Journal Service - Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
Not a member yet
1022 research outputs found
Sort by
Stephen Amico, Roll Over, Tchaikovsky! Russian Popular Music and Post-Soviet Homosexuality (2014)
no abstract
---
JSTOR link to article (restricted access) https://www.jstor.org/stable/4465115
Tell the Truth!: Blues and Gospel by Richard Williams. Produced by the State Library and Archives of Florida (2016)
no abstract
---
JSTOR link to article (restricted access) https://www.jstor.org/stable/4465116
Who’s Got the Map? Scholarship, Journalism and Essentialism in Writing on South African Jazz
no abstract
---
JSTOR link to article (restricted access) https://www.jstor.org/stable/4465115
Jared Mackley-Crump, The Pacific Festivals of Aotearora New Zealand: Negotiating Place and Identity in a New Homeland (2015)
no abstract
---
JSTOR link to article (restricted access) https://www.jstor.org/stable/4465115
The Meeting of Knowledges as a Contribution to Ethnomusicology and Music Education
no abstract
---
JSTOR link to article (restricted access) https://www.jstor.org/stable/4465269
Native North America (Vol. 1): Aboriginal Folk, Rock, and Coutnry 1966-1985. Various Artists. Produced and compiled by Kevin Howes, Light in the Attic Records, Seattle (2015)
no abstract
---
JSTOR link to article (restricted access) https://www.jstor.org/stable/4465271
Soft Authority against Hard Cases of Racially Discriminating Speech: Why the CERD Committee Needs a Margin of Appreciation Doctrine
This article argues that the Committee for the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD Committee), as it exercises quasi-judicial authority, should consider applying standards of reasoning similar to those of international courts. In particular, with respect to racially discriminating speech, the legitimacy of the CERD Committee’s Communications would benefit from a margin of appreciation doctrine that leaves domestic authorities greater leeway in finding their strategy to counter the threat of anti-migrant popular sentiment and gives recognition to alternative approaches beyond criminal persecution. This allows a context sensitive approach that might do justice to both the freedom of expression and the need for a more effective protection against racially discriminating speech
Law as an Antidote? Assessing the Potential of International Health Law Based on the Ebola-Outbreak 2014
The Ebola-Outbreak of 2014 has put international health law in the limelight. This contribution assesses the measures taken by the international community with regard to the outbreak of 2014 with a special focus on the World Health Organization and the UN Security Council. International law provides different actors with means to cooperate in order to fight the outbreak. The list of actors does not include the UN Security Council, which has addressed the outbreak in one resolution under chapter VII without taking any effective legal remedies. In addition, the relevant human right to health has not been addressed by actors, creating leeway in further emergencies
The UN Declaration on the Rule of Law and the Application of the Rule of Law to the UN: A Reconstruction From an International Public Authority Perspective
The UN Declaration on the rule of law at the national and international levels seems to open new possibilities for listed terrorist suspects claiming legal protection or those seeking damages for harm caused by UN peacekeepers because the Declaration provides that the rule of law applies to the United Nations itself. However, the Declaration raises questions regarding the elements of the rule of law, its legal basis, and binding nature. This paper attempts a reconstruction of the UN Declaration and relevant UN practice under an international public authority perspective to explain and develop elements of the rule of law applicable to the UN, to determine its legal basis, and to investigate its binding nature. It argues, that since measures under Chapter VII must be effective if the UN wants to fulfil its purpose (Article 1 (1) UN Charter), the UN is bound by the rule of law insofar as “effective” measures require that related legitimacy concerns are addressed by rule of law safeguards
The EU Commission and the Fragmentation of International Law: Speaking European in a Foreign Land
The debate on the fragmentation of International Law has been relatively dormant in recent years. However, recent events demonstrate not only that this debate should be re-awoken, but also that some key elements of this debate must be reconsidered. Notably, while the fragmentation of International Law has often been discussed from the perspective of courts and judges, this article examines the view and the impact of a different institutional actor – the Commission of the European Union. This contribution analyzes a series of amicus briefs that were submitted in a number of investment treaties-based cases. These briefs, which were recently disclosed to the author, reflect a certain radicalization of the European Court of Justice’s view concerning the place and the role of the EU’s legal system within the international legal order. This article discusses the problematic implications that the Commission’s approach may have on the international legal order, as well as possible future pathways