UIC Law Open Access Repository
Not a member yet
4764 research outputs found
Sort by
Is the President Immune from a Grand Jury Subpoena Issued by a Local Prosecutor for Materials That Have Nothing to Do with the President\u27s Official Responsibilities?
Does the First Amendment Permit a State to Specify and Define the Composition of State Courts by Reference to the Political Party of the Judges?
May a Federal District Court Abstain from Hearing a Case Brought by Hungarian Holocaust Survivors against Hungary on the Ground That the Plaintiffs Should Sue in Hungary Instead?
Does a Federal Tort Claims Act Judgment Bar Foreclose a Plaintiff\u27s Claims against Individual Officers for Constitutional Violations When the Court Dismissed the Plaintiff\u27s FTCA Claims against the Government for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction in the Same Lawsuit?
Does the Freedom of Information Act Compel Disclosure of Agency Records That Were Generated in a Formal Interagency Consultation Process over the Effects of an Agency Action, Later Modified through That Process, on Endangered Species?
Why Did Illinois Call a Constitutional Convention in 1968?, 72 Rutgers U.L. Rev. 1021 (2020)
Gut Renovations: Using Critical and Comparative Rhetoric to Remodel How the Law Addresses Privilege and Power, 23 Harv. Latinx L. Rev. 1 (2020)
Can the Heirs of German Jews Sue a German Foundation in U.S. Courts for Art and Artifacts That Their Predecessors Sold to Prussia, under Duress, as Part of the Holocaust?
NCAA Down for The Count? New State Legislation Threatens Collegiate Sports as We Know It, 19 UIC REV. INTELL. PROP. L. 346 (2020)
Since the 1950s, the NCAA’s amateurism shield has served as a stalwart protector in combatting litigation from athletes and coaches within its purview. They have faced many lawsuits since that time, with the overwhelming majority failing. As this comment shows, complaints have been of a wide variety such as antitrust, employment, and state action litigation. The amateurism principle was their defense in each of those situations. But now, many states have recently begun passing legislation that would allow student athletes to obtain compensation, in more ways than one. These statutes are a shot through the heart of the amateurism principle, leaving the NCAA’s authority hanging on by a thread. This comment will analyze the fall out from the proposed statutes and the consequences that will result. It will look at possible options in resolving this dispute and ultimately will come to a conclusion on the best possible resolution for both parties