University of Wyoming Open Journals
Not a member yet
    3193 research outputs found

    On m-th roots of complex matrices

    No full text
    For an n×nn\times n matrix MM, σ(M)\sigma(M) denotes the set of all different eigenvalues of MM. In this paper, we will prove two results on the mm-th (m2)(m\geq2) roots of a matrix AA. Firstly, let XX be an mm-th root of AA. Then XX can be expressed as a polynomial in AA if and only if rank X2X^2= rank XX and σ(X)=σ(A)|\sigma(X)|=|\sigma(A)|. Secondly, let XX and YY be two mm-th roots of AA. If both XX and YY can be expressed as polynomials in AA, then X=YX=Y if and only if σ(X)=σ(Y)\sigma(X)=\sigma(Y)

    Kronecker products of Perron similarities

    No full text
    An invertible matrix is called a Perron similarity if one of its columns and the corresponding row of its inverse are both nonnegative or both nonpositive. Such matrices are of relevance and import in the study of the nonnegative inverse eigenvalue problem. In this work, Kronecker products of Perron similarities are examined and used to construct ideal Perron similarities all of whose rows are extremal

    Compatibility and companions for Leonard pairs

    No full text
    In this paper, we introduce the concepts of compatibility and companion for Leonard pairs. These concepts are roughly described as follows. Let F\mathbb{F} denote a field, and let VV denote a vector space over F\mathbb{F} with finite positive dimension.A Leonard pair on VV is an ordered pair of diagonalizable F\mathbb{F}-linear maps A:VVA : V \to V and A:VVA^* : V \to V that each act in an irreducible tridiagonal fashion on an eigenbasis for the other one. Leonard pairs A,AA,A^* and B,BB,B^* on VV are said to be compatible whenever A=BA^* = B^* and [A,A]=[B,B][A,A^*] = [B,B^*], where [r,s]=rssr[r,s] = r s - s r. For a Leonard pair A,AA,A^* on VV, by a companion of A,AA,A^* we mean an F\mathbb{F}-linear map K:VVK: V \to V such that KK is a polynomial in AA^* and AK,AA-K, A^* is a Leonard pair on VV. The concepts of compatibility and companion are related as follows. For compatible Leonard pairs A,AA,A^* and B,BB,B^* on VV, define K=ABK = A-B. Then KK is a companion of A,AA,A^*. For a Leonard pair A,AA,A^* on VV and a companion KK of A,AA,A^*,define B=AKB = A-K and B=AB^* = A^*. Then B,BB,B^* is a Leonard pair on VV that is compatible with A,AA,A^*. Let A,AA,A^* denote a Leonard pair on VV. We find all the Leonard pairs B,BB, B^* on VV that are compatible with A,AA,A^*.For each solution B,BB, B^*, we describe the corresponding companion K=ABK = A-B

    Bounds via spectral radius-preserving row sum expansions

    No full text
    We show a simple method for constructing larger dimension nonnegative matrices with somewhat arbitrary entries which can be irreducible or reducible but preserving the spectral radius via row sum expansions. This yields a sufficient criteria for two square nonnegative matrices of arbitrary dimension to have the same spectral radius, a way to compare spectral radii of two arbitrary square nonnegative matrices, and a way to derive new upper and lower bounds on the spectral radius which give the standard row sum bounds as a special case

    Group inverses of matrices of directed trees

    No full text
    A new class of directed trees is introduced. A formula for the group inverse of the matrices associated with any tree belonging to this class is obtained. This answers affirmatively, a conjecture of Catral et al., for this new class

    Programming Bee-Bots to Draw Geometric Shapes

    No full text
    This article describes an activity that integrates Bee-Bot robots, to engage first-grade students in creating different geometric shapes. In this activity, students work collaboratively to program Bee-Bots to move on a specific path with two markers attached to the Bee-Bots to create a geometric shape on a sheet of paper. After exploring the robots, first-grade students are asked to create geometric shapes such as squares, rectangles, and circles. Students write and test their programs, then observe the drawing to debug their program. This allows students to attend to the number of sides and vertices and the relations among them to complete the task.

    Considering Structure in Online Learning

    No full text
    This week-long, asynchronous online module introduces the theory of transactional distance, particularly the component associated with structure, to graduate-level instructional design students enrolled in a seminar course about online learning. Learners were also introduced to publicly available Quality Matters rubrics and other readings associated with the effective design of online instruction. To demonstrate their understanding of the topic, learners imported skeletal learning resources into a course shell and developed them further in terms of sequence, clarity, organization, and purpose based on assigned readings and discussions. Because dialogue and accessibility concepts were covered more fully in later modules, these topics were minimized during this module. Topics: distance education, online learning, learning management system, course design, structure, clarity, organization. Time:  One week was allocated for this lesson

    A Personalized Learning Choice Board for Blended Learning Teacher Preparation

    No full text
    This unit allows preservice teachers at the end of a one-credit hour, K-12, online and blended teaching course to further explore blended teaching competencies that they feel are weak or are interested in. The unit is meant to be completed independently with weekly asynchronous check-ins to ensure progress. The unit includes a choice board of activities focused on the four different blended teaching competency areas covered in prior units. Students select and complete three activities from the choice board. Each activity provides an opportunity to reflect on the activity and on experiences with personalized learning

    Some additional notes on the spectra of non-negative symmetric 5 x 5 matrices

    No full text
    The Symmetric Non-negative Inverse Eigenvalue Problem (SNIEP) asks when is a list σ=(λ1,λ2,,λn) \sigma = \left( \lambda_{1}, \lambda_{2}, \dots, \lambda_{n} \right) of real, monotonically decreasing numbers, the spectrum of an n×nn \times n, symmetric, non-negative matrix AA. In that case, we say σ\sigma is realizable and AA is a realizing matrix. Here, we consider the case n=5n=5, the lowest value of nn for which the problem is unsolved. Let s1(σ)=i=15λi s_{1}(\sigma) = \sum_{i=1}^5 \lambda_{i} and s3(σ)=i=15λi3 s_{3}(\sigma) = \sum_{i=1}^5 {\lambda_{i}}^3 . It is known that to complete the solution for n=5n=5, it remains to consider the case \lambda_{3} > s_{1}(\sigma), so let y=λ3s1(σ)y=\lambda_{3}- s_{1}(\sigma) and assume y0y \geq 0. We prove that if σ\sigma is realizable, then s3(σ)s1(σ)3+6s1(σ)y(s1(σ)+y)s_{3}(\sigma) \geq s_{1}(\sigma)^3+6s_{1}(\sigma)y(s_{1}(\sigma)+y). This strengthens the inequality s3(σ)s1(σ)3s_{3}(\sigma) \geq s_{1}(\sigma)^3 obtained by Loewy and Spector, which in turn strengthens the inequality 25s3(σ)s1(σ)3 25s_{3}(\sigma) \geq s_{1}(\sigma)^3 , one of the Johnson--Loewy--London inequalities. As an application of the new inequality, we show that certain lists previously unknown as far as their realizability is concerned are not realizable

    Nonsparse companion Hessenberg matrices

    No full text
    In recent years, there has been a growing interest in companion matrices. Sparse companion matrices are well known: every sparse companion matrix is equivalent to a Hessenberg matrix of a particular simple type. Recently, Deaett et al. [Electron. J. Linear Algebra, 35:223--247, 2019] started the systematic study of nonsparse companion matrices. They proved that every nonsparse companion matrix is nonderogatory, although not necessarily equivalent to a Hessenberg matrix. In this paper, the nonsparse companion matrices which are unit Hessenberg are described. In a companion matrix, the variables are the coordinates of the characteristic polynomial with respect to the monomial basis. A PB-companion matrix is a generalization, in the sense that the variables are the coordinates of the characteristic polynomial with respect to a general polynomial basis. The literature provides examples with Newton basis, Chebyshev basis, and other general orthogonal bases. Here, the PB-companion matrices which are unit Hessenberg are also described

    0

    full texts

    3,193

    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    University of Wyoming Open Journals
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Open Research Online? Become a CORE Member to access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard! 👇