38978 research outputs found
Sort by
Published Version (Zenodo)
No full text**THIS HYPOTHESIS IS NOW PERMANENTLY ARCHIVED**
The final, citable version of this hypothesis and its 25-element testing protocol has been published on Zenodo:
**DOI:** 10.5281/zenodo.18472417
**Link:** https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18472417
**Files available at Zenodo:**
1. Richat-Nile Hypothesis PDF
2. 25-element forensic testing protocol (Excel)
3. Methodology addendum (AI-assisted design)
**This OSF project will now be used for:**
- Test results and data collection
- Collaborative analysis
- Version tracking of ongoing researc
New Ship for Galileo - Una nuova nave per Galileo
No full textThis OSF project hosts open-access materials related to the work
“A New Ship for Galileo”.
The authoritative Version of Record of the work is archived on Zenodo.
This project provides an additional open dissemination channel and does
not constitute an independent version of the work
Ethics Approval
No full textHoughton IRB board approval will be obtained before the beginning of the experiment
05.1 - Epistemic Hygiene & Methodological Standards
No full textEpistemic Hygiene & Methodological Standards (v0.1) defines the normative analysis discipline for Stability Biology.
It provides a practical checklist for designing, analyzing, and reporting BSMI studies in a way that preserves commensurability, guards against overfitting, axis fishing, and narrative drift, and makes clear distinctions between exploratory and confirmatory work.
This section sets mandatory expectations for QC transparency, contextual declaration, checkpoint awareness, and responsible use of stability axes and Ψ. It defines how results may be interpreted and claimed, not what data must exist or how it is encoded.
05.1 operates in coordination with MISTAB (05.2) and the Core Data Schema (05.3) and is normative for all public-facing materials claiming BSMI conformance
05.4 "Anti-Enshittification" Charter
No full textThe "Anti-Enshittification" Charter is a short normative statement of commons-protective norms for Stability Biology. It commits the project to open standards, transparency of Ψ and stability metrics, resistance to metric capture and enclosure, and a non-extractive orientation for commercial use. It should be read alongside Governance, Licensing & Stewardship (05.5)
Impact of frailty on effects of antihypertensive treatment in cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality SAP
No full textThe aim of this individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis is to investigate whether patient frailty modifies the effect of antihypertensive treatment, using data from five landmark randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled antihypertensive trials. This statistical analysis plan (SAP) pre-specifies the primary and secondary outcomes of the study, the analytical approach for evaluating the interaction between frailty level and antihypertensive treatment, and the key variables included in this IPD meta-analysis. The primary analysis uses trial-stratified Fine–Gray competing-risk regression models. The SAP also outlines planned sensitivity analyses, including subgroup analyses and re-analyses using a frailty index constructed after excluding cardiovascular-related items
Desarrollo de un Sistema de Diagnóstico Actitudinal hacia la Estadística en Estudiantes de Ingeniería mediante el SATS-28
No full textEste estudio desarrolla un índice de diagnóstico actitudinal hacia la
estadística para estudiantes de ingeniería mediante la aplicación del
instrumento SATS-28. Se analizaron dos cohortes de la Universidad Adolfo
Ibáñez (Chile): 377 estudiantes en 2015 y 451 en 2020. Los resultados
revelan una evolución positiva en todas las dimensiones (Afecto,
Competencia Cognitiva, Valor y Dificultad), con excelente confiabilidad
(α = 0.87-0.89). El índice propuesto facilita intervenciones pedagógicas
diferenciadas basadas en perfiles actitudinales específicos.
Palabras clave: SATS-28, actitudes hacia la estadística, educación en
ingeniería, confiabilidad, decisiones pedagógica
What is the evidence available on the use of surgical simulation in medical education, compared with traditional teaching methods, in health professionals in training: a scoping review.
No full textINTRODUCTION
Surgical simulation has become established as a relevant educational strategy within medical training, enabling the progressive development of technical and non-technical skills in controlled and safe environments. Through the use of low- and high-fidelity simulators, physical models, and virtual platforms, this methodology facilitates experiential learning, deliberate repetition, and structured feedback—elements considered essential for acquiring surgical competencies. Its incorporation into undergraduate and postgraduate programs has been driven by the need to improve patient safety, standardize teaching, and respond to the growing demands for quality in healthcare (1,2,3)
Data to the AE project
No full textEmotional ambivalence toward others’ outcomes may involve two competing appraisal systems: an empathy-based appraisal concerned with another’s welfare and a justice-based appraisal concerned with whether outcomes are morally deserved. This research tested whether these appraisals can be co-activated within a single evaluation and how arousal shapes such emotional ambivalence. Across two studies, participants evaluated prosocial or selfish individuals experiencing positive or negative outcomes. In Study 1, self-reports indicated positive reactions to prosocial success and negative reactions to selfish success, with the reverse for misfortunes. fEMG showed simultaneous activation of the zygomaticus major and corrugator supercilii, providing physiological evidence of co-activation in mixed responses. Study 2 found greater ambivalence under low arousal than high arousal. The results indicate that emotional ambivalence arises when empathy-based and justice-based appraisals are jointly engaged and that arousal limits the conditions under which this co-activation becomes observable
Organisational Factors Shaping Volunteer Workforce Sustainability: A Scoping Review Protocol
No full textProtocol update: Version 2 uploaded on 11 March 2026. Minor refinements were made to the search strategy, including limiting the date range to 2010–12 February 2026 and refining the ProQuest database selection to exclude dissertations and theses. No changes were made to the review objectives, research questions, or eligibility criteria