CESSDA Data Catalogue OAI-PMH Repository
Not a member yet
32838 research outputs found
Sort by
Flash Eurobarometer 538 (The Euro Area, October 2023)
No full textAttitude towards the European Union and the implementation of the Euro as currency. Economic situation.Topics: having the euro is a good thing for the own country and for Europe; changes in feeling European due to the euro; difficulty to distinguish and handle euro bank notes and specific coins; opinion about the number of existing coins and which euro coin denominations should be removed; approval of the abolition of 1- and 2-cent euro coins and to mandatory up- and down-rounding of the final sum of purchase; conversion from the price in euro to the national currency when it comes to exceptional and common purchases; prices increased during the changeover period (only in HR); attitude towards selected statements on the euro: eases travelling, reduces cross-border banking charges, has made it easier to do business in different EU countries, has made it easier to compare prices and shop in different EU countries; preference for more or less co-ordination among euro-area governments; attitude towards the following statements on current reforms: need for significant reforms to improve economy, successful reforms in other euro area countries facilitate reforms in the own country, governments need to save for the ageing populations, retirement age should be increased to ensure sustainability of the pension system; importance of reforms in the own country to help increase growth and employment in the areas: labour market, health system, pension system, social security system, market reforms, taxation, education systems; expectations regarding the inflation rate in the current year; attitude towards the effectiveness of the EU recovery plan to address the damage caused by the coronavirus pandemic and to invest in a green, digital, social and more resilient EU. Demography: age; sex; nationality; travels outside the own country at least once a year; development of household income since last year and expectations for the current year; age at end of education; occupation; professional position; type of community; own a mobile phone and fixed (landline) phone; household composition and household size; region. Additionally coded was: respondent ID; country; type of phone line; nation group; weighting factor.Einstellung zur Europäischen Union und zur Euro-Einführung. Wirtschaftliche Situation.Themen: Euro ist eine gute Sache für das eigene Land sowie für Europa; Veränderung des Identifikationsgefühls als Europäer durch den Euro; Schwierigkeiten mit dem Unterscheiden der Euro-Münzen und -Banknoten; Zufriedenheit mit der Menge der unterschiedlichen Münzarten; Münzen, die abgeschafft werden sollten; Zustimmung zur Abschaffung der 1- und 2-Cent-Münzen und zum obligatorischen Auf- und Abrunden der Endsumme des Kaufs; Umrechnen in die alte nationale Währung bei täglichen oder außergewöhnlichen Einkäufen; Preisanstieg während der Währungsumstellung (nur in HR); Einstellung zu ausgewählten Aussagen zum Euro: kostengünstigeres Reisen, Verringerung grenzüberschreitender Bankgebühren, erleichtert geschäftliche Aktivitäten in verschiedenen EU-Staaten, erleichtert Preisvergleiche und Einkäufe in verschiedenen EU-Staaten; Präferenz für mehr oder weniger Abstimmung zwischen den Regierungen der Eurozone; Einstellung zu den folgenden Aussagen über aktuelle Reformen: Notwendigkeit von Reformen zur Verbesserung der Wirtschaft, erfolgreiche Reformen in anderen Euro-Ländern erleichtern Reformen im eigenen Land, Notwendigkeit des Sparens zur Vorbereitung auf Auswirkungen des demographischen Wandels, Erhöhung des Rentenalters zur Sicherung des Rentensystems; Wichtigkeit von Reformen im eigenen Land zur Förderung von Wachstum und Beschäftigung in den Bereichen: Arbeitsmarkt, Gesundheitssystem, Rentensystem, Sozialversicherung, Marktreformen, Besteuerung, Bildungssystem; erwartete Inflationsentwicklung im laufenden Jahr; Einstellung zum Nutzen des EU-Aufbauplans zur Behebung des durch die Corona-Pandemie verursachten Schadens sowie zur Förderung von Investitionen in eine grüne, digitale, soziale und widerstandsfähigere EU. Demographie: Alter; Geschlecht; Staatsangehörigkeit; mindestens einmal jährlich durchgeführte Reisen außerhalb des eigenen Landes; Entwicklung des Haushaltseinkommens im letzten Jahr sowie Erwartungen für das laufende Jahr; Alter bei Beendigung der Ausbildung; Beruf; berufliche Stellung; Urbanisierungsgrad; Besitz eines Mobiltelefons; Festnetztelefon im Haushalt; Haushaltszusammensetzung und Haushaltsgröße; Region. Zusätzlich verkodet wurde: Befragten-ID; Land; Interviewmodus (Mobiltelefon oder Festnetz); Nationengruppe; Gewichtungsfaktor
GLES Panel 2024, Profile Wave A5
No full textThe German Longitudinal Election Study (GLES) is the central infrastructure project in Germany for the continuous collection and provision of high-quality data for national and international election research. The methodologically diverse surveys of the GLES enable the research of political attitudes and behavior of voters and candidates. Since its foundation, the GLES has been conducted in close cooperation between the German Society for Electoral Research (DGfW) and GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences. Sample A of the GLES Panel consists of quota-based selections of eligible German voters from several non-probability online panels, divided into five subsamples. Participants in the 2017 election campaign surveys were drawn from the main sample A1 (2016), the recontact sample A2 (2013), and the refreshment sample A3 (2017) of the GLES Short-term Campaign Panel 2017. Sample A was further supplemented by refreshment samples A4 for the 2021 election campaign (2020) and A5 for the 2025 election campaign (2024). For the early federal election in 2025, active participants were surveyed up to five times throughout the election campaign and after the federal election. The GLES Panel surveys continue to enable diverse and in-depth analyses of the impact of political events and election campaigns on changes in political attitudes and decision-making processes.The Profile Wave A5 comprises questions on general political and societal attitudes, positions on political and social issues, evaluations of political candidates, parties, and institutions, as well as voting behavior, political knowledge, media usage, personal values, personality traits, and socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents.Die German Longitudinal Election Study (GLES) ist das zentrale Infrastrukturprojekt in Deutschland für die kontinuierliche Erhebung und Bereitstellung von qualitativ hochwertigen Daten für die nationale und internationale Wahlforschung. Die methodisch vielfältigen Umfragen der GLES ermöglichen die Untersuchung der politischen Einstellungen und Verhaltensweisen der Wählerinnen und Wähler sowie der Kandidatinnen und Kandidaten. Die GLES wird seit Bestehen in enger Kooperation zwischen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Wahlforschung (DGfW) und GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften durchgeführt. Stichprobe A des GLES-Panels besteht aus quotenbasierten Auswahlverfahren wahlberechtigter deutscher Bürgerinnen und Bürger aus mehreren nicht-probabilistischen Online-Panels und ist in fünf Teilstichproben unterteilt. Die Stichproben A1-A3 „2017 Election Campaign“ setzt sich aus den Befragten des Wahlkampf-Panels 2017 zusammen. Stichprobe A wurde anschließend durch die Auffrischungsstichprobe A4 für den Bundestagswahlkampf 2021 (2020) sowie A5 für den Bundestagswahlkampf 2025 (2024) ergänzt. Für die vorgezogene Bundestagswahl 2025 wurden aktive Teilnehmende bis zu fünfmal während des Wahlkampfs und nach der Wahl befragt. Die Befragungen im Rahmen des GLES-Panels ermöglichen weiterhin vielfältige und vertiefte Analysen zu den Auswirkungen politischer Ereignisse und Wahlkämpfe auf Veränderungen politischer Einstellungen und Entscheidungsprozesse.Die Profilwelle A5 umfasst Fragen zu allgemeinen politischen und gesellschaftlichen Einstellungen, Positionen zu politischen und gesellschaftlichen Themen, Bewertungen politischer Kandidatinnen und Kandidaten, Parteien und Institutionen sowie zum Wahlverhalten, politischen Wissen, Mediennutzungsverhalten, persönlichen Werten, Persönlichkeitsmerkmalen und soziodemografischen Merkmalen der befragten Personen
Memories of Package Holidays 2024
No full textAineisto koostuu Eviva Espanja! -muistitietokeruun kirjoitusvastauksista. Kirjoituksissa suomalaiset kertovat muistojaan pakettimatkoista. Kirjoituskutsussa vastaajia pyydettiin kertomaan kokemuksia ja muistoja pakettimatkailusta niin vuosikymmenten takaa kuin viime vuosilta. Kirjoituksessa sai keskittyä yhteen matkaan tai kertoa yleisesti omasta pakettimatkailusta. Kirjoittamista helpottamaan annettiin useita erilaisia apukysymyksiä. Taustatietona on mainittu vastaajan sukupuoli, syntymävuosi, ammatti ja paikkakunta, jos hän on antanut niistä tiedon.The data consists of the responses to the Eviva Espanja! memory collection. In the writings, Finns share their memories of package holidays. In the writing invitation, respondents were asked to share their experiences and memories of package holidays, both from decades ago and from recent years. They could focus on a single trip or tell about their own package travel in general. A number of different questions were provided to help with the writing process. Background information includes, if provided, the respondent's gender, year of birth, occupation and place of residence
Vitality 90+ Survey 2018
No full textTervaskannot 90+ on monitieteinen tutkimusprojekti, jossa tarkastellaan kaikkein vanhimpien tamperelaisten asumiseen, avun saamiseen, toimintakykyyn ja arkeen liittyviä asioita. Kotona asuvilta tutkittavilta kysyttiin kenen kanssa he asuvat ja auttaako joku heitä kotona esimerkiksi pukeutumisessa, peseytymisessä ja ruoanlaitossa. Henkilökohtaista avunsaantia selvitettiin tarkemmin kysymällä kuka auttaa eniten kotona jokapäiväisessä elämässä ja käykö kotihoidon työntekijä ainakin kerran viikossa. Lisäksi kysyttiin, mikä olisi vastaajan mielestä nykytilanteessa paras asumismuoto. Kaikkien vastaajien toimintakykyä selvitettiin kysymällä kykenevätkö tutkittavat liikkumaan sisällä, kävelemään 400 metriä, kulkemaan portaissa, pukeutumaan, ja pääsevätkö he vuoteesta. Sairastavuutta selvitettiin kysymällä, onko tutkittavilla lääkärin toteamia sairauksia ja millaiseksi he arvioivat oman terveydentilansa. Lisäksi tietoa kerättiin tutkittavien näkö- ja kuulokyvystä sekä oireista kuten väsymys, huimaus ja kipu. Tutkittavien sosiaalisia suhteita selvitettiin kysymällä tutkittavan siviilisääty ja kartoittamalla koska viimeksi he ovat tavanneet lapsiaan, puhuneet puhelimessa sukulaisten tai ystävän kanssa tai ulkoilleet. Sosioekonomista asemaa selvitettiin kysymällä, missä ammatissa tutkittavat ovat toimineet suurimman osan työikäänsä, ja mikä on heidän korkein suoritettu koulutuksensa. Lopuksi tiedusteltiin vielä, kuinka tyytyväisiä vastaajat ovat elämäänsä, kokevatko he yksinäisyyttä ja onko iäkkäiden ihmisten asema muuttunut tutkittavien lapsuuden ajoista. Koska tutkimukseen osallistumisessa on ollut mahdollista käyttää sijaisvastaajaa, kysyttiin myös, onko tutkittava vastannut kyselyyn itse. Taustamuuttujina aineistossa ovat tutkittavan sukupuoli, siviilisääty ja koulutus.Vitality 90+ is a multidisciplinary research project examining living arrangements, health and functional ability, quality of life, care needs and everyday life of the oldest old individuals in the city of Tampere, Finland. Participants living at home were asked who they live with and whether someone helps them at home with tasks such as dressing, bathing, and cooking. Personal assistance was further investigated by asking who helps the most at home in daily life and whether a home care worker visits at least once a week. Additionally, participants were asked what they consider to be the best form of housing in their current situation. The functional ability of all respondents was assessed by asking if they can move indoors, walk 400 meters, climb stairs, dress themselves, and get in and out of bed. Morbidity was investigated by asking if the participants have any doctor-diagnosed diseases and how they rate their own health. Information was also collected on the participants' vision and hearing abilities, as well as symptoms such as fatigue, dizziness, and pain. The social relationships of the participants were examined by asking about their marital status and mapping out when they last met their children, talked on the phone with relatives or friends, or went outdoors. Socioeconomic status was investigated by asking what occupation the participants held for most of their working life and their highest level of education completed. Finally, participants were asked how satisfied they are with their lives, whether they feel lonely, and if the status of older people has changed since their childhood. Since proxy respondents were allowed in the study, participants were also asked whether they had completed the survey themselves. Background variables in the dataset include the participant's gender, marital status, and education
Politician Panel Survey, November-December 2022
No full textKyselyssä kartoitetaan kunnallispäättäjien mielipiteitä liittyen kunnallispolitiikkaan sekä demokratian toimivuuteen Suomessa. Vastaajat ovat kunnanvaltuutettuja. Aineisto on kerätty osana Päättäjäpaneelia, joka kuuluu kansalliseen yleisen mielipiteen mittaamisen infrastruktuuriin (The Finnish Research Infrastructure for Public Opinion, FIRIPO). Aluksi vastaajille esitettiin yleisiä väittämiä liittyen suomalaiseen demokratiaan ja yhteiskuntaan. Tämän jälkeen vastaajia pyydettiin sijoittamaan itsensä vasemmisto-oikeisto-akselille sekä tiedusteltiin vastaajien näkemyksiä siitä, kuinka paljon tietyillä toimijoilla on päätösvaltaa kunnissa. Seuraavaksi kysyttiin tyytyväisyyttä demokratian toimivuuteen Suomessa ja esitettiin väittämiä liittyen politiikkaan ja yhteiskuntaan. Lopuksi esitettiin väittämiä liittyen kansalaisosallistumiseen sekä kuntien ja asukkaiden väliseen yhteistyöhön. Taustamuuttujina ovat muun muassa puoluejäsenyys, kotikunnan koko luokiteltuna, ikä luokiteltuna, sukupuoli, äidinkieli, koulutustaso sekä vaalipiiri.The questionnaire surveys the opinions of municipal decision-makers on municipal policy and the functioning of democracy in Finland. The respondents are municipal councilors. The data was collected as part of the Politician Panel, which is part of The Finnish Research Infrastructure for Public Opinion (FIRIPO). First, respondents were asked general questions about Finnish democracy and society. Respondents were then asked to place themselves on the left-right axis and were asked about their views on how much power certain actors have in decision-making in municipalities. Next, they were asked about their satisfaction with the functioning of democracy in Finland and asked to respond to statements related to politics and society. Finally, statements were made on civic participation and cooperation between municipalities and residents. Background variables include party membership, size of municipality of residence, age, gender, mother tongue, education level and electoral district
Barometer for Swedish-speaking Finns B11/2022
No full textKyselyn päätavoitteena oli rekrytoida lisää osallistujia suomenruotsalaiseen kansalaispaneeliin. Lisäksi kyselyssä kysyttiin yleisiä poliittisia kysymyksiä. Aineisto on kerätty osana Suomenruotsalaista barometriä (Barometern), joka kuuluu kansalliseen yleisen mielipiteen mittaamisen infrastruktuuriin (The Finnish Research Infrastructure for Public Opinion, FIRIPO). Aluksi vastaajilta tiedusteltiin kykyään vastata kyselytutkimuksiin sekä poliittisiin kysymyksiin osana kyselytutkimuksia. Tämän jälkeen tiedusteltiin minkä puolueen ehdokasta äänestäisi, jos eduskuntavaalit järjestettäisiin nyt sekä tiedusteltiin yleisesti kiinnostuneisuutta politiikkaa kohtaan. Lisäksi kysyttiin luottamuksesta eduskuntaan. Edelleen tiedusteltiin kuinka hyvin ymmärtää uutisissa käsiteltäviä poliittisia kysymyksiä sekä pyydettiin pohtimaan omaa kykyään osallistua yhteiskunnallisiin ja poliittisiin keskusteluihin erilaisista näkökulmista. Lopuksi tiedusteltiin vielä vastaajien mielipiteitä liittyen ajankohtaisiin poliittisiin ehdotuksiin ja asioihin. Taustamuuttujia ovat äidinkieli, sukupuoli, syntymävuosi, koulutusaste, vasemmisto-oikeisto-kanta sekä kotitalouden bruttotulot.The main objective of the survey was to recruit more participants for the Citizen Panel of Swedish-speaking Finns (Barometern). In addition, the survey asked general political questions. The data was collected as part of the Citizen Panel of Swedish-speaking Finns (Barometern), which is part of The Finnish Research Infrastructure for Public Opinion (FIRIPO). First, respondents were asked about their ability to answer survey questions and also political questions as part of surveys. They were then asked which party candidate they would vote for if the parliamentary elections were held now and their general interest in politics was asked. They were also asked about their confidence in the government. Furthermore, they were asked how well they understand the political issues discussed in the news and were asked to reflect on their own ability to participate in social and political debates from different perspectives. Finally, respondents were asked for their opinions on current political proposals and issues. Background variables included mother tongue, gender, year of birth, level of education, left-right affiliation and gross household income
Mapping the Field II – A Survey on the Use of Secondary Data among Social Scientists in Austria (SUF edition)
No full textFull edition for scientific use. The survey study “Mapping the Field II” was conducted in 2024 and 2025 by AUSSDA – The Austrian Social Science Data Archive. The aim of the survey was to provide a detailed insight into the social sciences at Austrian universities and to capture attitudes towards data sharing and data management
Social and Political Attitudes 2024 (Cumulated Data Set)
No full textThe study on social and political attitudes in 2024 was conducted by forsa on behalf of the Federal Government´s Press and Information Office. People aged 14 and over were surveyed in telephone interviews (CATI) on the following topics: assessment of their own financial situation, satisfaction with various areas of life, perception of the Federal Government´s policies and assessment of the global and European political situation. The respondents were selected using a multi-stage random sample.Assessment of own financial situation compared to one year ago; expected own financial situation in one year; currently favorable time for major purchases vs. rather reluctant; development of things in the country in the right vs. wrong direction; perceived political issues of the federal government (open); satisfaction with various areas of life (quality of life in Germany, democracy in Germany, social cohesion in Germany, healthcare in Germany, situation on the labour market in Germany, social security in Germany, dealing with other opinions in Germany, own life overall, own financial situation, status of digitalization in Germany, German education system and public administration); credibility of the information provided by the federal government; assessment of the global and European political situation: concerns about a threat to world peace; global crises that pose the greatest threat to Germany (open); opinion on Germany´s responsibility in view of the current global political situation (Germany should take on more responsibility, take on less responsibility or Germany is already doing enough); opinion on Germany´s role in the European Union (Germany shows too little consideration for other member states, shows too much consideration for other member states or behaves exactly right). Demography: sex; age (categorized); employment; education; net household income; party preference (intention to vote in the federal election); voting behavior in the last federal election; income situation low, medium, high (net equivalent income). Additionally coded were: quarter; region west/east; weighting factor.Die Studie über gesellschaftliche und politische Einstellungen 2024 wurde von forsa im Auftrag des Presse- und Informationsamts der Bundesregierung durchgeführt. Personen ab 14 Jahren wurden in telefonischen Interviews (CATI) zu folgenden Themen befragt: Bewertung der eigenen finanziellen Lage, Zufriedenheit mit verschiedenen Lebensbereichen, Wahrnehmung der Politik der Bundesregierung und Bewertung der welt- bzw. europapolitischen Lage. Die Auswahl der Befragten erfolgte durch eine mehrstufige Zufallsstichprobe unter Einschluss von Festnetz -und Mobilfunknummern (Dual-Frame-Stichprobe).Bewertung der eigenen finanziellen Situation im Vergleich mit der vor einem Jahr; erwartete eigene finanzielle Situation in einem Jahr; aktuell günstiger Zeitpunkt für größere Anschaffungen vs. eher zurückhalten; Entwicklung der Dinge im Land in die richtige vs. falsche Richtung; wahrgenommene politische Themen der Bundesregierung (offen); Zufriedenheit mit verschiedenen Lebensbereichen (Lebensqualität in Deutschland, Demokratie in Deutschland, gesellschaftlicher Zusammenhalt in Deutschland, Gesundheitsversorgung in Deutschland, Lage am Arbeitsmarkt in Deutschland, soziale Absicherung in Deutschland, Umgang mit anderen Meinungen in Deutschland, dem eigenen Leben insgesamt, der eigenen finanziellen Situation, Stand der Digitalisierung in Deutschland, deutsches Bildungssystem und öffentliche Verwaltung); Glaubwürdigkeit der Informationen der Bundesregierung; Bewertung der welt- bzw. europapolitischen Lage: Sorgen hinsichtlich einer Gefährdung des Weltfriedens; weltweite Krisen, von denen die größten Gefahren für Deutschland drohen (offen); Meinung zur Verantwortung Deutschlands angesichts der aktuellen weltpolitischen Lage (Deutschland sollte mehr Verantwortung übernehmen, weniger Verantwortung übernehmen oder Deutschland tut bereits genug); Meinung zur Rolle Deutschlands in der Europäischen Union (Deutschland nimmt zu wenig Rücksicht auf andere Mitgliedsstaaten, nimmt zu viel Rücksicht auf andere Mitgliedsstaaten oder verhält sich genau richtig). Demographie: Geschlecht; Alter (kategorisiert); Erwerbstätigkeit; Bildung; Haushaltsnettoeinkommen; Parteipräferenz (Bundestagswahlabsicht); Wahlverhalten bei der letzten Bundestagswahl; Einkommenslage niedrig, mittel, hoch (Nettoäquivalenzeinkommen). Zusätzlich verkodet wurde: Quartal; Region West/Ost; Gewichtungsfaktor
GESIS Panel.pop Population Sample – Extended Edition
No full textThe GESIS Panel provides a probability-based mixed-mode access panel infrastructure located at GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences in Mannheim, Germany. The project offers the social science community an opportunity to collect survey data from a representative sample of the German population. Submitted study proposals are evaluated based on a scientific review process. Panel members were initially recruited in 2013 in face-to-face interviews followed by a self-administered profile survey. The mode was chosen by the participants. All participants of the profile survey are considered as members of the panel and invited to the bi-monthly regular waves. The starting cohort encompassed 4900 panelists at the beginning of 2014. In order to compensate for panel attrition, a refreshment sample was drawn in 2016, using the General Social Survey (ALLBUS) interview as vehicle. The initial cohort encompasses German speaking respondents aged between 18 and 70 years (at the time of recruitment) and permanently residing in Germany, whereas the second cohort includes respondents from the age of 18 without upper restriction. In 2018 a third recruitment sample was drawn, which was integrated with the wave ge. The third cohort also includes respondents aged 18 and over without an upper limit. Retroactively, cases up to and including wave fc (third wave from 2018) were added to the data. The Data Manual (ZA5664-65_sd_data-manual) has been reissued and there is a corresponding recruitment report (ZA5664-65_mb_recruitment2018). The ALLBUS Sample is based on a disproportional sampling of respondents from the western and eastern part of Germany. A design weight that enables integration of the two recruitment cohorts is included into the dataset. For more details, please see the methods reports of the recruitment processes and die GESIS Panel reference paper (Bosnjak et al., 2017). In March 2020, a special GESIS panel survey was conducted on the SARS-CoV-2 resp. COVID-19 coronavirus outbreak in Germany. In 2021, the fourth recruitment sample was drawn using the German International Social Survey Programme (ISSP), which was integrated with wave ja. The fourth cohort also includes respondents aged 18 and older with no upper limit. For more information, see the corresponding recruitment report (ZA5664-65_r_i12.pdf). In 2023, the fifth recruitment sample was drawn using the German European Social Survey (ESS Round 11), which was integrated with the wave la. The fifth cohort includes respondents aged 18 and over with no upper limit. For more information, see the corresponding recruitment report (ZA5664-65_r_k12.pdf). GESIS Panel Demographic Dataset Starting with version 43-0-0 the longitudinal demographic dataset became part of the dissemination package. The dataset is a longitudinal dataset (long format), with harmonized measurements on demographic variables: Respondent ID; timepoint of survey; corresponding wave; survey year; recruitment cohort; sex of respondent; year of birth; month of birth; highest level of education; personal net income; household net income; marital status; AAPOR disposition code; mode of invitation; mode of participation.The following description of the contents begins with the most recent wave. Part of every survey for all respondents (except in the Recruitment Interview): mode of invitation; mode of participation; date of the beginning an the end of the fieldwork; break during the survey and its duration; date, on wich the questionnaire was completed; estimated duration; mode of participation; place of participation (at home or somewhere else); duration of the questionnaie (online); page history and last completed page (online); time needed to complete each page (online); date of receipt; shape and version of the received questionnaire (offline); AAPOR wave code; disposition code (online); conceptual stimulus of the question (through wave bb); comprehensability of the questions; from on wave ba: difficulties in answering the questions; other people present during the interview; respondents feedback; from on wave aa: JavaScript version; Flash version; Browser information: User Agent String (UAS); from on wave cb: experimental variable: groups; from on wave ec: recruitment cohort and weight; survey evaluation (part of every panel wave): respondents evaluation of the questionnaire. Wave db closes with study zq on survey evaluation, which is a GESIS Panel Longitudinal Core Study and is part of every panel wave. Respondents paradata are documented in a separate csv file (see codebook). Wave mb: GESIS Panel Longitudinal Core Study Module – Environmental attitudes and behavior (zd): Attitudes towards the relationship between humans and the environment (NEP scale: Approaching maximum number of people that can be fed by the earth, right of humans to adapt the environment to their needs, consequences of human intervention in nature, human ingenuity will prevent uninhabitability of the earth, abuse of the environment by humans, sufficient natural resources, equal right to life of plants and animals as humans, Balance of nature stable enough, humans subject to the laws of nature, environmental crisis greatly exaggerated, earth is like a spaceship with limited space and resources, humans destined to rule over nature, delicate balance of nature, humans will be able to control nature, heading for environmental catastrophe); willingness to pay for environmental protection (higher prices, higher taxes, sacrifices in standard of living). Energy transition: Attitude towards the energy transition (renewable energies not sufficient to supply industrialized countries, does more harm than good, move away from fossil fuels as quickly as possible, renewable energies make Germany independent of other countries, large power plants essential for electricity supply, future lies in renewable energies, energy-saving measures are exaggerated, danger from nuclear power plants, energy transition destroys Germany as an industrial location, no alternative to conversion); opinion on the pace of climate protection policy in Germany (moving ahead vs. adapting to other countries); seriousness of the problem of climate change. Mobility and transport: Frequency of use of different means of transport (car, bicycle, bus or train in the region, train on longer journeys). Awareness of sustainable consumption: purchase of organic food and regional food in the last week; purchase of green electricity. GESIS Panel Core Study Module – Personality and personal values (ze): Psychological self-characterization (Big 5: rather reserved, cautious, trusting, lazy, relaxed, little interest in art, sociable, critical, thorough, nervous and insecure, active imagination); personal value preferences (nature conservation, emphasizing one´s own achievements, forming opinions, traditionalism, tolerance, wealth, strong state, acquiring knowledge, helping people, new experiences, giving instructions, obeying laws, caring for the needs of others, freedom of action, desire for recognition of one´s own achievements, justice, exploring things). Conduct of life, alienation, status anxiety (fh): Values (trying different things, enjoying life to the fullest, being successful, living an orderly life, consuming as few resources as possible, living without stress and pressure, living according to one´s innermost feelings); realization of conduct of life in terms of prosperity and success, fun and enjoyable events, inner balance and freedom from stress, consideration for the climate and environment, down-to-earthness and respect for traditional values); general assessment of current life; general assessment of society in Germany; autonomy: control over one´s own life in general; satisfaction (my life is developing in the right direction, our society is developing in the right direction); willingness to change (no desire to change one´s own way of life, would prefer Germany to be the same as it was in childhood); resilience: finding it difficult to deal with major problems in life; fear of social decline (fear of not being able to maintain one´s standard of living in the long term; fear of not being able to maintain one´s social position in the long term)GG; fear of status loss: feeling that one´s own actions are not appreciated by others; feeling that others look down on me, anomie (the situation of ordinary people is not getting better, but worse; politicians are not interested in the problems of ordinary people; most people do not care about what happens to their fellow human beings; when I look at German society, I hardly recognize our country anymore). Conceptions of democracy and democratic design preferences (fm): Vignette experiment on conceptions of democracy (choice between two political democratic systems with regard to the better democracy with different combinations of voting rights (majority voting/proportional representation), legislative initiative (members of parliament/citizens), legislative procedure (direct democracy/parliamentary legislation), system of government (parliamentary system/presidential system), judicial review (judicial review/no judicial review) and constitution (rigid constitution/flexible constitution); Democratic rules and procedures should not be questioned; decision-making procedures Democracy (in case of doubt, more important: fair and democratic decisions vs. decisions that are right in my view); 2025 federal election conducted correctly and fairly by the relevant authorities; opinion on referendums on various issues (restriction of the right to asylum, arms deliveries to Ukraine, relaxation of the debt brake and abolition of same-sex marriage); acceptance of a strong leader who is above the law; party membership or joining a party in recent months. Conspiracy mentality, populist attitudes, and false consensus beliefs (fk); Opinions on various political measures (naturalization of migrants should be made more difficult again in Germany, a general speed limit should be introduced on German highways, fossil fuels should be made more expensive through taxes and levies, same-sex couples should not be allowed to adopt children, the debt brake enshrined in the Basic Law should be relaxed, the fundamental right to asylum should be abolished in order to limit immigration to Germany, German arms deliveries to Ukraine should be stopped, and marriage in Germany should once again only be possible for partnerships between a man and a woman); estimated approval of the respective political measures among the people in Germany (in percent). The stability of gender role attitudes (fj): Agreement with various statements about family and family life (women should care more about their families than their careers, family life suffers when women work full-time, women are naturally more empathetic than men, men should participate in housework as much as women, men and women are equally suited to all professions, men should take greater responsibility for the family´s financial security than women, fathers have to learn how to care for babies, whereas mothers are naturally capable of doing so, it does not matter how couples divide housework and work, as long as they are both satisfied). Wave ma: GESIS Panel Longitudinal Core Study Module – Subjective well-being (e.g.): Life satisfaction (satisfaction with life so far, with current life, satisfaction in one year); importance of various areas of life (own family, work, leisure time, friends, neighborhood, financial situation, health, politics, religion); satisfaction with the aforementioned areas of life; emotional state in the last week (depressed or downcast, stressed, restless sleep, happy, lonely, enjoyed life, sad, listless). GESIS Panel Longitudinal Core Study Module – Social and Political Participation (zc): Interest in politics; political participation (contacted a politician, signed a petition, participated in a demonstration, purchased or boycotted a specific product, participated in a citizens´ initiative, expressed an opinion on political issues, sought information on the internet); intention to vote in the next federal election and voting decision (Sunday question); frequency of consumption of political news; participation in associations, clubs, and organizations in the last 12 months (sports and leisure clubs, church or religious organizations, arts, music, and cultural associations, social movements, political parties, trade unions, youth organizations, charities, parents´ or school associations, others); political effectiveness (politics is too complicated, it is difficult to form an opinion on political issues, politicians are interested in votes and not in people´s opinions, politicians do not care what people think); general trust; trust in public institutions or groups of people (Congress, federal government, political parties, courts, police, politicians, media, European Union, United Nations, Federal Constitutional Court); satisfaction with democracy; left-right self-rating. GESIS Panel Longitudinal Core Study Module – Demography Update (zh): Federal state of current residence, federal state East/West, geographical. Health literacy (ew): Experiment on health literacy: Finding information about therapies (split: treatments), finding out where to get help, understanding what the doctor says, understanding instructions for taking medication, when to seek a second opinion, using information from the doctor, following instructions from the doctor or pharmacist (split: doing what the doctor or pharmacist says), finding support for mental health problems (split: emotional problems), understanding health warnings (split: health advice), importance of preventive medical checkups, evaluating media information on risks, media information as protection against illness, finding information about mental (split: emotional) well-being, understanding advice (split: tips) from family and friends, understanding information on improving health (split: information on how to live healthier), assessing the relationship between habits and health (split: effects of habits on health); Comprehensibility of the previous questions on health; number of sick days in the last 12 months (open-ended); health behavior in the last seven days (frequency of physical activity, eating fruit and vegetables, eating unhealthy foods, smoking, drinking alcohol); planned savings in the next 12 months with regard to: vacation trips, medical check-ups, restaurant visits (including delivery services), professional teeth cleaning, contributions or fees for sports and health services, over-the-counter medicines and health products, fresh fruit and vegetables, tobacco products or e-cigarettes, clothing, and food. Financial literacy: A German short scale (et): Self-assessment of financial knowledge; financial knowledge regarding the following topics: interest calculation, inflation, risk diversification, relationship between bond prices and interest rates, loan interest rates and terms. Democratic decisions (fi): democratic attitudes (a unified government that speaks with one voice or a diverse government that encompasses many voices, a parliament that makes quick and efficient decisions or a parliament that engages in open and conflict-ridden debates, protecting the rights of minorities or the majority always has priority, courts review decisions or the government elected by the people always has the final say, freedom of expression for all or extreme voices can be banned). Conspiracy mentality, populist attitudes, and false consensus beliefs (fk): Personality traits (strong need to belong, want others to accept me, don´t worry if other people are interested in me, indifferent if other people don´t accept me, avoid things that cause people to shun me, prefer to be different from other people, being distinctive is important to me, deliberately do things that set me apart from other people, strong need to be unique); control beliefs (if I work hard, I can achieve what I want, I can usually do what I set out to do, if I want to, I can learn anything, my life is largely determined by others, my plans are often thwarted by fate); conspiracy mentality (most people do not recognize the extent of conspiracies; there are secret organizations with great influence on political decisions; politicians are puppets of the powers behind them; I consider conspiracy theories to be nonsense; there is no reasonable reason to distrust governments, secret services, or the media, politicians talk too much and act too little); populism (ordinary citizens are united by good and honest character, referendums on important political issues, ordinary citizens pull together, the differences between the people and the elite are much greater than the differences within the people, the people should make the most important political decisions, not politicians, politicians in parliament must follow the will of the people, ordinary citizens share the same values and interests, politicians care about what ordinary people think). 2025 federal election (fl): Voting in the 2025 federal election; voting decision (first and second votes) in the 2025 federal election; voting in the 2021 federal election. Wave ld: GESIS Panel Core Study Module – Panel survey participation evaluation and mode preferences (zi): Attitude towards surveys in general (important for society, provide important insights, waste of time, enjoy postal and online questionnaires, invasion of privacy, enjoy being interviewed for surveys, interesting in itself, asked to participate too often, exhausting to answer so many questions); name the three most important reasons for participating in the GESIS GesellschaftsMonitor (open-ended); opinion on participation in the GESIS GesellschaftsMonitor in 2024 (regular discussions with third parties about survey topics, sense of obligation to participate, participation has become a habit, suits me, identification with GESIS GesellschaftsMonitor); overall rating of the GESIS GesellschaftsMonitor surveys in 2024 and school grade; likelihood of recommending participation in the GESIS GesellschaftsMonitor to friends; membership in other online panels; number of memberships in other online panels. Internet access and Internet use: Frequency of use of desktop computer/PC, laptop, tablet PC, and smartphone; participation preferences GESIS GesellschaftsMonitor: probability of participation via paper questionnaire, desktop computer/PC or laptop, tablet PC, and smartphone; preferred mode of participation. GESIS Panel Longitudinal Core Study Module – Demography Update (zh): sex; age (year of birth); German citizenship; foreign citizenship; marital status; permanent partner; shared household with partner; highest general school leaving certificate; type of vocational training qualifications; type of university at which the university degree was obtained; household size; children under 16 in the household; number of children under 16 in the household; own (i.e., biological) or adopted children; number of own or adopted children; month and year of birth of the oldest child; gender of the oldest child; oldest child lives in the household; month and year of birth of youngest child; gender of youngest child; youngest child lives in household; children of partner, stepchildren or foster children in household; number of children of partner, stepchildren or foster children in household; birth month and year of the oldest stepchild; gender of the oldest stepchild; birth month and year of the youngest stepchild; gender of the youngest stepchild; personal net income; household net income. Response quality over time (fa): Experiment on response quality: agreement with various statements on the following topics: adequate housing, trust, responsibility for crime, suitability of women for politics, harshness of courts in dealing with criminals, and government led by intelligent people. Intra-individual development of national pride in Germany during the 2024 UEFA European Football Championship (ek): pride in being German; interest in broadcasts of international soccer matches played by the German men´s national team. Increasing respondents´ survey literacy: A knowledge intervention to detect misleading survey results (eq): Experiment on the trustworthiness and quality of surveys and survey results using the example of a survey on citizens´ insurance (factors: training in evaluating the survey method, misleading statement by a politician about the quality of the survey): trust in the survey; reason for existing or lack of trust in the survey (open). Investigating political participation through the lens of ostracism in the context of the European 2024 election (er): Frequency of experiences of ostracism in the last two months (other people excluded me from conversations, other people treated me as if I were not there, people close to me avoided me because of different political opinions); satisfaction with the government in the last two months (the current German government has ignored the needs of people like me, the current European government (European Commission) has ignored the needs of people like me). False consensus beliefs in politics and perceived legitimacy (ff): Experiment on the legitimacy of political decisions with regard to: relaxing the debt brake, abolishing the fundamental right to asylum, stopping arms deliveries to Ukraine, marriages only between men and women, satisfaction with democracy (different order of satisfaction with democracy and surveys on the topics of Ukraine and marriage or the debt brake and asylum). Financial literacy: A German short scale (et): Self-assessment of financial knowledge; financial knowledge regarding the following topics: intere
Den västsvenska SOM-undersökningens kumulativa dataset 1992-2023
No full textThe SOM survey in West Sweden has been conducted yearly since 1992. The survey was initially limited to residents of Gothenburg and its surrounding municipalities. In 1998, the survey was extended to include the entire Västra Götaland County plus the municipality of Kungsbacka. The purpose of the regional surveys is to enable SOM researchers to study attitudes and behavior linked to local and regional issues. They emphasise public services and media, although many of the questions are identical with those used in National SOM in order to make the answers comparable both between the regions and with Sweden at large. The Super-West SOM contains data from the SOM survey in West Sweden surveys from 1992. The data contains a selection of questions frequently asked over the years, focusing on time series. The purpose of the regional surveys is to enable researchers to study attitudes and behaviour linked to local and regional issues. The dataset has changed somewhat in relation to the codebook, in order to reduce the risk of re-identification. The following changes have been made: Variables removed: ja15a, ja15b, cb15, pinc2011, hinc1990, hinc1993, hinc1999, hinc2008, hinc2011, ankom, komkod2010, kommun, yearofbirthreg, lkf, sdnSOM-institutet vid Göteborgs universitet genomför varje höst sedan 1992 en regional frågeundersökning bland boende i Västra Götalands län samt Kungsbacka - Väst-SOM - i syfte att kartlägga de boende i regionens vanor och attityder på temat samhälle, politik och medier (SOM står för Samhälle Opinion Medier). Sedan 2012 samlas data in via en kombination av postala enkäter och webbenkäter, och varje undersökning genomförs under så identiska förutsättningar som möjligt för att resultaten från de olika åren ska vara jämförbara. Super-Väst-SOM är en sammanslagen superdatamängd bestående av data från de västsvenska SOM-undersökningarna. Detta stora dataset innehåller merparten av frågorna för samtliga år som de ställts sedan undersökningens början 1992. De frågor som inkluderas i superfilen är ett urval av de som ställts varje år i Väst-SOM, med fokus på tidsserier (i regel med fler än fyra mätpunkter). Syftet är att studera och kartlägga vanor och attityder bland boende i Västra Götalands län samt att följa utvecklingen av dessa över tid. Datasetet har förändrats något i förhållande till kodboken, för att minska risken för bakvägsidentifiering. Följande förändringar har gjorts: Borttagna variabler: ja15a, ja15b, cb15, pinc2011, hinc1990, hinc1993, hinc1999, hinc2008, hinc2011, ankom, komkod2010, kommun, yearofbirthreg, lkf, sd