SAS Open Journals
Not a member yet
    4299 research outputs found

    Recommendations for the probity of computer evidence

    Get PDF
    There exists widespread misunderstanding about the nature of computers and how and why they are liable to fail. The present approach to the disclosure or discovery and evaluation of evidence produced by computers in legal proceedings is unsatisfactory. The central problem is the evidential presumption that computers are reliable. This presumption is not warranted. To this end, recommendations are proposed to rectify this problem with the aim of increasing the probability of a fair trial. Index words: electronic evidence; computer systems; disclosure; discovery; recommendations for judges; fairness of legal proceeding

    Case Transcript - Bates v Post Office Limited, TLQ 17 4055 Day 3 13 March 2019

    No full text
    Case Transcript - Bates v Post Office Limited, TLQ 17 4055 Day 3 13 March 2019 England & Wales; theft; electronic evidence; Post Office Horizon System; ‘reliability’ of computer

    Full issue

    No full text

    Medical Negligence Dispute Resolution in China: Social Stability and Preventative Measures

    Get PDF
    Medical negligence is an important issue in China today, threatening to undermine the party-state policy objectives of social stability and the right to health, thus requiring effective solutions. China’s response includes a dispute resolution regime for issues of medical negligence, structured as a bifurcated administrative and court regime and supplemented by mediation. This Note examines this dispute resolution regime, its difficulties and possible ways of reform. More specifically, it explores whether the current assignment of liability is appropriate when considered in the context of the system’s relationship to the policy objective of social stability and suggests that social stability may be more efficiently achieved by greater utilization of preventative measures. Keywords: medical negligence; medical disputes; China; mediation; social stability; right to health

    Profiles of Contributors to Articles, Review Article and Notes

    No full text

    Visual Law: Repealing the Vagrancy Act 1824

    No full text
    Visual Law: Repealing the Vagrancy Act 182

    Full issue

    No full text

    Editor's introduction

    No full text
    In this Editorial, Tugçe Yalçin (Editor-in-Chief of ISLRev, Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, University of London) welcomes you to the COVID Special issue of the IALS Student Law Review (ISLRev) and introduces the articles featured in this issue of the journal

    Pop goes the diesel! A Case comment on Case C‑343/19 Verein fur Konsumenteninformation v Volkswagen AG

    Get PDF
    Case C 343/19 Verein fur Konsumenteninformation v Volkswagen AG   is an EU jurisdictional dispute about an Austrian consumer claim concerning vehicles that were defectively manufactured by a German company. The resulting decision by the Court of the Justice of the European Union (CJEU) granted jurisdiction for Austrian courts to hear the case. This case comment will proceed in five steps. Firstly, it provides a summary of the facts. Secondly, it lays down the jurisdictional rules per Brussels I Regulation 2012 (Brussels I),  and the precedent surrounding Article 7(2) Brussels I on alternative jurisdiction for torts. Thirdly, it agrees with the CJEU that the place of final purchase before the scandal (Austria) is the place of initial damage. Fourth, it criticises the CJEU’s characterisation of the case as one involving material damage rather than pure financial loss, while using reasoning from pure financial loss case to justify granting alternative jurisdiction in the present dispute. Finally, this comment laments that the CJEU failed to (1) clarify alternative jurisdiction rules for when the place of purchase and place of marketing are different, and (2) flesh out substantive criteria for what ‘other specific circumstances’ are required in order to grant Article 7(2) alternative jurisdiction

    An approach to the judicial evaluation of evidence from computers and computer systems

    Get PDF
    The evaluation of evidence derived from a complex computer system is difficult: past experience of reliable operation in general is an uncertain guide to the value of specific evidence in a particular case. By setting the evidence in question in the context of the complete transaction to which it pertains, and tracking the system’s processing path for the transaction, better guidance may be obtained. Difficulty in elucidating the processing path may itself cast doubt on the evidence in question.   Index words: complexity, computer, evidence, path, transactio

    3,074

    full texts

    4,299

    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    SAS Open Journals
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Open Research Online? Become a CORE Member to access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard! 👇