38978 research outputs found
Sort by
Predictive Models for Estimating the Duration of Labour Induction: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal
No full textThis project archives the original protocol and documented amendments for a systematic review entitled “Predictive Models for Estimating the Duration of Labour Induction.”
The protocol was initially submitted to PROSPERO but was marked as out of scope and therefore not publicly registered. To ensure transparency and auditability, the original time-stamped protocol submission and a structured log of methodological amendments are made publicly available here.
The systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA principles and critically appraised prediction models using the PROBAST framework. This repository provides documentation of all a priori methodological decisions and subsequent clarifications
Acute Cytokine Responses to High-Intensity Intermittent Exercise in Humans: A Systematic Review
No full textThis systematic review aims to (i) synthesize acute changes in circulating cytokines and related inflammatory mediators following a single session of high-intensity intermittent exercise in humans and (ii) examine how participant characteristics and exercise protocol variables moderate these responses
Frames for Interpreting and Influencing Public Employee Voice
No full textThis study involves an online vignette experiment with public-sector professionals recruited through Prolific. Participants read a workplace scenario describing a city emergency relief fund that appears to be distributed inequitably, favoring politically connected neighborhoods. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three brief “expectations for employees” frames—Bureaucracy, Democracy, or Pragmatism—which signal different normative understandings of whether and how public employees should speak up. Following exposure to the assigned frame, participants completed a sequential decision task indicating whether they would remain silent or escalate concerns through internal and potentially external channels. The study examines whether exposure to these competing interpretive frames systematically influences the likelihood, form, and escalation trajectory of public employee voice
