UIC Law Open Access Repository
Not a member yet
4764 research outputs found
Sort by
Can the Federal Courts Review an Agency Decision Not to Cancel the Removal of a Non-Citizen Permanent Resident of the United States on the Ground That Removal Would Not Result in Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship to the Person\u27s Lawfully Present Family Member?
No full textDoes an Employer Violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by Disciplining an Evangelical Christian Employee for Failing to Work on Assigned Sunday Shifts When the Employee\u27s Failure Created at Least a De Minimus Burden on the Employee\u27s Coworkers?
No full textDoes Federal Tax Law Require the IRS to Notify Persons and Entities Identified in an IRS Summons ‘in Aid of the Collection’ of a Tax Debt, Even When the Delinquent Taxpayer Does Not Have a Direct Property Interest in the Subject of the Summons? And Can Those Persons and Entities Petition the Courts to Quash Such a Summons?
No full textIs a Defendant\u27s Contemporaneous, Subjective Understanding or Belief about the Lawfulness of Its Conduct Relevant in Determining Whether It “Knowingly” Defrauded the Government in Violation of the False Claims Act?
No full text
Brief of Amicus Curiae the National Law School Veterans Clinic Consortium in Support of the Petitioner, Skaar v. McDonough Docket No. 22-815 (2023)
Get PDFThe Clinic filed an amicus brief on behalf of NLSVCC in the United States Supreme Court in support of the plaintiff’s petition for writ of certiorari. NLSVCC argued that class-wide injunctive relief would resolve widespread, systemic problems within the Department of Veterans Affairs
Critical and Comparative Rhetoric: Unmasking Privilege and Power in Law and Legal Advocacy to Achieve Truth, Justice, and Equity
No full textThe book explores how alternative communication approaches can reshape legal meanings and outcomes to promote inclusivity, equity, and justice, using comparative and critical rhetoric. By challenging traditional norms rooted in White and Euro-centric perspectives, it introduces new rhetorical models derived from diasporic and non-Western cultures. It encourages readers to rethink their understanding of logic and rhetoric, advocating for innovative knowledge-building methods that can address and heal the law\u27s existing structures, which often sustain privilege and power dynamics.https://repository.law.uic.edu/facbooks/1026/thumbnail.jp