World Energy, 2017. Clean energy for all Europeans package. https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/energy-strategy/clean-energy-all-europeans-package_en
36.EUROPEAN COMMISSION, COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION of 12.12.2023 on transposing Article 30 on national energy efficiency funds, financing and technical support of the Directive (EU) 2023/1791 on energy efficiency (‘EEDrecast’)https://energy.ec.europa.eu/system/files/202312/C_2023_8558_F1_COMMISSION_RECOMMENDATION_EN_V6_P1_3092829.PDF
37. European Commission, A Clean Planet for all A European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy, COM/2018/773, 2019, Brussels, p. 6
38. European Commission, Sustainable growth for all: choices for the future of social Europe. Executive Summary, Brussels 2019, p. 23.
39. IEA. CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion: Highlights. Paris: OECD/IEA, 2016.
40.IEA. World Energy Outlook 2017: Executive Summary. OECD/IEA, 2017.
41. The Italian Association of Energy Economists (AIEE), Current and Future Challenges to Energy Security, Rome 2019, p. 267. 55 European Commission, Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/87/EC establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Union, Brussels 2021, p. 1. 42.The European Green Deal. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en
43. United Nations General Assembly. Seventieth session. Agenda items 15 and 116. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://undocs.org/A/RES/70/1
44.World Economic Forum. The Global Risks Report 2017: 12th Edition. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2017The subject of this paper is the development of recommendations for the development of renewable energy sources in Georgia. For this purpose, the article analyzes the practice of leading European countries in the field of renewable energy sources. The paper shows: two main mechanisms supporting this industry. The significance of implementation of clean energy promotion measures in Georgia is analyzed and recommendations for their improvement are given