Cryptology ePrint Archive
Not a member yet
24907 research outputs found
Sort by
Zeroizing Attacks against Evasive and Circular Evasive LWE
We develop new attacks against the Evasive LWE family of assumptions, in both the public and private-coin regime. To the best of our knowledge, ours are the first attacks against Evasive LWE in the public-coin regime, for any instantiation from the family. Our attacks are summarized below.
Public-Coin Attacks.
1. The recent work by Hseih, Lin and Luo [HLL23] constructed the first Attribute Based Encryption (ABE) for unbounded depth circuits by relying on the circular\u27\u27 evasive LWE assumption. This assumption has been popularly considered as a safe, public-coin instance of Evasive LWE in contrast to its private-coin\u27\u27 cousins (for instance, see
[CW25, DJM+25a]).
We provide the first attack against this assumption, challenging the widely held belief that this is a public-coin assumption.
2. We demonstrate a counter-example against vanilla public-coin evasive LWE by Wee [Wee22] in an unnatural parameter regime. Our attack crucially relies on the error in the pre-condition being larger than the error in the post-condition, necessitating a refinement of the assumption.
Private-Coin Attacks.
1. The recent work by Agrawal, Kumari and Yamada [AKY24a] constructed the first functional encryption scheme for pseudorandom functionalities (PRFE) and extended this to obfuscation for pseudorandom functionalities (PRIO) [AKY24c] by relying on private-coin evasive LWE. We provide a new attack against the assumption stated in the first posting of their work (subsequently refined to avoid these attacks).
2. The recent work by Branco et al. [BDJ+25] (concurrently to [AKY24c]) provides a construction of obfuscation for pseudorandom functionalities by relying on private-coin evasive LWE. We provide a new attack against their stated assumption.
3. Branco et al. [BDJ+25] showed that there exist contrived, self-referential\u27\u27 classes of pseudorandom functionalities for which pseudorandom obfuscation cannot exist. We extend their techniques to develop an analogous result for pseudorandom functional encryption.
While Evasive LWE was developed to specifically avoid zeroizing attacks\u27\u27, our work shows that in certain settings, such attacks can still apply
Enabling Microarchitectural Agility: Taking ML-KEM & ML-DSA from Cortex-M4 to M7 with SLOTHY
Highly-optimized assembly is commonly used to achieve the best performance for popular cryptographic schemes such as the newly standardized ML-KEM and ML-DSA.
The majority of implementations today rely on hand-optimized assembly for the core building blocks to achieve both security and performance.
However, recent work by Abdulrahman et al. takes a new approach, writing a readable base assembly implementation first and leaving the bulk of the optimization work to a tool named SLOTHY based on constraint programming.
SLOTHY performs instruction scheduling, register allocation, and software pipelining simultaneously using constraints modeling the architectural and microarchitectural details of the target platform.
In this work, we extend SLOTHY and investigate how it can be used to migrate already highly hand-optimized assembly to a different microarchitecture, while maximizing performance.
As a case study, we optimize state-of-the-art Arm Cortex-M4 implementations of ML-KEM and ML-DSA for the Arm Cortex-M7.
Our results suggest that this approach is promising:
For the number-theoretic transform (NTT) – the core building block of both ML-DSA and ML-KEM – we achieve speed-ups of and , respectively.
For Keccak – the permutation used by SHA-3 and SHAKE and also vastly used in ML-DSA and ML-KEM – we achieve speed-ups of 30% compared to the M4 code and 5% compared to hand-optimized M7 code.
For many other building blocks, we achieve similarly significant speed-ups of up to .
Overall, this results in 11 to 33% faster code for the entire cryptosystems
A Note on Zero-Knowledge Simulator of the CROSS Identification Protocol
We point out flaw in zero-knowledge of the CROSS identification protocol, , which allows a distinguisher to distinguish real and simulated transcripts given access to the witness. Moreover, we show that the real and simulated transcripts are not statistically indistinguishable, and therefore the protocol can only satisfy weak computational (rather than strong, statistical or perfect) Honest Verifier Zero-knowledge. This issue is still present in version 2.0 updated on January 31, 2025, which resolves the security losses attained via the attacks of [BLP+25
Stronger Security for Threshold Blind Signatures
Blind signatures allow a user to obtain a signature from an issuer in a privacy-preserving way: the issuer neither learns the signed message, nor can link the signature to its issuance. The threshold version of blind signatures further splits the secret key among n issuers, and requires the user to obtain at least t ≤ n of signature shares in order to derive the final signature. Security should then hold as long as at most t − 1 issuers are corrupt. Security for blind signatures is expressed through the notion of one-more unforgeability and demands that an adversary must not be able to produce more signatures than what is considered trivial after its interactions with the honest issuer(s). While one-more unforgeability is well understood for the single-issuer setting, the situation is much less clear in the threshold case: due to the blind issuance, counting which interactions can yield a trivial signature is a challenging task. Existing works bypass that challenge by using simplified models that do not fully capture the expectations of the threshold setting. In this work, we study the security of threshold blind signatures, and propose a framework of one-more unforgeability notions where the adversary can corrupt c < t issuers. Our model is generic enough to capture both interactive and non-interactive protocols, and it provides a set of natural properties with increasingly stronger guarantees, giving the issuers gradually more control over how their shares can be combined. As a point of comparison, we reconsider the existing threshold blind signature models and show that their security guarantees are weaker and less clearly comprehensible than they seem. We then re-assess the security of existing threshold blind signature schemes – BLS-based and Snowblind – in our framework, and show how to lift them to provide stronger security
Helix: Scalable Multi-Party Machine Learning Inference against Malicious Adversaries
With the growing emphasis on data privacy, secure multi-party computation has garnered significant attention for its strong security guarantees in developing privacy-preserving machine learning (PPML) schemes. However, only a few works address scenarios with a large number of participants. The state of the art by Liu et al. (LXY24, USENIX Security\u2724) first achieves a practical PPML protocol for up to 63 parties but is constrained to semi-honest security. Although naive extensions to the malicious setting are feasible, they would introduce significant overhead in verifying the correctness of multiplications. In this paper, we propose Helix, a scalable framework for maliciously secure PPML in the honest majority setting, aiming to enhance both the scalability and practicality of maliciously secure protocols. In particular, we first report a privacy leakage issue in LXY24 during prefix OR operations and introduce a round-optimized alternative based on a single-round vectorized four-input multiplication protocol. To mitigate the verification burden, we propose a set of lightweight compression protocols by exploiting reusability properties within the computation process, and seamlessly integrate them into existing verification techniques. Building on these enhancements, we further construct a practically-efficient and general -party computation protocol that serves as the cryptographic foundation for advanced PPML schemes. As a result, Helix achieves efficiency comparable to semi-honest frameworks. For instance, in 63-party neural network inference, Helix is only 1.9 (1.1) slower in the online phase and 1.2 (1.1) slower in preprocessing under LAN (WAN), compared to LXY24, in the best case
CCA-Secure Traceable Threshold (ID-based) Encryption and Application
A recent work by Boneh, Partap, and Rotem [Crypto\u2724] introduced the concept of traceable threshold encryption, in that if or more parties collude to construct a decryption box, which performs decryptions, then at least one party\u27s identity can be traced by making a few black-box queries to the box. This has important applications, e.g., in blockchain mempool privacy, where collusion yields high financial gain through MEVs without any consequence - the possibility of tracing discourages collusion.
Nevertheless, their definitions leave room for exploitation as they only achieve CPA security and do not consider inconsistency in decryption via different participating sets.
This paper proposes stronger definitions of traceable threshold encryption, which supports CCA-security and consistency. Our main approach considers identity-based variants of traceable encryption (which we also define). It converts that to a CCA-secure construction, adapting two generic transformations, first using a one-time signature and then a fingerprinting code.
We put forward two efficient instantiations of our identity-based scheme with different merits: our first construction is based on Boneh-Franklin IBE [Crypto\u2701] and has constant size ciphertexts but quadratic size public keys - this is proven secure based on XDH and BDDH. Our second construction is based on Boneh-Boyen IBE [Eurocrypt\u2704]. It supports both constant-size ciphertexts and constant-size public keys - this is proven secure based on a variant of the uber assumption over bilinear pairings. Our concrete analysis shows that the first construction\u27s ciphertext is much (~6x) smaller than the second construction. Finally, we extend the definitions to support consistency and achieve it by adjoining an efficient, non-interactive proof of correct encryption
Single Trace Side-Channel Vulnerabilities Discovery Using Statistical Leakage Simulator
This paper presents a novel single-trace side-channel attack on FALCON—a lattice-based post-quantum digital signature protocol recently approved for standardization by NIST. We target the discrete Gaussian sampling operation within the FALCON key generation scheme and use a single power measurement trace to succeed. Notably, negating the ‘shift right 63-bit’ operation (for 64-bit values) leaks critical information about the ‘-1’ vs. ‘0’ assignments to intermediate coefficients. These leaks enable full recovery of the generated secret keys. The proposed attack is simulated on the ELMO simulator running both reference and optimized software implementation from FALCON’s NIST Round 3 package. Statistical analysis with 20k tests reveals a full key-recovery success rate of 100% for FALCON-512. This work highlights the vulnerability of current software solutions to single-trace attacks and underscores the urgent need to develop single-trace resilient software for embedded systems in the presilicon phase
Quasi-Linear Indistinguishability Obfuscation via Mathematical Proofs of Equivalence and Applications
Indistinguishability obfuscation (\iO) is a powerful cryptographic primitive
and has been quoted as the ``swiss army-knife of modern cryptography\u27\u27. Most prior works on \iO focused on theoretical feasibility, and paid less attention to the efficiency of the constructions. As a result, all prior constructions stopped at achieving polynomial efficiency without worrying about how large the polynomial is.
In fact, it has even been conjectured that a polynomial dependence on the input length is necessary.
In this work, we show that if the two circuits to be obfuscated enjoy a succinct propositional logic proof of equivalence, then we can
create obfuscated versions of these programs that are computationally indistinguishable; and importantly, the obfuscated program\u27s efficiency is quasi-linear in the circuit size and proof size. We show that our quasi-linear \iO construction also leads to new applications. Specifically, we show how to achieve quasi-linear efficiency for 1) \iO for Turing Machines with unbounded inputs, and 2) multi-input functional encryption, also assuming succinct proofs of equivalence
Stationary Syndrome Decoding for Improved PCGs
Syndrome decoding (SD), and equivalently Learning Parity with Noise (LPN), is a fundamental problem in cryptography, which states that for a field , some compressing public matrix , and a secret sparse vector sampled from some noise distribution, is indistinguishable from uniform. Recently, the SD has gained significant interest due to its use in pseudorandom correlation generators (PCGs).
In pursuit of better efficiency, we propose a new assumption called Stationary Syndrome Decoding (SSD). In SSD, we consider correlated noise vectors and associated instances where the noise vectors are restricted to having non-zeros in the same small subset of positions . That is, for all , is uniformly random, while for all other , .
Although naively reusing the noise vector renders SD and LPN insecure via simple Gaussian elimination, we observe known attacks do not extend to our correlated noise. We show SSD is unconditionally secure against so-called linear attacks, e.g., advanced information set decoding and representation techniques (Esser and Santini, Crypto 2024). We further adapt the state-of-the-art nonlinear attack (Briaud and Oygarden, Eurocrypt 2023) to SSD and demonstrate both theoretically and experimentally resistance to the attack.
We apply SSD to PCGs to amortize the cost of noise generation protocol. For OT and VOLE generation, each instance requires communication instead of . For suggested parameters, we observe a improvement in the running time or between 6 and reduction in communication. For Beaver triple generation using Ring LPN, our techniques have the potential for substantial amortization due to the high concrete overhead of the Ring LPN noise generation
Transistor: a TFHE-friendly Stream Cipher
Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE) allows computations on encrypted data without requiring decryption, ensuring data privacy during processing. However, FHE introduces a significant expansion of ciphertext sizes compared to plaintexts, which results in higher communication. A practical solution to mitigate this issue is transciphering, where only the master key is homomorphically encrypted, while the actual data is encrypted using a symmetric cipher, usually a stream cipher. The server then homomorphically evaluates the stream cipher to convert the encrypted data into a homomorphically encrypted form.
We introduce Transistor, a stream cipher specifically designed for efficient homomorphic evaluation within the TFHE scheme, a widely-used FHE framework known for its fast bootstrapping and ability to handle low-precision data. Transistor operates on which is chosen to optimize TFHE performances. Its components are carefully engineered to both control noise growth and provide strong security guarantees. First, a simple TFHE-friendly implementation technique for LFSRs allows us to use such components to cheaply increase the state size. At the same time, a small Finite State Machine is the only part of the state updated non-linearly, each non-linear operation corresponding in TFHE to a rather expensive Programmable Bootstrapping. This update is done using an AES-round-like transformation. But, in contrast to other stream ciphers like SNOW or LEX, our construction comes with information-theoretic security arguments proving that an attacker cannot obtain any information about the secret key from three or fewer consecutive keystream outputs. These information-theoretic arguments are then combined with a thorough analysis of potential correlations to bound the minimal keystream length required for recovering the secret key.
Our implementation of Transistor significantly outperforms the state of the art of TFHE transciphering, achieving a throughput of over 60 bits/s on a standard CPU, all while avoiding the need for an expensive initialization process