Proceedings in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Not a member yet
462 research outputs found
Sort by
Effect of Caprini Risk Assessment Model integration into electronic medical record on surgical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis
Full text linkVariations in cesarean deliveries associated with payer type
Full text linkObjective: The rates of cesarean deliveries (CD) in the United States (U.S.) have been increasing since the 1990s making it the most common operating room procedure in U.S. hospitals. CD may be necessary due to a variety of medical indications; however, it is not clear whether socioeconomic factors affect CD rates. This study examines the association between type of insurance coverage pregnant women have and rates of CD in the U.S.Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of the discharge records of pregnant women admitted to U.S. hospitals between 2012 and 2014 extracted from the National Inpatient Sample dataset. The study population was divided into two groups according to insurance coverage (public vs private). Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association between type of insurance and CD rates while controlling for an array of demographic, medical, social and behavioral confounding factors.Results: 12,450,349 subjects were included in the analysis, of those, 29.9% had a CD. 82.6% of women are between 18-34 years old and 49.5% are Caucasians. 48.9% of women have private insurance. Women with private insurance received a higher percentage of cesarean deliveries (31.8%) compared to women with public insurance (28.3%), adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.30 (CI: 1.29-1.30, p<0.001). This ratio was more significant in AMA women (aOR: 1.37) but not among teenagers. Although, higher in all race/ethnicity groups, African American, Hispanic and Native American women have more significant association to receive CD when covered by private insurance compared to Caucasian women. Giving birth at an urban-teaching hospital was associated with a higher CD rate (31.9% vs. 27.4%), aOR: 1.42. Delivery in the Northeast was associated with increased CD rates (32.8% vs. 27.5%) when covered with private insurance, aOR: 1.43, while in the West, private insurance was associated with less CD, aOR: 1.17.Conclusion: After controlling for demographic, clinical, behavioral, and system variables, private insurance was associated with a 30% increase in rate of CD compared to public insurance
Association between duration of controlled ovarian stimulation and live birth rate in women undergoing In Vitro Fertilization: a SART CORS analysis
Full text linkBackground: In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF) treatment involves synchronization of multiple time-sensitive events, most of which are rate-limiting too. Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) is one such event. The reproductive outcomes based on the duration of COS (d-COS) in a fresh, IVF embryo transfer (ET) are not well established and therefore, remains largely uncertain. Objective: To evaluate the association between d-COS and live birth rate (LBR) in women undergoing a fresh IVF-ET using autologous oocytes. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a US nationwide IVF register – SARTCORS (Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System). From a total of 93,889 cycles, we included 56,666 fresh, autologous, IVF - ET treatment cycles from January 2014 through December 2015, with follow-up until October 2016. Adjusted odds and risk ratio with 95% confidence intervals were estimated while controlling for multiple demographic factors and other potential confounders. Variables and outcomes: The primary exposure variable was d-COS defined as the difference in days between gonadotrophin administration and oocyte retrieval. The primary outcome measure was live birth following a fresh IVF-ET. Secondary outcome measures included biochemical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate. Results: A total of 56,666 treatment cycles (mean [SD] age of 33.9 [4.47], BMI of 26.1 [6.02], AMH value of 2.19 [3.37]), and a baseline FSH value of 7.62 [3.49]) underwent a fresh IVF-ET. The LBR after a combined analysis for all ages and all protocols was 44.2 % (n = 25043). In the combined analysis, there was a statistically significant decrease in the live birth rate with LBR with d-COS beyond 10 days. The adjusted OR (95% CI) of LBR for a woman who had 11, 12, 13 and ≥14 days of COS, compared to optimal duration of 10 days was 0.97 (0.87-0.99), 0.94 (0.8-1), 0.83 (0.77-0.89) and 0.73 (0.68-0.79) respectively. The AOR (95% CI) of miscarriage rates for a woman who had 11, 12, 13 and ≥14 days of COS, compared to referent was 1.12 (1-1.26), 0.99 (0.87-1.12), 1.03 (0.90 -1.17) and 1.04 (0.90 - 1.2) respectively. With increasing d-COS, the implantation rate (IR) and clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) also showed a decreasing trend, as with other reproductive outcomes. The RR (95% CI) for implantation rate in a woman who had 11, 12, 13 and ≥14 days of COS, compared to referent was 0.97 (0.93-1), 0.97 (0.93-1.01), 0.91 (0.87-0.95) and 0.86 (0.82-0.9). The adjusted OR (95% CI) of CPR for a woman who had 11, 12, 13 and ≥14 days of COS, compared to referent was 0.95 (0.89-1.01), 0.93 (0.87-0.99), 0.8 (0.75-0.86) and 0.7 (0.65-0.75) respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: In this nationwide cohort study of women undergoing fresh IVF-ET using autologous oocytes, controlled ovarian stimulation lasting approximately 10-days was associated with an optimal live birth rate
Full thickness epidermal burn from a heating pad on a cesarean incision with silver dressing: a case report
Full text linkWe present a case of a full thickness epidermal burn resulting from an all-natural clay-based heating pad over a cesarean incision silver dressing to bring awareness to the risks associated with nonpharmacologic management of post cesarean pain. There is limited guidance on nonpharmacological management of post cesarean pain. It is important that providers are able to advise their patients about their options, including to be wary of using heating pads on post-cesarean dressings, especially with pain in the early post-partum period
COVID-19 related complete blood count changes among asymptomatic pregnant women
Full text linkObjective: To evaluate complete blood count (CBC) changes that suggest coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) among asymptomatic pregnant women attending routine antenatal careMethods: A cross-sectional study included 187 healthy pregnant women who were attending the antenatal care clinic of a tertiary University hospital between March and June 2020. After a thorough history and examinations, a venous blood sample was taken from each participant for complete and differential blood counts. Those who showed CBC findings suggestive of COVID-19 were further scheduled for a nasopharyngeal swab for detection of SARS-CoV-2 specific antigens through polymerase chain reaction (PCR).Results: We found 5.3% (n=10) of the study population showed CBC changes that are suggestive of COVID-19. When they were scheduled for nasopharyngeal swab for a PCR confirmatory test, 30% (n=3) of them were PCR positive (which represented 1.6% of the entire study population). The most frequently encountered COVID-19-suggestive change in peripheral blood leukocyte differential counts was leucopenia (100%), followed by decreased eosinophil count (50%), then neutropenia and lymphocytopenia (30%).Conclusions: Certain differential leucocyte count changes (leucopenia, neutropenia, lymphocytopenia and decreased eosinophil count) among asymptomatic pregnant women might be related to COVID-19 infection and may indicate a need for further testing
Upstream oncology: identifying social determinants of health in a gynecologic oncology population
Full text linkIntroduction: Social determinants of health (SDoH) are the factors that affect a patient’s health quality and outcomes and contribute to health disparities. Evidence suggests that clinical care contributes only 20% to patients’ health outcomes, while the remainder is under the influence of upstream factors. The upstream approach to healthcare aims to address SDoH before they contribute to less ideal outcomes downstream. Several SDoH may contribute to outcomes for cancer patients. This Upstream Gynecologic Oncology Initiative seeks to identify which SDoH affect a population of patients with gynecologic malignancies.Hypothesis: This study hypothesizes that women receiving care for gynecologic malignancies are affected by specific SDoH among the categories of housing, food, transportation, finances, health literacy and social support. This study aims to identify the frequency of these six social factors among the outpatient gynecologic oncology population at the University of Iowa.Methods: This needs assessment is the first phase in a quality improvement project assessing the SDoH affecting women with gynecologic cancers. Two hundred twenty-two patients receiving outpatient care for gynecologic malignancies completed an anonymous needs assessment survey. Validated survey questions regarding housing, food, transportation, finances, health literacy and social support were used to identify needs. Responses were considered positive if any degree of need was reported.Results: Responses demonstrated the most substantial need in the categories of social support (32%), health literacy (28%) and financial stability (24%). Less need was reported in the categories of food (11%), transportation (5%) and housing (4%). Fifty-seven percent of women reported at least one social need among the six categories screened.Conclusion: Upstream SDoH, most notably social support, health literacy and financial stability are identified to be present and likely contributing to health quality, outcomes, and disparities within this gynecologic oncology patient population. Overall, these findings support the idea that SDoH should be assessed for each unique patient population - and for each patient receiving care for gynecologic cancer. While social support was the most frequently reported SDoH, many patients already received adequate help at home; suggesting that meaningful efforts should next be directed at improving health literacy in the population. Appreciation and assessment of SDoH potential to impact care and management should be used to design a routine screening tool for the study population and organize resources to address or mitigate the identified needs
Effect of esomeprazole on maternal serum soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 and endoglin in patients with early-onset preeclampsia
Full text linkObjective: This study evaluates the effect of esomeprazole on the maternal serum levels of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) and soluble endoglin (sEng) in patients with early-onset preeclampsia.Methods: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was carried out in a tertiary University hospital between March 2018, and September 2019 (Clinical Trials.Gov: NCT03213639). The study included women between 28 and 31+6 weeks gestational age who had been diagnosed as preeclampsia without severe features. They were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio into an esomeprazole group, which received esomeprazole 40 mg orally once a day, and a placebo group, which received one placebo tablet daily. Blood samples were obtained to assess levels of serum sFlt-1and sEng using ELISA testing. The primary outcome was the difference between the mean serum level of sFlt-1 and sEng at the start of treatment and at the termination of pregnancy in both groups.Results: Eighty-eight patients were randomly assigned into both groups (44 in each). No statistically significant difference was found in the levels of sFlt-1 between both groups at admission and termination of pregnancy. The number of days of treatment for the esomeprazole group was slightly longer than the placebo group (11.4±9.4 vs. 10.3±6.3 days, P=0.515). No statistically significant difference in the rate of maternal and fetal complications occurred between the two groups. No side effects from the study medications were reported.Conclusions: Esomeprazole, at the dosage used in this study did not effectively lower the serum levels of sFlt-1 and sEng in patients with early-onset preeclampsia. Furthermore, it did not prolong the duration of pregnancy, nor did it decrease maternal or fetal complications
Effect of dexamethasone on reducing pain and gastrointestinal symptoms associated with cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Full text linkBackground: Dexamethasone has analgesic and antiemetic actions that have been documented in the literature. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate its overall effectiveness in reducing a variety of negative outcomes after cesarean section.Objectives: To investigate the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone for reducing pain associated with cesarean section, nausea, vomiting, pruritus, postoperative need for analgesia, postoperative antiemetic requests and headache.Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science for relevant clinical trials. We then performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, including only randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Our main population target was women undergoing elective cesarean delivery. The intervention under consideration was dexamethasone administered both by intravenous (IV) or subcutaneous (SC) over a variety of doses. The comparator was a placebo. Our main outcomes included: (1) perceptions as indicated by pain scores, (2) occurrence of nausea and (3) occurrence of vomiting. Secondary outcomes included: (4) occurrence of pruritus, (5) need for postoperative analgesia, (6) need for postoperative antiemetic drugs and (7) occurrence of headache. We assessed the quality of included studies using the risk of bias tool described in Cochrane's handbook for systematic reviews of interventions.Results: We found that dexamethasone seemed to significantly reduce scores for pain at rest (p<0.001), as well as occurrence of nausea (p<0.001) and vomiting (p<0.001). The drug also showed significant reduction of negative symptoms in other secondary outcomes, including need for postoperative analgesia (p<0.001) and postoperative antiemetic drugs (p<0.001). However, the drug showed no significant effect in reducing headache and pruritus or in improving pain at movement scores. Conclusion: Dexamethasone appears to decrease perception of pain at rest and protects against nausea and vomiting. However, it does not seem effective against headaches or pruritus