Repository of Shinshu
Not a member yet
23655 research outputs found
Sort by
教師が「子どもを見る」とは : 自身の振り返りを手がかりに
No full textArticle平成29年度 信州大学大学院教育学研究科高度教職実践専攻（教職大学院）実践研究報告書抄録集 : 5-8(2018)departmental bulletin pape
ジベンゾイルメタンフッ化ホウ素錯体の集合状態に依存した発光特性
No full textArticle信州大学教育学部研究論集 12:115-122(2018)departmental bulletin pape
Estimation Procedures and TFP Analysis of the JIP Database 2006 (Revised)
No full textArticleRIETI Discussion Paper Series. : 07-E-003(2007)technical repor
東日本大震災の経済的影響 : 過去の災害との比較、サプライチェーンの寸断効果、電力供給制約の影響
No full text本稿は、東日本大震災の経済的影響を分析したもので、次の3つの内容から構成されている。第1章では、既存研究をサーベイして震災被害の概念を整理するとともに、今回の東日本大震災の経済的被害を、1995年に発生した阪神淡路大震災や、その他の世界の大災害の被害と比較している。第2章では、東日本大震災の産業別被害額の大きさを推計するとともに、それによって生じたサプライチェーン途絶効果の大きさを、地域間産業連関表を使って、産業連関の供給側の波及である前方連関の概念に基づき、製造業の投入におけるボトルネック効果も考慮しつつ分析している。第3章では、福島第一原発の事故に伴い国内の原子力発電の稼働に深刻な困難が予想されるようになったことなどから、短期的な電力制約や、発電方法の代替によって生じる電力価格上昇が、国内経済にどのような影響を与えるかを分析している。ArticleRIETI Discussion Paper Series. : 12-P-004(2012)technical repor
Regional Factor Inputs and Convergence in Japan: A macro-level analysis, 1955-2008
No full textUsing the Regional-Level Japan Industrial Productivity (R-JIP) Database, which provides data on aggregate industry value added and production factor inputs by prefecture for 1955-2008, we examined the reasons for the decline in prefectural economic inequality from the supply side. In addition, we focused on the role of capital accumulation and changes in total factor productivity (TFP) in economic convergence. We examined how the relatively rapid capital accumulation in low-income prefectures was financed and what brought about the decline in differences in TFP. The main findings of the analysis are as follows.1) In 1955, the most important reason for prefectural labor productivity differences was differences in TFP, followed by differences in capital-labor ratios and then by differences in labor quality. Differences in capital-labor ratios and TFP declined substantially between 1955 and 2008, leading to a dramatic reduction in prefectural labor productivity differences. On the other hand, depending on the period, prefectural differences in labor quality either did not contribute to the contraction in labor productivity differences or in fact worked in the direction of increasing such differences. 2) During the high-speed growth era from 1955-1970, the main factor underlying the decline in prefectural labor productivity differences was the decline in TFP differences. On the other hand, from 1970 onward, Japan experienced a strong decline in regional differences in inputs, so that the contribution of variation in inputs to variation in output steadily dropped after 1970. 3) Migration from poorer to richer prefectures and the decline in prefectural TFP differences from 1955 to 2008 consistently contributed to the decline in per capita gross prefectural product (GPP) differences, although the contribution of the decline in prefectural TFP differences to β-convergence—for the period as a whole—was more than twice as large as the contribution of migration. On the other hand, capital accumulation actually worked in the direction of increasing prefectural inequality in the period 1955-1970, but from 1970 onward, it consistently operated in the direction of reducing inequality. 4) The accumulation of social capital, measured in relation to working hours, in post-war Japan, was concentrated in prefectures with lower per capita GPP. Given that the accumulation of social capital likely raises the efficiency of economic activity and hence has a positive effect on TFP, the emphasis on improving social infrastructure in poorer rural areas very likely contributed to the decline in prefectural TFP differences. Meanwhile, the expansion of firms with high labor productivity into rural areas and technology transfers to technologically lagging prefectures through intra-firm technology diffusion, as well as the growing agglomeration of industry in rural areas through the expansion of manufacturing in rural areas, also likely contributed greatly to the decrease in prefectural TFP differences.ArticleRIETI Discussion Paper Series. : 15-E-123(2015)technical repor
アメリカ合衆国における再生可能エネルギーの普及促進に関する近時の動向と法的課題(1) : 太陽光・風力を中心とした日本への示唆
No full textArticle信州大学経法論集 3:1-49(2018)departmental bulletin pape
