Arizona State University Research Data Repository
Not a member yet
    84 research outputs found

    Arizona Death Statistics

    No full text
    Death data includes over 300 fields describing the decedent’s death event. The data set contains all information on the death certificate including demographics, date and time of death, cause and location of death. In addition, information about the decedent’s work, military status, education, and marital status if the decedent was an adult at the time of death. Facility, funeral home, coroner, physician, and other provider information is also included. ASU maintains a five-year rolling data set for deaths. The latest year available is 2023. To request health data: ASU Request Form</p

    Replication Data for: Magnetic-resonance-based measurement of electromagnetic fields and conductivity in vivo using single current administration

    No full text
    Supporting Information for Publication. Dataset contains information necessary to replicate findings

    MMM Aggregate Educator 2018 and 2019 Survey Data

    No full text
    Raw and imputed data from the 2018 and 2019 surveys of educators who use March Mammal Madness with their learners

    Replication Data for: Western Regional Copyright Education Project

    No full text
    The survey was administered using the Qualtrics cloud survey software. Several weeks in late September 2020 were spent collecting information about all known state and regional library email lists in the 13 targeted Western states. In addition, contact information for many individuals was gathered, such as state librarians and library directors. The goal was to reach as many library professionals, from as many kinds of libraries, as possible during our outreach campaign. This contact information was organized into a spreadsheet, broken down by state and with a separate sheet for multi-state organizations and contacts and two graduate students the states between them and sent emails from the project-specific Gmail account. Methods for processing the data: Data were downloaded directly from the Qualtrics cloud survey software as a Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) datafile, in order to preserve value labels. SPSS was then utilized to export these data into a comma delimited file format, whereby the value labels were saved in place of data (numeric) values, where applicable. Instrument- or software-specific information needed to interpret the data: Data analysis from this project was undertaken with the open-source R language and environment, version 4.0.2 (June 2020) and using the open source R Studio IDE, version 1.3.1073-1 (August 11, 2020) Report submitted to IMLS with data analysis is available at ASU Library's KEEP Repository. People involved with sample collection, processing, analysis and/or submission: Rachel Bridgewater, Karen Grondin, Jordan Jedry, Patrick Newell, Jaclyn Noble, Anali Maughan Perry, Max Robinson, and Lori M. Webe

    Hospital Discharge Data

    No full text
    ADHS collects hospital discharge records for inpatient and emergency department visits from all Arizona licensed hospitals. These data include deidentified and identified demographics, facilities, discharge diagnoses, and providers. Hospital discharge data is available in two distinct categories: inpatient and emergency department. Both categories contain approximately 200 fields describing the patient demographics, details about the medical condition, hospital or emergency department stay, discharge status, and charges associated with the stay. There are about 4 times the number of emergency department stays compared to inpatient stays. These data are available as identifiable or as a ‘limited’ data set which doesn’t contain personal identifiers but contains facility and provider information which has not been approved as deidentified. The staff at Research Data Management can provide a completely deidentified data set as well. Data sets are available for 2013-2023. To request health data: ASU Request Form </p

    Replication Data for: Legislative Diversity and the Rise of Women Lobbyists

    No full text
    Despite a growing body of literature examining the consequences of women’s inclusion among lobbyists, our understanding of the factors that lead to women’s initial emergence in the profession is limited. In this study, we propose that gender diversity among legislative targets incentivizes organized interests to hire women lobbyists, and thus helps to explain when and how women emerge as lobbyists. Using a comprehensive data set of registered lobbyist-client pairings from all American states in 1989 and 2011, we find that legislative diversity influences not only the number of lobby contracts held by women but also the number of former women legislators who become revolving-door lobbyists. This second finding further supports the argument that interests capitalize on the personal characteristics of lobbyists, specifically by hiring women to work in more diverse legislatures. Our findings have implications for women and politics, lobbying, and voice and political equality in the United States

    MMM Aggregate Figure Source Data

    No full text
    Source data for figures in 2021 manuscript "March Mammal Madness and the Power of Narrative in Science Outreach.

    Building Resilience in Seattle: An Analysis of City Plans

    No full text
    This report highlights findings from a joint research project between Arizona State University and Texas A&M University funded by the National Science Foundation. The central goal of the Resilience Planning Networks project is to assess the degree of coordination of government agencies and stakeholders engaged in resilience planning and to examine the influence of coordination on the integration of flood mitigation across multiple plans. By combining surveys, social network analysis, and the latest techniques in plan evaluation, this study provides critical and timely information about the government structures and planning processes to address long-term risk of coastal flooding. The study focuses on four different coastal U.S. cities: Boston, Massachusetts; Baltimore, Maryland; Fort Lauderdale, Florida; and Seattle, Washington. This report presents key findings from the plan analysis component of the research project for Seattle. This includes a plan quality evaluation for Seattle's network of plans, a scorecard of policies listed in the plans that would impact physical vulnerability to flooding, and an analysis of how the city’s network of plans is connected. The results reflect the content of existing city plans, and do not capture all ongoing resilience planning efforts in the cities

    Focus group transcripts for Western Regional Copyright Education Project

    No full text
    Combined, anonymized focus group transcripts from eight different focus groups conducted in March 2021 in support of the Western Regional Copyright Education Project. Report submitted to IMLS with data analysis is available at ASU Library's KEEP Repository. People involved with focus group facilitation, transcription, and preparation for submission are: Rachel Bridgewater, Karen Grondin, Jordan Jedry, Patrick Newell, Christopher Mullins, Anali Maughan Perry, and Max Robinson

    Building Resilience in Fort Lauderdale: An Analysis of City Plans

    No full text
    This report highlights findings from a joint research project between Arizona State University and Texas A&M University funded by the National Science Foundation. The central goal of the Resilience Planning Networks project is to assess the degree of coordination of government agencies and stakeholders engaged in resilience planning and to examine the influence of coordination on the integration of flood mitigation across multiple plans. By combining surveys, social network analysis, and the latest techniques in plan evaluation, this study provides critical and timely information about the government structures and planning processes to address long-term risk of coastal flooding. The study focuses on four different coastal U.S. cities: Boston, Massachusetts; Baltimore, Maryland; Fort Lauderdale, Florida; and Seattle, Washington. This report presents key findings from the plan analysis component of the research project for Fort Lauderdale. This includes a plan quality evaluation for Baltimore's network of plans, a scorecard of policies listed in the plans that would impact physical vulnerability to flooding, and an analysis of how the city’s network of plans is connected. The results reflect the content of existing city plans, and do not capture all ongoing resilience planning efforts in the cities

    0

    full texts

    84

    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    Arizona State University Research Data Repository
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Open Research Online? Become a CORE Member to access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard! 👇