Journal.fi
Not a member yet
93357 research outputs found
Sort by
Mia Korpiola (2009). Between Betrothal and Bedding: Marriage Formation in Sweden 1200–1610. The Northen World. North Europe and the Baltic c. 400–1700 A.D. Peoples, Economies and Cultures. Vol. 43.
No full textValtter Luoto (2010). Aamos – Oikeudenmukaisuuden julistaja: Aamoksen kirjan kommentaari.
No full text
Suomalaiset Stalinin vainoissa: Kriittinen katsaus kuoleman kirjanpitoon
Get PDFJosif Stalinin 1930-luvun puolivälin Neuvostoliitossa eli karkeasti ottaen 30 000 suomalaista. Keitä he olivat? Ja mitä heille tapahtui Stalinin suuren terrorin vuosina 1937–1938? Aiheesta on kirjoi-tettu runsaasti, mutta arviot suomalaisuhrien määrästä vaihtele-vat muutamasta tuhannesta miltei 40 000:een. Miksi luvut eroa-vat niin hämmentävän paljon? Mitä uusin tutkimustieto kertoo suomalaisten tuomittujen määristä? Artikkeli nojaa vahvasti ”Suomalaiset Venäjällä 1917–1964” -tutkimushankkeen tietoihin. Kansallisarkistolla toimivassa hankkeessa on käyty use-aan kertaan läpi kaikki ne Suomen kansalaiset ja entiset kansalai-set, joiden tiedetään saaneen tuomion suuren terrorin vuosina
Punasuomalaiset Uhtuan johtajina 1922–1935
Get PDFArtikkelissa tarkastellaan suomalaisten punapakolaisten osuutta neuvostohallinnon ja sosialismin rakentamisessa Vienan Karjalaan, keskittyen erityisesti Uhtualle lähetettyihin punasuomalaisiin
Järkevän sijoittajan monet kasvot
No full textThe many faces of a reasonable investorA reasonable investor is an international and central concept in the securities market regulation. It is considered as a standard for assessing, for example, the need to disclose insider information and provide information. It serves as a criterion for what information is essential. What is problematic is that a reasonable investor has not been defined exhaustively and unambiguously, even though it is a concept that cuts across the entire securities market. Generally, a reasonable investor is seen as an average investor. Research from various academic fields, however, shows that there are in fact different types of investor who have a wide range of investment strategies – each of which is reasonable in its own sense. The characteristics of a reasonable investor should be identified because the reasonable investor standard affects the disclosure obligations, according to which corporate information must be disclosed to the market. Differences between investors have been taken somewhat into account in the regulation of securities markets and in legal literature, but this process has not been systematic. In this article, the existence of different reasonable investor types is presented; in addition, an explanation is provided as to why the defining of these types should be based on the investment goals
Tunnustukseen perustuva esitutkinnan rajoittaminen ja syyttämättä jättäminen toimenpiteistäluopumisjärjestelmän uudenkaltaisten tavoitteiden ilmentäjänä
No full textLakimies-aikakauskirjan nuorten kirjoittajien palkinto v. 2021
Confession-based waiver of penal measures as an expression of the novel objectives of the waiver systemThe significance of waiver of measures in the Finnish criminal justice system has grown considerably in recent decades. The latest addition to the waiver system, the confession provision, entered into force in 2015 and has met controversial reactions. As the individual grounds for a waiver interact closely with the fundamental principles underlying the waiver system as a whole, the conflicting reactions to the confession provision express a shift in the objectives of criminal policy on a general level. The author asks what kind of shift the confession provision represents in terms of the purpose and contents of the waiver system, and whether that shift is justifiable from the point of view of criminal policy.
The procedural-economic reasoning behind the waiver system has become a more important part of the discretion of the authorities as a result of the enactment of the confession provision. In addition, the way in which savings are sought has changed so that, unlike the previous waiver criteria, the confession provision seeks to allow for the allocation of resources on the investigation of more serious crimes. Such a reallocation of the resources of the criminal justice system is according to the author to be welcomed in principle, as the legitimacy of the criminal justice system is not unsustainably weakened compared to a situation where the investigation of certain minor offences would be inadequate due to lack of resources. However, this requires that the confession provision be applied in accordance with strictly defined application criteria that fulfil the requirements of basic human rights.
