E-JOURNALS OF UNIVERSITY SULKHAN-SABA ORBELIANI
Not a member yet
300 research outputs found
Sort by
REORGANIZATION OF THE GEORGIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH IN THE XIX CENTURY
No full textIn this article, his Eminence Melkhisedek Khachidze analyzes the reorganization of the Georgian Orthodox Church by the Russian Empire in the nineteenth century. In 1812, instead of Anton Catholicos (who was exiled to Nizhny Novgorod), Varlam Eristavi was appointed as Exarch of Georgia, who automatically became a member of the Holy Synod of Russia. But The reorganization of the Georgian Church was not limited by this.During this reorganization, in the Georgian Church, established a position of "Blagochin" (Russ. Благочинный). The "Blagochins" had very serious authority inside of Georgian Church. At the same time, the Georgia-Imereti Synod Bureau was established in Georgia. In the beginning, the Bureau operated only under the instructions of the Emperor or the Synod, which were translated in Georgian.The article discusses the main essence of the reorganization of the Georgian Church by the Russian Empire, the dangers that these processes contained and the situation that accompanied the implementation of all this.In this article, his Eminence Melkhisedek Khachidze analyzes the reorganization of the Georgian Orthodox Church by the Russian Empire in the nineteenth century. In 1812, instead of Anton Catholicos (who was exiled to Nizhny Novgorod), Varlam Eristavi was appointed as Exarch of Georgia, who automatically became a member of the Holy Synod of Russia. But The reorganization of the Georgian Church was not limited by this.During this reorganization, in the Georgian Church, established a position of "Blagochin" (Russ. Благочинный). The "Blagochins" had very serious authority inside of Georgian Church. At the same time, the Georgia-Imereti Synod Bureau was established in Georgia. In the beginning, the Bureau operated only under the instructions of the Emperor or the Synod, which were translated in Georgian.The article discusses the main essence of the reorganization of the Georgian Church by the Russian Empire, the dangers that these processes contained and the situation that accompanied the implementation of all this
სტალინის საეკლესიო პოლიტიკა
Get PDFაეკლესიო სტრუქტურა საკმაოდ უცნაურადაა მოწყობილი იმ გაგებით, რომ როდესაც მას სახელმწიფო ღიად ებრძვის, უფრო ვითარდება; აი, დაკნინება და დაცემა მაშინ იწყება, როდესაც სახელმწიფო კონკრეტული პოლიტიკური მიზნების განსახორციელებლად მას მატერიალურ დოვლათს აძლევს, სანაცვლოდ კი თავად განაგებს ეკლესიის მოქმედებებს. სწორედ ეს იყო უმთავრესი დარტყმა, რაც საბჭოთა პოლიტიკამ ეკლესიაზე განახორციელა და რისგანაც დღემდე ვერ გავთავისუფლებულვარ
BOUND TO FAIL: THE RISE AND FALL OF THE LIBERAL INTERNATIONAL ORDER: Translated from the Journal John J. Mearsheimer, Bound to Fail: The Rise and Fall of the Liberal International Order, International Security, Vol. 43, No. 4, 2019, 7-50
No full textIn his article, John Mearsheimer states that the liberal international order that emerged after the end of the Cold War is on the edge of destruction by 2019. According to the author, it was doomed to failure from the beginning. The spread of liberal democracy around the world, which is a necessary precondition for such an order, has met strong resistance due to nationalism, which is oriented on self-determination. For security reasons, some target states opposed US attempts to support liberal democracy. Problems have also been caused by the fact that a liberal order requires states to delegate the substantial power of decision-making to international and supranational institutions. Contemporary nation-states prefer sovereignty and national identity, which is a big puzzle when institutions are strengthened and borders are vulnerable. In addition, hyperglobalization, inseparable from the liberal order, creates economic problems among the lower and middle classes in liberal democracies. Finally, the liberal order accelerated China's rise, which in turn transformed the unipolar system in multipolar one. Liberal international order, according to the author, is possible only in unipolarity. The new multipolar world can be identified by three possible realistic orders: a thin international order that fosters cooperation, and two limited orders: one dominated by China and the other by the United States, which will be balanced by security competition between the two countriesIn his article, John Mearsheimer states that the liberal international order that emerged after the end of the Cold War is on the edge of destruction by 2019. According to the author, it was doomed to failure from the beginning. The spread of liberal democracy around the world, which is a necessary precondition for such an order, has met strong resistance due to nationalism, which is oriented on self-determination. For security reasons, some target states opposed US attempts to support liberal democracy. Problems have also been caused by the fact that a liberal order requires states to delegate the substantial power of decision-making to international and supranational institutions. Contemporary nation-states prefer sovereignty and national identity, which is a big puzzle when institutions are strengthened and borders are vulnerable. In addition, hyperglobalization, inseparable from the liberal order, creates economic problems among the lower and middle classes in liberal democracies. Finally, the liberal order accelerated China's rise, which in turn transformed the unipolar system in multipolar one. Liberal international order, according to the author, is possible only in unipolarity. The new multipolar world can be identified by three possible realistic orders: a thin international order that fosters cooperation, and two limited orders: one dominated by China and the other by the United States, which will be balanced by security competition between the two countrie
DER MENSCH IM RECHT: Der Mensch im Recht -Gustav Radbruch's inaugural lecture 13/11/ 1926 at the University of Heidelberg
No full textDer Mensch im Recht” is an inaugural lecture of Gustav Radbruch, which he gave at University of Heidelberg. He discusses ideas and basic directions of image of human and personality in law and legal history. Georgian article is a translation from German.Der Mensch im Recht” is an inaugural lecture of Gustav Radbruch, which he gave at University of Heidelberg. He discusses ideas and basic directions of image of human and personality in law and legal history. Georgian article is a translation from German
Human Purpose and Natural Law: Lon L. Fuller, Human Purpose and Natural Law, American Journal of Jurisprudence, Vol.3, Issue 1, 1958
No full textCONTRA LEGEM ინტერპრეტაცია: ერთი საინტერესო გადაწყვეტილება ადმინისტრაციული სამართალწარმოების პრაქტიკიდან
No full textPAPAL VISION ON POST-WAR WORLD ORDER – 1942 CHRISTMAS MESSAGE
No full textIn December 24, 1942, Pope Pius XII made his famous Christmas Radio-message in which he talked about the world order in the postwar period. In his message, Holy Father emphasized the importance of internal harmony of the nations and focused on the prerequisites for world peace after the end of the Second World War (1939-1945). His vision was not merely political but covered various juridical and social aspects such as human dignity and rights, social cohesion and protection of family, dignity of work, restoration of juridical order and Christian concept of the state. As a result, the general vision of the Holy See meant that international relations and harmony within the nations are closely interconnected, especially as for peace in worldIn December 24, 1942, Pope Pius XII made his famous Christmas Radio-message in which he talked about the world order in the postwar period. In his message, Holy Father emphasized the importance of internal harmony of the nations and focused on the prerequisites for world peace after the end of the Second World War (1939-1945). His vision was not merely political but covered various juridical and social aspects such as human dignity and rights, social cohesion and protection of family, dignity of work, restoration of juridical order and Christian concept of the state. As a result, the general vision of the Holy See meant that international relations and harmony within the nations are closely interconnected, especially as for peace in worl
ინტოლოგია და ეთიკა
No full textEthics today is preferred not only in secular life but also in ecclesiastical life. It is taught in schools, in the faculties of theology, and, at the same time, in society, it is even equated with dogma (if not more importantly). You can imagine, even in the church it became much more acceptable to deviate from dogma than from moral norms.Interestingly, the term "ethics" was completely unknown in the Orthodox tradition until recent centuries. It is almost never found in ecclesiastical moms, nor was it taught in schools until recent years. This is a term of Western origin that, like other terms, we have inherited in the Church. The tragedy is that due to the conservative nature of our church, we can not follow the current that characterizes the understanding of ethics in the West. This, in turn, continually creates a kind of chasm between the church and society, as society is obliged to support the changes in Auba's ethics that are taking place in Western society.დღეს ეთიკას უპირატესობა ენიჭება არა მარტო საერო ცხოვრებაში, არამედ საეკლესიოშიც. ის ისწავლება სკოლებში, თეოლოგიის ფაკულტეტებზე და, იმავ-დროულად, საზოგადოებაში მას დოგმის თანასწორადაც კი მოიაზრებენ (თუ უფრო მნიშვნელოვნად არა). თქვენ წარმოიდგინეთ, ეკლესიაშიც კი გაცილებით მისაღები გახდა დოგმიდან გადაცდომა, ვიდრე ზნეობრივი ნორმებიდან.
საინტერესოა, რომ მართლმადიდებლურ ტრადიციაში ტერმინი „ეთიკა“ უახლეს საუკუნეებამდე საერთოდ უცნობი იყო. იგი თითქმის არ გვხვდება საეკლესიო მა-მებთან, არც სკოლებში ისწავლებოდა ბოლო წლებამდე. ესაა დასავლური წარ-მოშობის ტერმინი, რომელიც, სხვა ტერმინების მსგავსად, ჩვენ ეკლესიაში დამ-კვიდრდა. ტრაგედია ისაა, რომ ჩვენი ეკლესიის კონსერვატორული ხასიათიდან გამომდინარე, ვერ მივყვებით იმ დინებას, რომელიც დასავლეთში ეთიკის გაგებას ახასიათებს. ეს კი განუწყვეტლივ წარმოშობს ერთგვარ უფსკრულს ეკლესიასა და საზოგადოებას შორის, რადგან საზოგადოება ვალდებულია, მხარი აუბას ეთიკის იმ ცვლილებებს, რომლებიც დასავლეთის საზოგადოებაში ხდება
The Rise and Fall of Judicial Self-Restraint, 100 California Law Review: Translated from the Journal California Law Review 519 (2012)Richard A. Posner, The Rise and Fall of Judicial Self-Restraint, 100
No full textThe following translation is completed according to the publication: Richard A. Posner, “The Rise and Fall of Judicial Self-Restraint”, 100California Law Review 519 (2012).Richard A. Posner is one of the most influential scholars who served as a federal appellate judge on the U.S Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit. This article discusses the origins and characteristics of the doctrine of Judicial Self-Restraint. The author reviews James Bradley Thayer’s constitutional doctrine which argues that judges should overturn a legislative act only when there is no reasonable doubt that it is unconstitutional. According to Posner, Thayer’s doctrine was approved and utilized by great American jurists including Oliver Wendell Holmes, Louis Brandeis, Felix Frankfurter and Alexander Bickel in their judicial and academic writings.
The paper suggests that one of the major reasons for declining the prominence of Judicial SelfRestraint was the development of modern Constitutional Theories (like originalism, textualism, moral interpretations, etc.) stimulated by the conservative backlash against the Warren Court’s Judicial Activism. Subsequently, Judge Posner makes the case for Judicial Pragmatism which emphasizes the significance of consequences over doctrine by offering the eight principles of legal pragmatism. And the author argues that the most highly regarded jurists in American legal history have always been pragmatists.The following translation is completed according to the publication: Richard A. Posner, “The Rise and Fall of Judicial Self-Restraint”, 100California Law Review 519 (2012).Richard A. Posner is one of the most influential scholars who served as a federal appellate judge on the U.S Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit. This article discusses the origins and characteristics of the doctrine of Judicial Self-Restraint. The author reviews James Bradley Thayer’s constitutional doctrine which argues that judges should overturn a legislative act only when there is no reasonable doubt that it is unconstitutional. According to Posner, Thayer’s doctrine was approved and utilized by great American jurists including Oliver Wendell Holmes, Louis Brandeis, Felix Frankfurter and Alexander Bickel in their judicial and academic writings.
The paper suggests that one of the major reasons for declining the prominence of Judicial SelfRestraint was the development of modern Constitutional Theories (like originalism, textualism, moral interpretations, etc.) stimulated by the conservative backlash against the Warren Court’s Judicial Activism. Subsequently, Judge Posner makes the case for Judicial Pragmatism which emphasizes the significance of consequences over doctrine by offering the eight principles of legal pragmatism. And the author argues that the most highly regarded jurists in American legal history have always been pragmatists
გუსტავ რადბრუხი და „სამართლის ფილოსოფიის“ ქართული თარგმანი
Get PDFGustav Radbruch is one of the most extraordinary and popular legal philosophers, who represents German school, but he cannot be named typical German lawyer. His understanding of law and justice inspirited many generations of lawyers in all over the world. Radbruch’s formula played very important role in the development of the legal thought in twentieth century. His “Philosophy of Law” has been translated to Georgian by Giorgi Jimsheladze and published in 2022 (Edited by Giorgi Meskhi). Article overviews Radbruch’s personality and his works, also discusses Georgian translation of the book.Gustav Radbruch is one of the most extraordinary and popular legal philosophers, who represents German school, but he cannot be named typical German lawyer. His understanding of law and justice inspirited many generations of lawyers in all over the world. Radbruch’s formula played very important role in the development of the legal thought in twentieth century. His “Philosophy of Law” has been translated to Georgian by Giorgi Jimsheladze and published in 2022 (Edited by Giorgi Meskhi). Article overviews Radbruch’s personality and his works, also discusses Georgian translation of the book