CESSDA Data Catalogue OAI-PMH Repository
Not a member yet
    32838 research outputs found

    Lukiolaisten kielitietoisuus 2023-2024

    No full text
    Aineisto käsittelee suomalaisten lukiolaisten käsityksiä ja asenteita suomen kielen käyttöön sekä kielellisiin ilmiöihin liittyen erilaisissa arkiympäristöissä. Aineisto on kerätty osana Arkisuomien kielitietoisuudet ja muutos -tutkimushanketta. Aluksi esitettiin väittämiä kielelliseen ajatteluun liittyen. Väittämät koskivat muun muassa kielten sekoittamista, tapoja viestiä, kielioppisääntöjen noudattamista sekä omia kielellisiä taitoja. Tämän jälkeen pyydettiin kuvailemaan, mitä ajatuksia puhekieli, englannin kieli Suomessa sekä kielen muuttuminen vastaajissa herättää. Lisäksi pyydettiin listaamaan kielellisiä ilmauksia, joita käyttää viestitellessään, mutta ei puhuessaan. Seuraavaksi esitettiin erilaisia esimerkkisanoja ja pyydettiin arvioimaan, missä määrin käyttää näitä kielenpiirteitä omassa puheessaan ja viestittelyssään. Tämän jälkeen esitettiin murteellisia ilmauksia ja pyydettiin erilaisten adjektiiviparien avulla arvioimaan, millainen mielikuva vastaajilla on näistä ilmauksista. Lopuksi tiedusteltiin vielä avointen vastausten avulla vastaajien ajatuksia kielen käytöstä ja tutkimuksesta. Taustamuuttujia ovat syntymävuosi, sukupuoli, äidinkieli ja lukion sijaintikunta.The data focuses on Finnish upper secondary school students' perceptions and attitudes towards the use of Finnish language and linguistic variation in everyday contexts. The data was collected as part of the research project Societal awareness of linguistic variation and change (LANGAWARE). First, statements were presented relating to language use. The statements concerned, among other things, mixing languages, ways of communicating, following grammar rules, and personal linguistic skills. After this, the respondents were asked to describe their thoughts on colloquial language, the English language use in Finnish, and language change. They were also asked to list linguistic expressions that they use in writing but not in speech. Next, various example words were presented, and respondents were asked to assess the extent to which they use these linguistic expressions in their own speech and communication. After this, dialectal expressions were presented, and respondents were asked to use different pairs of adjectives to assess what kind of image they had of these expressions. Finally, open-ended questions were used to ask respondents for their thoughts on language use and linguistic research. Background variables include year of birth, gender, native language, and municipality of upper secondary school

    Deutschlands bilaterale Partnerschaften im Überblick

    No full text
    Das Forschungsziel des Kapitels „Bilaterale Partnerschaften Deutschlands im Überblick“, das im Anhang der Studie „Verlässliche Partnerschaften in der internationalen Politik – Deutschlands Partner, Partner Deutschland“ (S. 42-59) veröffentlicht wurde, war die Untersuchung der Erfassung und Klassifizierung bilateraler internationaler Partnerschaften auf Bundesebene. Hierzu sollte ein Überblick der zum Zeitpunkt der Recherche bestehenden Partnerschaften anhand öffentlich zugänglicher Daten erstellt werden. Als Ergebnis der Recherche entstand ein tabellarischer Datenkorpus, der einen Eintrag pro identifizierte Partnerschaft umfasst. Zum genauen Verständnis der Daten sollten die Erläuterungen im Methodenbericht herangezogen werden.Das Forschungsziel des Kapitels „Bilaterale Partnerschaften Deutschlands im Überblick“, das im Anhang der Studie „Verlässliche Partnerschaften in der internationalen Politik – Deutschlands Partner, Partner Deutschland“ (S. 42-59) veröffentlicht wurde, war die Untersuchung der Erfassung und Klassifizierung bilateraler internationaler Partnerschaften auf Bundesebene. Hierzu sollte ein Überblick der zum Zeitpunkt der Recherche bestehenden Partnerschaften anhand öffentlich zugänglicher Daten erstellt werden. Als Ergebnis der Recherche entstand ein tabellarischer Datenkorpus, der einen Eintrag pro identifizierte Partnerschaft umfasst. Zum genauen Verständnis der Daten sollten die Erläuterungen im Methodenbericht herangezogen werden

    British Social Attitudes Survey, 2024

    No full text
    Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.BackgroundThe&nbsp;British Social Attitudes (BSA) survey series began in 1983. The series is designed to produce annual measures of attitudinal movements to complement large-scale government surveys that deal largely with facts and behaviour patterns, and&nbsp;the data on party political attitudes produced by opinion polls. One of the BSA's main purposes is to allow the monitoring of patterns of continuity and change, and the examination of the relative rates at which attitudes, in respect of a range of social issues, change over time. Some questions are asked regularly, others less often. Funding for BSA comes from a number of sources (including government departments, the Economic and Social Research Council and other research foundations), but the final responsibility for the coverage and wording of the annual questionnaires rests with NatCen Social Research (formerly Social and Community Planning Research). The BSA has been conducted every year since 1983, except in 1988 and 1992 when core funding was devoted to the British Election Study (BES).Further information about the series and links to publications may be found on the NatCen Social Research British Social Attitudes webpage.Main Topics:Each year, the BSA interview questionnaire contains a number of 'core' questions, which are repeated in most years. In addition, a wide range of background and classificatory questions is included. The remainder of the questionnaire is devoted to a series of questions (modules) on a range of social, economic, political and moral issues - some are asked regularly, others less often. Cross-indexes of those questions asked more than once appear in the reports.In 2024 the questionnaire included the following topics: Household Composition; Employment; Tenure; Internet Usage; Politics; Monarchy; Funding of Social Care; Satisfaction with NHS; NHS Priorities &amp; Principles; Pensions &amp; Retirement; Attitudes to Private/State Schools; Zero Hours Contracts &amp; Employment Rights; Taxes &amp; Government Spending; Assisted Dying; Tobacco &amp; Cannabis; Poverty, Inequality &amp; Cost of Living; European Union; Immigration; Foreign Policy &amp; Defence; Climate Change &amp; Housing; Prejudice &amp; Inequalities; Voting &amp; Political System; General Election Vote; National Identity &amp; Ethnicity; Religion; Disability; Education; Benefits &amp; Income.</p

    Living Costs and Food Survey, 2023-2024

    No full text
    Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.Background: A household food consumption and expenditure survey has been conducted each year in Great Britain (excluding Northern Ireland) since 1940. At that time the National Food Survey (NFS) covered a sample drawn solely from urban working-class households, but this was extended to a fully demographically representative sample in 1950. From 1957 onwards the Family Expenditure Survey (FES) provided information on all household expenditure patterns including food expenditure, with the NFS providing more detailed information on food consumption and expenditure. The NFS was extended to cover Northern Ireland from 1996 onwards. In April 2001 these surveys were combined to form the Expenditure and Food Survey (EFS), which completely replaced both series. From January 2008, the EFS became known as the Living Costs and Food (LCF) module of the Integrated Household Survey (IHS). As a consequence of this change, the questionnaire was altered to accommodate the insertion of a core set of questions, common to all of the separate modules which together comprised the IHS. Some of these core questions are simply questions which were previously asked in the same or a similar format on all of the IHS component surveys. For further information on the LCF questionnaire, see Volume A of the LCF 2008 User Guide, held with SN 6385. Further information about the LCF, including links to published reports based on the survey, may be found by searching for 'Living Costs and Food Survey' on the ONS website. Further information on the NFS and Living Costs and Food Module of the IHS can be found by searching for 'Family Food' on the GOV.UK website. History: The LCF (then EFS) was the result of more than two years' development work to bring together the FES and NFS; both survey series were well-established and important sources of information for government and the wider community, and had charted changes and patterns in spending and food consumption since the 1950s. Whilst the NFS and FES series are now finished, users should note that previous data from both series are still available from the UK Data Archive, under GNs 33071 (NFS) and 33057 (FES). Purpose of the LCF The Office for National Statistics (ONS) has overall project management and financial responsibility for the LCF, while the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) sponsors the food data element. As with the FES and NFS, the LCF continues to be primarily used to provide information for the Retail Prices Index, National Accounts estimates of household expenditure, analysis of the effect of taxes and benefits, and trends in nutrition. The results are multi-purpose, however, providing an invaluable supply of economic and social data. The merger of the two surveys also brings benefits for users, as a single survey on food expenditure removes the difficulties of reconciling data from two sources. Design and methodology The design of the LCF is based on the old FES, although the use of new processing software by the data creators has resulted in a dataset which differs from the previous structure. The most significant change in terms of reporting expenditure, however, is the introduction of the European Standard Classification of Individual Consumption by Purpose (COICOP), in place of the codes previously used. An additional level of hierarchy has been developed to improve the mapping to the previous codes. The LCF was conducted on a financial year basis from 2001, then moved to a calendar year basis from January 2006 (to complement the IHS) until 2015-16, when the financial year survey was reinstated at the request of users. Therefore, whilst SN 5688 covers April 2005 - March 2006, SN 5986 covers January-December 2006. Subsequent years cover January-December until 2014. SN 8210 returns to the financial year survey and currently covers April 2015 - March 2016. Northern Ireland sample Users should note that, due to funding constraints, from January 2010 the Northern Ireland (NI) sample used for the LCF was reduced to a sample proportionate to the NI population relative to the UK. Family Food database: 'Family Food' is an annual publication which provides detailed statistical information on purchased quantities, expenditure and nutrient intakes derived from both household and eating out food and drink. Data is collected for a sample of households in the United Kingdom using self-reported diaries of all purchases, including food eaten out, over a two week period. Where possible quantities are recorded in the diaries but otherwise estimated. Energy and nutrient intakes are calculated using standard nutrient composition data for each of some 500 types of food. Current estimates are based on data collected in the Family Food Module of the LCFS. Further information about the LCF food databases can be found on the GOV.UK Family Food Statistics web pages. Secure Access version A Secure Access version of the LCF from 2006 onwards is available from the UK Data Archive under SN 7047, subject to stringent access conditions. The Secure Access version includes variables that are not included in the standard End User Licence (EUL) version, including geographical variables with detail below Government Office Region, to postcode level; urban/rural area indicators; other sensitive variables; raw diary information files (derived variables are available in the EUL) and the family expenditure codes files. Users are strongly advised to check whether the EUL version is sufficient for their needs before considering an application for the Secure Access version.Occupation data for 2021 and 2022 data filesThe ONS have identified an issue with the collection of some occupational data in 2021 and 2022 data files in a number of their surveys. While they estimate any impacts will be small overall, this will affect the accuracy of the breakdowns of some detailed (four-digit Standard Occupational Classification (SOC)) occupations, and data derived from them. None of ONS' headline statistics, other than those directly sourced from occupational data, are affected and you can continue to rely on their accuracy. For further information on this issue, please see: https://www.ons.gov.uk/news/statementsandletters/occupationaldatainonssurveys. Main Topics:Household questionnaire: The first part of the LCF questionnaire collects information about households; the majority of the questions are asked at a household-level, with the household reference person typically responding on behalf of the household as a whole. The household questionnaire includes questions on a range of subjects including family relationships, ethnicity, employment details and the ownership of household durables. It is also the source of all expenditure information not recorded in the LCF diary; principally that which concerns regular payments typically made by all households and large, infrequently purchased items such as vehicles, package holidays and home improvements. Individual questionnaire: The income questionnaire follows on immediately from the household questionnaire and collects the key person-level variables used on the survey. The principal components of the LCF income questionnaire are the sections covering income from employment, benefits and assets. These together form an overview of the total income received by each household, as well as each household member individually. LCF Diary: In addition to the two questionnaires, each individual aged 16 years and over in the household is asked to keep diary records of daily expenditure for two weeks. The EUL version includes only derived variables from the expenditure diary

    Replication data and code: The Influence of Response Scale Labels on the Assessment of Self-rated Health

    No full text
    The data provided contains the dataset and the analysis code that was used for the paper "The Influence of Response Scale Labels on the Assessment of Self-rated Health". In this study, we compare four German-language five-point scale versions of self-rated health that vary in response scale labeling using web probing. Combining qualitative and quantitative methods, we assess how response scale labels affect response distributions of the self-rated health item and which health factors respondents consider when answering questions about their health. The data provided here contains only the closed-ended and coded items while the verbal responses to the open-ended probe were removed.The data provided contains the dataset and the analysis code that was used for the paper "The Influence of Response Scale Labels on the Assessment of Self-rated Health". In this study, we compare four German-language five-point scale versions of self-rated health that vary in response scale labeling using web probing. Combining qualitative and quantitative methods, we assess how response scale labels affect response distributions of the self-rated health item and which health factors respondents consider when answering questions about their health. The data provided here contains only the closed-ended and coded items while the verbal responses to the open-ended probe were removed

    Global Challenges (March / April 2025)

    No full text
    The study on global challenges was conducted by dimap on behalf of the Press and Information Office of the Federal Government. During the survey period from March 24, 2025, to April 5, 2025, the population aged 16 and older in Germany was interviewed by telephone (CATI) on the following topics: Germany´s role in the world, Germany´s relationship with various countries, and attitudes toward current challenges in foreign and defense policy, such as the war in Ukraine, the Middle East conflict, the situation in Syria, NATO and defense spending, and the importance of development policy. Respondents were selected using a multi-stage random sample that included landline and mobile phone numbers (dual-frame sample).1. Germany´s role in the world: interest in foreign policy; opinion on Germany´s influence in the world (too great, too small, or just right); opinion on Germany´s conduct in asserting its interests vis-à-vis other countries (too strong, too weak, or just right); area most in need of urgent solutions (refugees and causes of flight, climate change, global economy and free trade, combating terrorism, peacekeeping and avoidance of military conflicts); other important areas in urgent need of solutions. 2. Germany´s relationship with various countries: Assessment of relations between Germany and the following countries: Great Britain, France, the USA, Russia, China, Turkey, and Israel; assessment of the major powers USA, Russia, and China based on pairs of opposites (trustworthy vs. untrustworthy, economically strong vs. economically weak, militarily strong or militarily weak, threatening vs. non-threatening); USA is a reliable partner with regard to Germany´s security; Germany´s excessive economic dependence on the United States, Russia, China; extent of concern about various foreign policy measures already decided or possible after Donald Trump´s inauguration (significant increase in import tariffs, United States withdrawal from the international climate agreement, possible territorial claims by the United States (in Greenland or the Panama Canal), consideration of the United States´ withdrawal from NATO, end of the United States´ military support for Ukraine, reduction of the United States´ international development aid). 3. Current challenges in foreign and defense policy: Germany´s preferred course of action with regard to Syria following the fall of Bashar al-Assad (lifting sanctions against Syria, providing funds for the reconstruction of the country, returning refugees from Syria to their homeland); the federal government should advocate more strongly for the interests of Israel, more strongly for the interests of the Palestinian civilian population, equally strongly for both, or for neither; confidence in NATO´s deterrent potential against military aggressors; support for a separate European defense alliance; opinion on the NATO Mutual Defense Treaty; opinion on the nuclear umbrella (Germany should rely on deterrence by American nuclear weapons in the future, seek deterrence with nuclear weapons from France, develop its own nuclear weapons, or deterrence with nuclear weapons is generally unnecessary); Federal Armed Forces as part of NATO is rather well or rather poorly positioned in the event of defense; opinion on future spending on the Federal Armed Forces and defense; opinion on the amendment to the Basic Law so that defense spending is no longer limited by the debt brake; support for the reintroduction of compulsory military service; opinion on the introduction of general compulsory service in the Federal Armed Forces or in the social sector; agreement with statements about service in the German Armed Forces (the service of soldiers in the Federal Armed Forces is important for Germany´s security, members of the Federal Armed Forces enjoy high esteem in society, the profession of soldier in the Federal Armed Forces is often viewed critically); opinion on an annual National Veterans Day in Germany; Germany should take on more responsibility in international conflicts (split: because of its Nazi past) vs. remain more reserved and not interfere; there is currently too much, too little, or just the right amount of discussion about Germany´s Nazi past in the political debate; Importance of development policy: Overall, Germany does too much, too little, or just the right amount to support developing countries; following the sharp cuts in development aid by the United States, Germany should spend more on development aid, spend less, or spend the same amount as before. Demography: sex; age, federal state; Berlin West/East; size of town; highest level of education; party preference. Additionally coded: current respondent number; weighting factor.Die Studie zu globalen Herausforderungen wurde von dimap im Auftrag des Presse- und Informationsamts der Bundesregierung durchgeführt. Im Erhebungszeitraum 24. März 2025 bis 05. April 2025 wurde die Bevölkerung ab 16 Jahren in Deutschland in telefonischen Interviews (CATI) zu folgenden Themen befragt: Deutschlands Rolle in der Welt, Deutschlands Verhältnis zu verschiedenen Staaten und Haltung zu aktuellen Herausforderungen in der Außen- und Verteidigungspolitik wie Krieg in der Ukraine, Nahost-Konflikt, Lage in Syrien, NATO und Verteidigungsausgaben, Bedeutung der Entwicklungspolitik. Die Auswahl der Befragten erfolgte durch eine mehrstufige Zufallsstichprobe unter Einschluss von Festnetz -und Mobilfunknummern (Dual-Frame-Stichprobe).1. Deutschlands Rolle in der Welt: Interesse für Außenpolitik; Meinung zum Einfluss Deutschlands in der Welt (eher zu groß, eher zu klein oder gerade richtig); Meinung zum Auftreten Deutschlands bei der Durchsetzung seiner Interessen gegenüber anderen Staaten (zu stark, zu schwach oder genau richtig); Bereich mit dem dringendsten Lösungsbedarf (Flüchtlinge und Fluchtursachen, Klimawandel, Weltwirtschaft und freier Handel, Terrorismusbekämpfung, Friedenssicherung und Vermeidung militärischer Auseinandersetzungen); weiterer wichtiger Bereich mit dringendem Lösungsbedarf. 2. Deutschlands Verhältnis zu verschiedenen Staaten: Beurteilung der Beziehungen zwischen Deutschland und den folgenden Ländern: Großbritannien, Frankreich, USA, Russland, China, Türkei und Israel; Beurteilung der Großmächte USA, Russlands und China anhand von Gegensatzpaaren (vertrauenswürdig vs. nicht vertrauenswürdig, wirtschaftlich stark vs. wirtschaftlich schwach, militärisch stark oder militärisch schwach, bedrohlich vs. nicht bedrohlich); USA ist ein verlässlicher Partner in Bezug auf die Sicherheit Deutschlands; zu starke wirtschaftliche Abhängigkeit Deutschlands von den USA, Russland, China; Ausmaß der Besorgnis über verschiedene bereits beschlossenen oder mögliche außenpolitische Maßnahmen der USA nach der Amtseinführung von Donald Trump (deutliche Anhebung der Importzölle, Austritt der USA aus dem internationalen Klimaabkommen, mögliche Gebietsansprüche der USA (in Grönland oder beim Panamakanal), Austrittsüberlegungen der USA aus der NATO, Ende militärischen Unterstützung der USA für die Ukraine, Reduzierung internationaler Entwicklungshilfe der USA). 3. Aktuelle Herausforderungen in der Außen- und Verteidigungspolitik: präferiertes Vorgehen Deutschlands mit Blick auf Syrien nach dem Sturz des Machthabers Baschar-al-Assad (Sanktionen gegen Syrien aufheben, Geld zur Wiederaufbau des Landes zur Verfügung stellen, Flüchtlinge aus Syrien dorthin zurückschicken); Bundesregierung sollte sich stärker für die Interessen Israels einsetzen, stärker für die Interessen der palästinensischen Zivilbevölkerung, für beide gleich stark oder für keinen von beiden; Zuversicht über das Abschreckungspotential der NATO gegenüber militärischen Aggressoren; Befürwortung eines eigenen Verteidigungsbündnisse der Europäer; Meinung zum NATO-Beistandspakt; Meinung zum nuklearen Schirm (Deutschland sollte sich auf zukünftig auf die Abschreckung durch amerikanische Atomwaffen verlassen, sich um die Abschreckung mit Atomwaffen durch Frankreich bemühen, eigene Nuklearwaffen entwickeln oder eine Abschreckung mit Atomwaffen ist generell nicht nötig; Bundeswehr als Teil der NATO im Verteidigungsfall eher gut oder eher schlecht aufgestellt; Meinung zu den zukünftigen Ausgaben für Bundeswehr und Verteidigung; Meinung zur Grundgesetzänderung dass Verteidigungsausgaben nicht mehr durch die Schuldenbremse begrenzt werden; Befürwortung der Wiedereinführung der Wehrpflicht; Meinung zur Einführung einer allgemeinen Dienstpflicht bei der Bundeswehr oder im sozialen Bereich; Zustimmung zu Aussagen zum Dienst bei der Bundeswehr (der Dienst von Soldatinnen und Soldaten der Bundeswehr ist wichtig für die Sicherheit Deutschlands, Angehörige der Bundeswehr genießen in der Gesellschaft hohes Ansehen, der Beruf Soldatin oder Soldat bei der Bundeswehr wird oft kritisch gesehen); Meinung zu einem jährlich stattfindenden Nationalen Veteranentag in Deutschland; Deutschland sollte bei internationalen Konflikten (Split: wegen seiner nationalsozialistischen Vergangenheit) mehr Verantwortung übernehmen vs. sich eher zurückhalten und nicht einmischen; in der politischen Debatte wird aktuell zu viel, zu wenig oder gerade richtig über die nationalsozialistische Vergangenheit Deutschlands gesprochen; Bedeutung der Entwicklungspolitik: Deutschlands tut bei der Unterstützung von Entwicklungsländern alles in Allem zu viel, zu wenig oder ist gerade richtig so; nach den starken Kürzungen der Entwicklungshilfe durch die USA sollte Deutschland mehr für Entwicklungshilfe ausgeben, weniger ausgeben oder genauso viel ausgeben wie bisher. Demographie: Geschlecht; Alter, Bundesland; Berlin West/Ost; Ortsgröße; höchster Bildungsabschluss; Parteipräferenz. Zusätzlich verkodet wurde: laufende Befragtennummer; Gewichtungsfaktor

    Experiences of Life with Adult Incontinence Pads 2020-2021

    No full text
    Aineisto koostuu kirjoituksista, joissa vastaajat kertovat inkontinenssisuojien eli aikuisvaippojen käyttöön liittyvistä kokemuksistaan. Vastaajien kokemukset inkontinenssisuojien käytöstä liittyvät joko omaan käyttöön tai toisten avustamiseen. Kirjoituskutsussa vastaajia pyydettiin kirjoittamaan aikuisvaippojen käyttöön liittyvistä kokemuksistaan omaelämänkerrallisen tarinan tai tarinoita. Elämästään aikuisvaippojen kanssa sai kirjoittaa juuri sellaisen tarinan ja siitä näkökulmasta kuin itse halusi. Vastaaja sai kirjoittaa kertomuksen yhdestä tapahtumasta, yhdestä päivästä, tai kuvailla pidempää ajanjaksoa. Vastaajille annettiin kirjoituskutsussa useampia kirjoittamista helpottavia apukysymyksiä. Apukysymyksissä kysyttiin muun muassa aikuisvaippojen käyttöön liittyvistä haasteista, sekä siitä, millaisia innovatiivisia ratkaisuja vastaaja on mahdollisesti kehittänyt, jotta arki vaippojen kanssa olisi sujuvampaa. Lisäksi apukysymyksissä kysyttiin esimerkiksi aikuisvaippojen käytön mahdollisista vaikutuksista työelämään, harrastuksiin, ihmissuhteisiin tai esimerkiksi henkilökohtaiseen talouteen. Kysyttiin myös sitä, onko vastaaja mielestään saanut riittävästi tukea ja tietoa inkontinenssin hallinnasta, ja siihen liittyvistä hoitomuodoista. Taustatietona kysyttiin mm. ikää, sukupuolta.The data consists of writings in which respondents describe their experiences of using incontinence guards, or adult incontinence pads. Respondents' experiences of using incontinence guards relate either to their own use or to helping others. In the writing call respondents were asked to write an autobiographical story or stories about their experiences of using adult incontinenc pads. The respondents were asked to write a story about their life with adult pads from the perspective they wanted. Respondents could write a story about one event, one day, or describe a longer period of time. Respondents were given a number of help questions to facilitate their writing. These included questions about the challenges of using adult incontinence pads and any innovative solutions the respondent may have developed to make everyday life with pads smoother. In addition, the help questions asked about the possible impact of adult incontinence pad use on work, hobbies, relationships or personal finances, for example. It was also asked whether the respondents felt they had received enough support and information about incontinence management and related treatments. The background information asked included age, gender. The data were organised into an easy to use HTML version at FSD

    EMM Research Hub Austria (quantitative) (SUF edition)

    No full text
    The EMM Research Hub Austria is a metadata study that systematically compiles empirical research on migrants and ethnic minorities in Austria conducted between 2003 and 2025. Its data structure follows the model of the international EMM Survey Registry and includes both qualitative and quantitative studies, with the present dataset focusing exclusively on quantitative research. This dataset provides, on the one hand, an in-depth overview of the structure and development of the Austrian research landscape on migration and ethnic minorities, and, on the other hand, enables users to identify and explore individual studies

    Consumentenconjunctuuronderzoek - CCO 2024

    No full text
    Doel: Het verschaffen van actuele informatie over consumentenopvattingen met betrekking tot de algemene economische ontwikkeling en de financiële situatie van het eigen huishouden. Met behulp van het onderzoek wordt inzicht verkregen in de opvattingen van consumenten, onder meer ten aanzien van de aankoop van duurzame consumptiegoederen. Tevens worden veranderingen in optimisme of pessimisme op korte termijn gesignaleerd, waarmee vroegtijdig een indicatie van een mogelijke trendwijziging van de particuliere consumptie beschikbaar is. Soort onderzoek: De steekproefeenheid van het CCO is het particuliere huishouden en de steekproefeenheden worden getrokken op basis van een een aselecte tweetrapssteekproef. In de eerste trap wordt een steekproef van gemeenten getrokken en in de tweede trap een steekproef van adressen. Doelpopulatie: Nederlandse consumenten. Waarnemingsmethode: De verzameling van de gegevens vond in de periode 1972–1983 plaats aan de hand van een gestructureerde vragenlijst, waarmee door enquêtrices mondelinge interviews werden afgenomen bij Nederlandse particuliere huishoudens. Van het huishouden werd het hoofd of zijn/haar echtgeno(o)t(e)/vaste partner ondervraagd. Behalve in het eerste jaar, waarin alleen in de maanden mei en oktober werd geënquêteerd, werd het onderzoek steeds driemaal per jaar uitgevoerd, in de maanden januari, mei en oktober. Met ingang van januari 1984 heeft de dataverzameling van het CCO telefonisch plaatsgevonden. Naast de methode van waarneming veranderde in die maand ook de onderzoeksfrequentie. Deze werd verhoogd van drie- tot viermaal per jaar, met als enquêteperiodes de maanden januari, april, juli en oktober. In april 1986 werd de frequentie opnieuw verhoogd. Het onderzoek wordt sinds die datum maandelijks gehouden. Berichtgevers: Van het huishouden wordt het hoofd van het huishouden of zijn/haar echtgeno(o)t(e)/vaste partner ondervraagd. Steekproefomvang: De steekproefomvang bedraagt ruim 1600 huishoudens. Controle- en correctiemethoden: Er wordt gecontroleerd op interne consistentie waarbij gekeken wordt naar de achtergrondkenmerken van de respondenten en de plausibiliteit van de uitkomsten met voorgaande perioden. De conjunctuuronderzoeken bij Nederlandse consumenten, waarmee het CBS in 1972 is gestart, worden mede op verzoek van de Europese Commissie uitgevoerd. --------- Dit betreft een beveiligd microbestand van het Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek-CBS. Beveiligde micro-bestanden zijn bestanden die zodanig bewerkt zijn dat herkenning van individuen en huishoudens uitgesloten is

    The Intellectual Disability Supplement to the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (IDS-TILDA) Wave 2, loneliness consequences supporting data, 2014

    No full text
    The Intellectual Disability Supplement to the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (IDS-TILDA) is a longitudinal study researching ageing in Ireland among people with an intellectual disability aged 40 and over. This study is the first of its kind in Europe, and the only study able to directly compare the ageing of people with an intellectual disability with the general ageing population. The underpinning values of IDS-TILDA are inclusion, choice, empowerment, person centred, the promotion of people with intellectual disability, the promotion of best practice and to contribute to the lives of people with intellectual disability. The objectives of IDS-TILDA are: to understand the health characteristics of people ageing with an intellectual disability; to examine the service needs and health service utilization of people ageing with an intellectual disability; to identify disparities in the health status of adults with an intellectual disability as compared to The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing’s (TILDA) findings for the general population; and to support evidence-informed policies, practices and evaluation. This research looks at the consequences of loneliness in terms of physical and psychological reactions and coping mechanisms through the five pathway social-environmental model to investigate the consequences of loneliness. The article sought to answer the questions: how do older people with an ID physically react to loneliness?; and do lonely people with an ID demonstrate the use of specific coping mechanisms? In adherence with the principals of open science (Health Research Board 2021, Trinity College Dublin, 2020) this data has been deposited to support the submission of a paper deposited with the HRB on 16th October 2021 titled “An exploration of the consequences of, and coping with loneliness in an ageing intellectual disability population” by Dr Andrew Wormald, Professor Mary McCarron and Professor Philip McCallion. This data is extracted from the second wave of the IDS-TILDA study and utilises variables from different sections of the dataset. The data has been anonymized to prevent reverse engineering of the data and the information has been combined so that in cross tabulations of the data no less than 20 participants appear in any cell

    0

    full texts

    32,838

    metadata records
    Updated in last 30 days.
    CESSDA Data Catalogue OAI-PMH Repository
    Access Repository Dashboard
    Do you manage Open Research Online? Become a CORE Member to access insider analytics, issue reports and manage access to outputs from your repository in the CORE Repository Dashboard! 👇